Ilhan Omar is reportedly sounding out donors about a prospective run for the U.S. Senate

Trump should send the FBI to get a DNA sample on her brother/ex-husband.


On what grounds?

In the United States, the authority of the President to order the FBI or any other federal agency to collect someone's DNA without their consent is a complex matter constrained by several legal frameworks:

  1. Fourth Amendment: The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. Collecting DNA without consent would generally be considered a search under this amendment, requiring probable cause and typically a warrant issued by a judge.
    • Exceptions: There are exceptions where law enforcement might not need a warrant, such as in cases of exigent circumstances or if the DNA is in plain view or abandoned. However, these exceptions are narrowly interpreted by courts.
  2. Judicial Oversight: Even if the President or any executive branch official wanted to initiate such an action, the involvement of the judiciary would be necessary. A judge would need to approve the collection if it's against someone's will, based on probable cause related to a crime.
  3. Legislation: There are laws and regulations governing DNA collection, like:
    • DNA Identification Act of 1994, which allows for DNA collection from federal offenders but with specific conditions.
    • Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) of 2008, which, while not directly addressing law enforcement, underscores the privacy concerns around genetic information.
  4. Executive Orders: While the President can issue executive orders, these must align with existing laws. An executive order cannot override constitutional protections or existing federal statutes concerning privacy and rights.
  5. FBI's Policies: The FBI operates under policies and procedures that would require legal justification before they could engage in such activities. There are internal guidelines and oversight mechanisms to ensure compliance with the law.

  • Practical Considerations: Even if legally possible under some extraordinary circumstances, the political and public backlash, along with potential legal challenges, would make such an order contentious and likely invalidated in court.

In summary, without consent, a President could not simply order the FBI to collect someone's DNA. This action would need to pass through the legal system, with probable cause established, a warrant obtained, and all actions conforming to constitutional and statutory law. The judiciary acts as a check on executive power in such matters, ensuring that individual rights are protected.


@Grok
 
Trump should send the FBI to get a DNA sample on her brother/ex-husband.
You would need probable cause to seize her DNA, when you have the opposite of probable cause. Why wouldn't her supposed brother have immigrated with the rest of the family? How did her supposed brother get born in England, when her parents never were in England?

Rather than having probable cause you have practically impossible.

But I am more than willing to see Omar's DNA taken, if we can also take trump's DNA and make it available for whatever civil or criminal case it might be needed/wanted in. We all know that is a very bad deal for trump.
 
Back
Top