Hypocrisy….

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
Colleges can’t discriminate to favor minorities.

Business can exclude minorities.
 
1. the fault of this decision lies directly with harvard and UNC for failing to provide measurable objectives
2. you can always use the fallback position of boycotting...............if a business wants to exclude a demographic, don't fucking do business there.
 
Colleges can’t discriminate to favor minorities.

Business can exclude minorities.

The thinking pattern you show us daily is very child like and rudimentary. Its not rocket science Jarod. One case is clearly giving an advantage to one group of people based purely on race. The other case isnt giving the target an advantage or disadvantage,.....they are simply choosing AS IS THEIR RIGHT not to deal with them at all. As a side bar....... Most of the posters in here who use the ignore feature happen to be of the left. This means they agree with choosing AS IS THEIR RIGHT not to deal with certain posters/people at all. Hypocrisy? Yes,....YES INDEED. ;)
 
Last edited:
Colleges can’t discriminate to favor minorities.

Business can exclude minorities.

Get it right...colleges that receive public funding can't discriminate to favor minorities.

Businesses can exclude redheads, if they prefer to.

Summary judgment against the dummy, Jarod.

The way to end discrimination is to stop discriminating.

The Supreme Court lo dijo (said it).
 
Last edited:
Colleges can’t discriminate to favor minorities.

Business can exclude minorities.

A business is private owned ..owner can do what he wants its his money

Harvard got $22.2 million from from the U.S. Department of Education...money from white black and Asian pockets...They cant can't discriminate to favor anyone!


You are a fucking goddamn IDIOT!
 
Last edited:
Get it right...colleges that receive public funding can't discriminate to favor minorities.

Businesses can exclude redheads, if they prefer to.

Summary judgment against the dummy, Jarod.

The way to end discrimination is to stop discriminating.

The Supreme Court lo dijo (said it).
Indeed. Set academic standards and admit people that meet those standards don't admit those that don't meet them. Harvard has a HUGE endowment so set up scholarships for economically disadvantaged students.
 
At least Clarence Thomas benefitted from affirmative action before he pulled up the ladder behind him.


Keep up the lies.

Thomas was not admitted under LOWERED ACADEMIC STANDARDS....as in the case of current AA.

He was admitted for his qualifications, including being black.

That is NOT "affirmative action", which is admitting someone based on race over qualifications,.
 
Keep up the lies.

Thomas was not admitted under LOWERED ACADEMIC STANDARDS....as in the case of current AA.

He was admitted for his qualifications, including being black.

That is NOT "affirmative action", which is admitting someone based on race over qualifications,.

Thomas said in the 80s, he wondered where he would be if it weren't for Affirmative Action. You are wrong.
 
Keep up the lies.

Thomas was not admitted under LOWERED ACADEMIC STANDARDS....as in the case of current AA.

He was admitted for his qualifications, including being black.

That is NOT "affirmative action", which is admitting someone based on race over qualifications,.
Daddy helped get Hunter into Yale.
 
At least Clarence Thomas benefitted from affirmative action before he pulled up the ladder behind him.

I understand your belief that blacks will never be smart enough to do anything without a boost up........and what I understand about it is that you're an ignorant, racist fuck......
 
Back
Top