Housing starts surge

The Dude

Banned
Good News Keeps Coming for Housing as Starts Surge
Published: Tuesday, 20 Nov 2012 | 9:30 AM ET Text
U.S. housing starts rose to their highest rate in more than four years in October, suggesting the housing market recovery was gaining steam, even though permits for future construction fell.


AP
The Commerce Department said on Tuesday housing starts increased 3.6 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 894,000 units — the highest since July 2008. Economists had expected groundbreaking to slow to an 840,000-unit rate.

The department said superstorm Sandy, which slammed the East Coast in late October, had a minimal impact on the data. Groundbreaking in the Northeast, which fell 6.5 percent last month, accounted for about 8 percent of overall housing starts.

"We expect to see further strength in the housing market next year, driven by the multifamily sector. Home values are rising, which will help the low-growth economy we have," said Sam Bullard, a senior economist at Wells Fargo Securities in Charlotte, North Carolina.

The housing market has turned around after an unprecedented collapse that landed the economy in its worst recession since the Great Depression. The recovery, marked by rising home sales, prices and building activity is being driven by pent-up demand against the backdrop of record low mortgage rates. (Read More: Builders Bump Up Thanks to Drop in Existing Home Supply)

The Federal Reserve has targeted housing as a channel to boost growth, announcing in September that it would buy $40 billion in mortgage-backed securities per month until the outlook for employment improved substantially.

A steady rise in the number of U.S. households, which fell during the 2007-09 recession as financially strapped Americans moved in with family and friends, is propping housing.




Economists at Goldman Sachs estimate that household formation — the net increase in the number of households each year — will increase to a 1.2 million rate in 2013 from 1 million currently.

They forecast housing starts rising to a 1 million rate by the end of next year and 1.5 million by the end of 2016.

Adding to GDP

Groundbreaking for new homes has risen 41.9 percent over the last year, but starts remain about 60 percent below the peak of 2.27 million reached in January 2006.

Homebuilding is expected to add to gross domestic product growth this year for the first time since 2005. (Read More: Could Housing Be the Antidote to the 'Fiscal Cliff'?)

Though home construction accounts for about 2.5 percent of GDP, economists estimate that for every new house built, at least three new jobs are created.

Last month, groundbreaking for single-family homes, the largest segment of the market, eased 0.2 percent to a 594,000-unit pace. Starts for multi-family homes surged 11.9 percent to a 300,000-unit rate, partly reflecting increased demand for rental apartments.

Building permits fell 2.7 percent to an 866,000-unit pace in October after jumping 11.1 percent the prior month, in line with expectations. The drop last month was concentrated in the multifamily segment and is likely to be short-lived.

A report on Monday showed confidence among homebuilders hit its highest level in 6-1/2 years in November.

Permits to build single-family homes rose 2.2 percent last month to a 562,000-unit pace. Permits for multi-family homes fell 10.6 percent to a 304,000-unit rate.
 
What's this?

More good economic news that corroborates evidence that Obama's policies are indeed turning the economy around?

Well NO WONDER not a one of the board Righties wanted to comment.

This actually got posted yesterday I believe and Dungheap commented this is the result of the QE3 policy of the Fed, not necessarily of Obama's doing. There was a short discussion on that which followed. If you disagree with Dung on that I'm open to hearing why as I believe it to be an interesting topic.
 
This actually got posted yesterday I believe and Dungheap commented this is the result of the QE3 policy of the Fed, not necessarily of Obama's doing. There was a short discussion on that which followed. If you disagree with Dung on that I'm open to hearing why as I believe it to be an interesting topic.
I agree. If anything, QE3 acted as a stimulus to free up money.

Now, the question remains as to whether the paper that the FED is gobbling up is going to be worthless again, or will there be stricter oversight? Did banks unload leftover toxic garbage on the FED, in order to write new business?

And why do people suddenly have money to build? The economy hasn't picked up to the point where people who didn't have the money 6 months ago, now have it.

Banks haven't been stingy with mortgage money for those with good credit. I just hope this doesn't open the floodgates to stupid lending practices again.
 
And the broader point, is that it is still a buyer's market. You cannot build a house for the same money you can buy an existing home for. And there are millions of existing homes on the market. So I wonder if there's some stimulus for new homes, as opposed to existing?
 
It is still a low number. You guys pick a starting point somewhere in the trench and then cheer an increase. The report even states the increase is likely to be short lived.

It has little to do with Obama and more to do with demographics. There will not likely be a sustained recovery in housing until 2018. You guys are almost as shameful in your hackery as ditzy.
 
Last edited:
It is still a low number. You guys pick a starting point somewhere in the trench and then cheer an increase. The report even states the increase is likely to be short lived.

It has little to do with Obama and more to do with demographics. There will not likely be a sustained recovery in housing until 2008. You guys are almost as shameful in your hackery as ditzy.

Did you mean 2018?
 
Back
Top