Insurance company cleans up - thanks, Democrats!

Big Money

New member
obama.gif


Humana announced that it expects to tap the three risk adjustment mechanisms in ObamaCare for between $250 and $450 million in 2014.


This amounts to about 25 percent of the insurer’s expected exchange revenue.


This money is needed to offset losses that the insurer will take as a result of slower enrollment in its ObamaCare plans, and a skewed risk pool that weighs more heavily toward older and less healthy members than it originally budgeted.


More than half of the money will come from the $25 billion reinsurance pool that ObamaCare provides (collected through a tax on employer-sponsored health plans).


The other half will come mostly from the risk corridors. Humana is expected to book the money as revenue to offset shortfalls between what it collects in exchange premiums and pays out in medical claims.


Humana said that it had enrolled 202,000 people on its exchange-based health plans as of January 31st, of which 82 percent were eligible for subsidies.


Among the other nuggets that Humana offered: Most people (58%) are selecting silver plans, but not as many as the insurer originally anticipated.


Cost sharing subsidies only attach to silver plans.


These are extra subsidies designed to offset out of pocket costs for consumers who fall between 150% and 250% of the Federal poverty level.


The tilt toward silver plans suggests that the exchanges are still drawing heavily from this income demographic — but not as heavily as expected.


Finally, the mix of people enrolling in Humana plans still skews toward older individuals.


Only 20 percent of enrollees are below the age of 30,while 42 percent are aged 50-64.





http://www.forbes.com/sites/scottgottlieb/2014/02/06/obamacare-bailout-for-one-insurer-450-million-in-2014/
 
I blame the Republicans for fighting against the public option.

So it wasn't the poorly written half assed legislation Democrats passed along straight party lines without input from the Republicans and passed by lawmakers who declared they didn't know what was in the bill until after it passed to blame?

One thing we can be certain of from partisan dunces like you; it's never your guys fault.

Stunning.
 
So it wasn't the poorly written half assed legislation Democrats passed along straight party lines without input from the Republicans and passed by lawmakers who declared they didn't know what was in the bill until after it passed to blame?

One thing we can be certain of from partisan dunces like you; it's never your guys fault.

Stunning.

Well, its better than what we had, and clearly its not perfect. I am all for reforming it.
 
so a bill/law designed to provide millions of people quality health care while allowing those who liked their plan to keep it, also to rein in the profits of health insurance companies that liberals claimed were abusing their clientele for the sake of money, are now dropping peoples coverage, being given exemptions to skirt the new laws anyway, and raking in hundreds of millions more money is better than what we had before? please explain.
 
so a bill/law designed to provide millions of people quality health care while allowing those who liked their plan to keep it, also to rein in the profits of health insurance companies that liberals claimed were abusing their clientele for the sake of money, are now dropping peoples coverage, being given exemptions to skirt the new laws anyway, and raking in hundreds of millions more money is better than what we had before? please explain.

Yes, Counselor, please do.
 
Well, its better than what we had, and clearly its not perfect. I am all for reforming it.

So you say; many would disagree. Obama will easily win one of the worst Presidencies in history.

But your brain is too tiny to actually comprehend anything beyond the DNC pabulum you are being spoonfed.
 
Back
Top