Jackson, Biden's Supreme Court pick, refuses to define the word 'woman'

D

dukkha

Verified User
"Do you interpret Justice Ginsburg's meaning of men and women as male and female?" Blackburn pressed. Jackson did not comment on the matter.

"Can you provide a definition for the word ‘woman?’" the senator asked.

"Can I provide a definition? No," Jackson responded. "I can't."

"You can't?" Blackburn asked.

"Not in this context, I'm not a biologist," the judge replied.

"Do you believe the meaning of the word woman is so unclear and controversial that you can't give me a definition?" Blackburn pressed.

"Senator, in my work as a judge, what I do is I address disputes. If there's a dispute about a definition, people make arguments, and I look at the law, and I decide," Jackson said.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ke...e-court-pick-refuses-to-define-the-word-woman
 
Just last week, an entire generation of young girls watched as our taxpayer-funded institutions permitted a biological man to compete [against] and beat a biological woman in the NCAA women's swimming championships," the senator added, referring to the controversial case of transgender swimmer Lia Thomas.

"What message do you think this sends to girls?"

"Senator, I'm not sure what message that sends. If you're asking me about the legal issues related to it, those are topics that are being hotly discussed, as you say, and could come to the Court, so I'm not able to" address them, the judge responded.
 
Poor Incels. So unsure of what a woman really is that they need a Supreme Court nominee and Harvard graduate to explain it to them. :laugh:
 
dukkha said:
"Do you interpret Justice Ginsburg's meaning of men and women as male and female?" Blackburn pressed. Jackson did not comment on the matter.

"Can you provide a definition for the word ‘woman?’" the senator asked.

"Can I provide a definition? No," Jackson responded. "I can't."

"You can't?" Blackburn asked.

"Not in this context, I'm not a biologist," the judge replied.

"Do you believe the meaning of the word woman is so unclear and controversial that you can't give me a definition?" Blackburn pressed.

"Senator, in my work as a judge, what I do is I address disputes. If there's a dispute about a definition, people make arguments, and I look at the law, and I decide," Jackson said.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ke...e-court-pick-refuses-to-define-the-word-woman
Click to expand...

Why is the definition of "men" and "female" so important for the SCOTUS?
 
dukkha said:
Just last week, an entire generation of young girls watched as our taxpayer-funded institutions permitted a biological man to compete [against] and beat a biological woman in the NCAA women's swimming championships," the senator added, referring to the controversial case of transgender swimmer Lia Thomas.

"What message do you think this sends to girls?"

"Senator, I'm not sure what message that sends. If you're asking me about the legal issues related to it, those are topics that are being hotly discussed, as you say, and could come to the Court, so I'm not able to" address them, the judge responded.
Click to expand...

So? Like she said, it could come to the court. Until then, the question is pointless. It's a bait and THEY KNOW IT.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Poor Incels. So unsure of what a woman really is that they need a Supreme Court nominee and Harvard graduate to explain it to them. :laugh:
Click to expand...
she needs to define WTF is a woman - not "explain"anything
Pretty basic stuff for a SCOTUS nominee unable to answer
 
dukkha said:
"Do you interpret Justice Ginsburg's meaning of men and women as male and female?" Blackburn pressed. Jackson did not comment on the matter.

"Can you provide a definition for the word ‘woman?’" the senator asked.

"Can I provide a definition? No," Jackson responded. "I can't."

"You can't?" Blackburn asked.

"Not in this context, I'm not a biologist," the judge replied.

"Do you believe the meaning of the word woman is so unclear and controversial that you can't give me a definition?" Blackburn pressed.

"Senator, in my work as a judge, what I do is I address disputes. If there's a dispute about a definition, people make arguments, and I look at the law, and I decide," Jackson said.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ke...e-court-pick-refuses-to-define-the-word-woman
Click to expand...

Even worse, she's Black!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
AProudLefty said:
She doesn't even know what it is so how can she be a big fan of it?
Click to expand...
^ cant fix stupid

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/pr...-jackson-has-drawn-heavily-from-crt-advocates
In speeches and writings, Judge Jackson has frequently cited leading advocates and ideas of Critical Race Theory (CRT).

Judge Jackson praised the late Derrick Bell, better known as the godfather of CRT, and his wife Janet Bell

She referred to his 1993 book, “Faces At The Bottom Of The Well: The Permanence Of Racism” as “essential reading” and “a pioneering contribution to critical race theory scholarship”
Judge Jackson claimed she has “drawn heavily” from leading CRT advocate Janet Bell

In a lecture, Judge Jackson highlighted the 1619 Project, which was repurposed into materials for K-12 students – originally claiming that the “true founding” of the U.S. began when the first slave ship arrived in the U.S.

Judge Jackson has revealed that she finds critical race theory to be an important component of sentencing

In a lecture, Judge Jackson revealed that she found sentencing “interesting on an intellectual level, in part because it melds together myriad types of law” including “constitutional law, critical race theory” and others
 
Do you interpret Justice Ginsburg's meaning of men and women as male and female?" Blackburn pressed. Jackson did not comment on the matter.

"Can you provide a definition for the word ‘woman?’" the senator asked.

"Can I provide a definition? No," Jackson responded. "I can't."

"You can't?" Blackburn asked.

"Not in this context, I'm not a biologist," the judge replied.
Click to expand...
ROFL
Im not one either. but I can define "woman"
 
dukkha said:
ROFL
it's a basic definition with all kinds of ramifications "minority" equity",and now Title 9

She doesn't have to say how she would rule -that's off limits -simply a definition
Click to expand...

What bearing does the definition have to do with being a Justice? Might as well ask what the definition of "cat" is.
 
She played it brilliantly, undercut the obvious trap

Pretty obvious the Republicans here are attempting to portray themselves as victims, voicing all the cultural “issues” they want center stage come next November, none of it has anything to do with Ketanji Brown Jackson

All of the theatrics are for Fox, they know she is over qualified, they even approved her earlier nomination 53-44 last year, all orchestrated drama
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top