In Colorado, some counties seem a bit upset over SB-003 restricting guns... Anyone ever hear of 2nd Amendment Sanctuary?

Damocles

Accedo!
Staff member

WHEREAS, the Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land; and

WHEREAS, the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States states: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed"; and

WHEREAS, Article II, Section 13 of the Constitution of the State of Colorado also provides: “The right of no person to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person and property…shall be called in question” notwithstanding regulations on concealed carry; and

WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) affirmed that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms for self-defense, and in McDonald v. Chicago (2010) held that this right is incorporated against the states through the Fourteenth Amendment; and

WHEREAS, the Board recognizes the anti-commandeering doctrine, as upheld in Printz v. United States (1997), which prohibits compelling local officials to enforce unconstitutional state or federal laws; and

WHEREAS, the Bent County Board of Commissioners has sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Colorado; and

WHEREAS, Colorado Senate Bill 003 (SB-003), signed into law on April 10, 2025, introduces significant restrictions on the manufacture, sale, and purchase of specified semiautomatic firearms, including:

  • Prohibiting the manufacture, distribution, transfer, sale, or purchase of semiautomatic rifles, shotguns, and gas-operated handguns with detachable magazines, unless the purchaser obtains a "firearms safety course eligibility card" after completing a state-approved safety course;
  • Requiring individuals to complete a background check and a firearms safety course to obtain the eligibility card, with the course focusing on gun safety, mental health considerations, and Colorado's red flag law;
  • Granting sheriffs the authority to deny or revoke eligibility cards based on a "reasonable belief" that the applicant may pose a danger to themselves or others;
and

WHEREAS, the Bent County Board of Commissioners believes that SB-003 infringes upon the constitutionally protected rights of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms, imposes undue burdens on lawful firearm ownership, and constitutes an overreach of legislative authority; and

WHEREAS, the Board recognizes and affirms the rights of individual citizens to lawfully keep and bear arms, as guaranteed by the United States and Colorado Constitutions.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Bent County, Colorado, as follows:

  1. Declaration of Second Amendment Sanctuary
    Bent County hereby declares itself to be a Second Amendment Sanctuary County.
  2. Opposition to SB-003
    The Bent County Board of Commissioners hereby expresses its opposition to the passage and enforcement of SB-003 or any similar legislation that would infringe upon the constitutionally protected rights of its citizens to keep and bear arms.
  3. Non-Participation in Unconstitutional Measures
    The Board affirms that any law—state or federal—that infringes upon rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States is null and void and holds no lawful authority, consistent with Marbury v. Madison (1803) and Norton v. Shelby County (1886). Accordingly, no county resources—whether financial, personnel, or facilities—will be used to enforce or comply with firearm restrictions imposed by SB-003 or similar legislation, unless such law has been upheld as constitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States, which this Board recognizes as the final authority on the Second Amendment. The Board further acknowledges the anti-commandeering doctrine affirmed in Printz v. United States (1997), which prohibits the federal or state governments from compelling local officials to administer or enforce federal or state laws, particularly those not affirmed as constitutional by the Supreme Court.
Sheriff’s Enforcement
The Bent County Sheriff will not enforce provisions of SB-003, or similar legislation, that infringe upon the Second Amendment rights of citizens, to the extent permitted under the Constitution and applicable law.

  1. Support for Lawful Gun Ownership
    The County supports and upholds the rights of law-abiding citizens to own, possess, and use firearms for lawful purposes, including but not limited to self-defense, hunting, and recreational shooting.
  2. Distribution
    A copy of this Resolution shall be sent to the Governor of Colorado, the Colorado General Assembly, and to all relevant state and federal agencies as evidence of the County's stance.


PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of May, 2025, by the Board of County Commissioners of Bent County, Colorado.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Bent County, Colorado
 
  • Prohibiting the manufacture, distribution, transfer, sale, or purchase of semiautomatic rifles, shotguns, and gas-operated handguns with detachable magazines, unless the purchaser obtains a "firearms safety course eligibility card" after completing a state-approved safety course;

Anyone who currently owns any firearm or magazine that meets that standard could sue the state for loss of value as they can no longer sell their existing firearms or magazines. That constitutes a 'taking' and would meet the requirement of Eminent Domain and they could force the government to purchase those items at fair market value. This could literally bankrupt the state if everyone started doing that.
Forcing a current owner to pay for the "eligibility card" could be treated the same way. The current owner could sue the state for the loss (cost) incurred.
Then there's the ex post facto angle. The state has suddenly made something illegal that was previously legal and hasn't provided compensation for that loss. Big problem there.
  • Requiring individuals to complete a background check and a firearms safety course to obtain the eligibility card, with the course focusing on gun safety, mental health considerations, and Colorado's red flag law;

This puts an onerous restriction on Right and is unconstitutional and has been previously slapped down before. The only way it might--might--work is if the state makes the requirements free of charge and does not keep a record of participants who get such an eligibility card. Again, it's likely to bankrupt Colorado if that were allowed. Making the requirements something people have to pay out-of-pocket for has already been struck down as illegal.




  • Granting sheriffs the authority to deny or revoke eligibility cards based on a "reasonable belief" that the applicant may pose a danger to themselves or others;

Same thing. New York just got smacked down for this. Because the granting authority can give or deny a permit on basically their opinion and a whim, this sort of law won't stand up in a legal test.
 
Back
Top