John Bolton Another Constitution Ignoramus

Right said:
Seems fine to me.
Click to expand...

That's because you're a war hawk!

I think Iraq wasn't just a mistake, I know it was an unnecessary, undeclared, willful unconstitutional act. I oppose nation building! I oppose military and political meddling in other people's wars. I oppose the spending of a trillion $ to destabilize an entire region of the globe. John Bolton has no problem with all of the above and apparently neither do you?
 
Robo said:
Just exactly what is it that has you confused about the last paragraph MoFo?

Can't you comprehend the fact that the federal government found it necessary to amend the Constitution to institute the prohibition of alcohol and never sought to amend the Constitution to institute today's Drug War MoFo? Have you any rational explanation for that MoFo?
Click to expand...

You contradicted yourself. Either the Feds have the power or they don't. Make up your mind.
 
Robo said:
That's because you're a war hawk!

I think Iraq wasn't just a mistake, I know it was an unnecessary, undeclared, willful unconstitutional act. I oppose nation building! I oppose military and political meddling in other people's wars. I oppose the spending of a trillion $ to destabilize an entire region of the globe. John Bolton has no problem with all of the above and apparently neither do you?
Click to expand...

You're making this up.
 
Robo said:
That's because you're a war hawk!

I think Iraq wasn't just a mistake, I know it was an unnecessary, undeclared, willful unconstitutional act. I oppose nation building! I oppose military and political meddling in other people's wars. I oppose the spending of a trillion $ to destabilize an entire region of the globe. John Bolton has no problem with all of the above and apparently neither do you?
Click to expand...

You're a fucking idiot.
 
Guille said:
You contradicted yourself. Either the Feds have the power or they don't. Make up your mind.
Click to expand...

My last paragraph.

"More proof that Bolton is “full of it,” is the fact that historically the feds found it a necessity to pass an amendment to the Constitution to prohibit the transportation and sale of alcohol. No such amendment has ever even been sought, let alone passed to allow the feds to constitutionally prohibit any substance, marijuana included."

Where's the contradiction MoFo?

The feds have no constitutional authority to prohibit any drugs without a constitutional amendment as proven by the evidence provided in my last paragraph moron!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top