I told you this would be bigger then Exxon Valdez

I told you this would be bigger then Exxon Valdez
Click to expand...

Wow, check out the brain on Mott.

But, to be honest and modest, it's not hard to be right when your debate opponents are wingnuts who are easily duped by Iraq War lies, climate gate comedy, deregulation fantasies, and British Petroleum corporate propoganda.
 
Cypress said:
Wow, check out the brain on Mott.

But, to be honest and modest, it's not hard to be right when your debate opponents are wingnuts who are easily duped by Iraq War lies, climate gate comedy, deregulation fantasies, and British Petroleum corporate propoganda.
Click to expand...

Wow, you're in fantasy land. you forgot to call us racist tea-baggers and you didn't mention anything about the arizona law. You fail, libtard

Go back to your left wing blogs to figure out a response, you fucking idiot

OH boy, Mott! You were able to predict that an oil spill would be bad. Good for you. You're so fucking clever. I bet a third grader would have had a hard time making a similar prediction.
 
tinfoil said:
Wow, you're in fantasy land. you forgot to call us racist tea-baggers and you didn't mention anything about the arizona law. You fail, libtard

Go back to your left wing blogs to figure out a response, you fucking idiot

OH boy, Mott! You were able to predict that an oil spill would be bad. Good for you. You're so fucking clever. I bet a third grader would have had a hard time making a similar prediction.
Click to expand...

Why don't you talk about the tax bill for this when all is said & done? You always seemed so concerned about higher taxes for what is basically minimal investment in alternative technologies...why no concern now?
 
tinfoil said:
Wow, you're in fantasy land. you forgot to call us racist tea-baggers and you didn't mention anything about the arizona law. You fail, libtard

Go back to your left wing blogs to figure out a response, you fucking idiot

OH boy, Mott! You were able to predict that an oil spill would be bad. Good for you. You're so fucking clever. I bet a third grader would have had a hard time making a similar prediction.
Click to expand...
Where did you get your GED again? :pke:
 
Scratch that last question, btw, tinfoil - I figured out the answer. It's because you have become an insufferable right-wing hack & shill.
 
Cypress said:
Wow, check out the brain on Mott.

But, to be honest and modest, it's not hard to be right when your debate opponents are wingnuts who are easily duped by Iraq War lies, climate gate comedy, deregulation fantasies, and British Petroleum corporate propoganda.
Click to expand...
But they love freedom, and Jesus too.
 
NigelTufnel said:
Well, Superfreak was one. It is one of those dumbass threads talking about natural seepage from the ocean floor.
Click to expand...

If I remember correctly, I didn't state it WOULDN'T reach Exxon levels, I stated how long it would based on the estimates. I stated it would take several months of leaking in those threads to reach the Exxon levels. That was based on the 5000 brls per day estimates we had at that time. So do try to be at least a little bit honest.

As for the seepage, yes, we get it.... you don't want any information that goes against your position of 'oil drilling in ocean....baaaaad'. We understand completely how much of a partisan douche bag that you are. No need to continually try to prove to us how much of a brain dead lemming you wish to be.
 
In light of recent events, I don't think there is anything partisan about opposing offshore drilling.

At this point, it's merely common sense.
 
Onceler said:
Yeah, I remember the big debate about "seepage."

Man, does that look dumb now...
Click to expand...

Really.... do elaborate.

Absolutely NOTHING about the seepage has changed.

The only factor that changed is the pace of the Horizon leak. The Coast Guard said 5000 brls (though they said it was hard to tell and thus not to rely on their estimate) and we have the independent government group that has three estimates from roughly 10000 brls per day to 25000 (which should tell you that they also have no idea).
 
Onceler said:
In light of recent events, I don't think there is anything partisan about opposing offshore drilling.

At this point, it's merely common sense.
Click to expand...

no...accidents happen, we just need to do everything we can to ensure they don't happen again...we will find out what happen here and not make that same mistake

you're just looking at this emotionally, you've been that way on this issue from the start
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top