Janet Yellen and Unwinding QE

cawacko

Well-known member
I share the same sentiments as this author regarding the Fed induced asset bubbles and the huge challenge we face having to unwind everything here. If just printing money and keeping rates at zero had no negative repercussions we would never stop doing it.




Opinion: Stocks could crash if the Fed’s Yellen can’t perform a miracle

Can she and central bank policy makers really drain trillions of dollars in liquidity without harming the economy?


Investors have bought into what some bankers have been calling the “immaculate conception” thought up by a group of humans led by Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen.

Does anyone see the danger to their money in believing that Fed policy makers can pull off such a miracle? The miracle, of course, is draining trillions of dollars in liquidity from the financial system without causing harm to the economy or securities.

A chart

Please click here to see a chart of the Fed’s total assets. Notice how they ballooned from under $1 trillion to $4.5 trillion. The continued excitement in the stock market today shows that investors believe the Fed will execute its plan to unwind its massive balance sheet in a manner that will enable the stock market to continue its march upwards.

The Fed’s balance sheet primarily consists of bonds that it bought in a program known as quantitative easing. The Fed’s purchase of bonds drove interest rates to artificially low levels — record lows, in fact. Low rates, in turn, have artificially inflated prices of bonds, stocks and real estate.

The Fed can unwind its balance sheet by selling the bonds or simply letting the bonds run off. The Fed prefers the latter. “Run off” simply means that when the bonds mature, the proceeds are not reinvested. If the Fed were to sell the bonds, the supply could depress bond prices and raise interest rates. Quickly rising interest rates could cause a recession in the economy and a crash in the stock market.


Translating mumbo jumbo into English

Let’s set aside the economic mumbo jumbo and think clearly in plain English. The Fed created trillions of dollars out of thin air that inflated stock prices. Now the Fed is going to get rid of trillions of dollars that it created yet investors think stock prices will continue to rise.

Investors have simply forgotten that there is no free lunch. A free lunch is exactly what investors are expecting.

What could go wrong?

The Fed has tight control of short-term interest rates, but long-term rates are a different story. As the unwinding proceeds, the plausibility of the Fed losing control of long-term interest rates should be of concern to investors.

The stock market has jumped by about 250%, in large part because of the liquidity created by the Fed. Stocks compete with bonds. Due to artificially low interest rates on bonds, a big part of the move in stocks is not due to higher earnings but to price-to-earnings (P/E) expansion. It is conceivable that in the future we may see P/E contraction if long-term interest rates rise.

Why must the Fed unwind?

If the Fed does not unwind its large balance sheet, it risks much higher inflation and, more importantly, stocks and real estate that would enter a giant bubble. Ultimately, all bubbles burst, causing a lot of pain.

What to do now


There is no immediate danger, and there is still money to be made in the stock market. But it is important for investors to be on extra alert as the Fed attempts to achieve this immaculate conception.

Investors may consider slowly building some hedges. The simplest hedge is to not be fully invested and hold a fair amount of cash. For those who do not mind some sophistication, hedges can come in the form of inverse ETFs against broad-based ETFs such as S&P 500 ETF SPY+0.17% Nasdaq 100 ETF QQQ+0.22% and small-cap ETF IWM+0.08%

Investors can also selectively consider near-zero cost option collars. Gold, silver and miner ETFs such as gold ETF GLD-0.18% silver ETF SLV-1.2% and miner ETF GDX-1.1% may also act as hedges, but the timing of their purchases needs to be carefully orchestrated. Another source of possible hedges are inverse bond ETFs such as TBF+0.62% and TBT+1.29% or option hedges against a popular Treasury ETF TLT-0.63%

Reproduced below is the “what to do now” section from the Morning Capsule that is provided daily to subscribers to The Arora Report:

“It is important for investors to look ahead and not in the rearview mirror.

“Consider continuing to hold existing positions. Based on individual risk preference, consider holding cash or Treasury bills 18%-28%, short- to medium-term hedges of 15%-25%, and very short-term hedges of 15%.

“It is worth remembering that you cannot take advantage of new upcoming opportunities if you are not holding enough cash. When adjusting hedge levels, consider adjusting partial stop quantities for stock positions (non-ETF); consider using wider stops on remaining quantities and also allowing more room for high-beta stocks. High-beta stocks are ones that move more than the market.”



http://www.marketwatch.com/amp/story/guid/BA657F58-673F-11E7-819C-E53F1BEA2AD2
 
They weren't printing money, I don't know why conservatives keep employing that term, what they did was put more money into circulation by lowering reserve requirements, lower the interest rate, buying bonds, etc., it't not printing money

Since the economy has improved, and there is more money in circulation, they will reverse the trend employing the same tools they used to add money except of course selling bonds rather than buying bonds

Is it a certain process, of course not, but it is traditional monetary policy
 
They weren't printing money, I don't know why conservatives keep employing that term, what they did was put more money into circulation by lowering reserve requirements, lower the interest rate, buying bonds, etc., it't not printing money

Since the economy has improved, and there is more money in circulation, they will reverse the trend employing the same tools they used to add money except of course selling bonds rather than buying bonds

Is it a certain process, of course not, but it is traditional monetary policy

It's semantics but it's still printing money.

You clearly think this is just a smooth process with zero repercussions and our current Fed induced bubbles will have no bursting
 
Explain how reducing reserve requirements is printing money, how lowering interest rates is printing money, bonds you could frame a response but it still isn't actually printing money

Printing money is a talk radio cliche, it's traditional monetary policy practiced for decades regardless of what party is in control
 
Explain how reducing reserve requirements is printing money, how lowering interest rates is printing money, bonds you could frame a response but it still isn't actually printing money

Printing money is a talk radio cliche, it's traditional monetary policy practiced for decades regardless of what party is in control

QE is not traditional monetary policy by any means and doesn't have anything to do with Democrats or Republicans. It creates new money to buy bonds or other financial assets. You can argue the semantics but for the sake of discussion it is printing money and it has nothing to do with talk radio.

And by bloating their balance sheet to keep rates low they have created asset bubbles and you will be in for a big surprise if you think the unwinding of these purchases will be smooth sailing.
 
Back
Top