house republicans demonstrate why there is a republican war on women minorities

so Republicans passed protection for women, which was only supported by 6 Democrats and Obama pledges to veto and it's somehow evidence that Republicans are against women?......how does this work in your mind?.....

here's the truth of the matter...from your link above...
The Senate adds language that explicitly mentions gay and transgender Americans for protection, while the House version is gender neutral.
Click to expand...
so, it isn't a war on women, it's a war on gays and transgenders....

The House bill does not include a Senate provision that would allow Native American women to take American citizens who abuse them to court within the tribal legal system. Republicans say that the Senate measure is unconstitutional and replace it with a proposal that allows Native American women to apply for protection orders from local US courts.
Click to expand...

so, it isn't a war on women, it's a war on the tribal legal system....

The House bill does not allow for a path to citizenship for illegal women who have been abused and agree to cooperate with the police investigation of the crime.
Click to expand...

so, it isn't a war on women, it's a war on illegal aliens....

I'm glad we cleared that up......
 
The House bill does not include a Senate provision that would allow Native American women to take American citizens who abuse them to court within the tribal legal system.

The House bill does not allow for a path to citizenship for illegal women who have been abused and agree to cooperate with the police investigation of the crime.



Where do democrats come up with this shit, and why do gay men need to be included in the Violence Against Women Act?
 
webbway said:
The House bill does not include a Senate provision that would allow Native American women to take American citizens who abuse them to court within the tribal legal system.

The House bill does not allow for a path to citizenship for illegal women who have been abused and agree to cooperate with the police investigation of the crime.



Where do democrats come up with this shit, and why do gay men need to be included in the Violence Against Women Act?
Click to expand...


The real question is why you harbor so much hate for so many of your fellow citizens that you would deny them the same rights you enjoy...that's the REAL question.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
The real question is why you harbor so much hate for so many of your fellow citizens that you would deny them the same rights you enjoy...that's the REAL question.
Click to expand...

The House bill does not include a Senate provision that would allow Native American women to take American citizens who abuse them to court within the tribal legal system.

right now, native american women that are abused on a reservation have no recourse

The House bill does not allow for a path to citizenship for illegal women who have been abused and agree to cooperate with the police investigation of the crime.

right now, mail order brides cannot seek help if their spouses abuse them if they have not yet become citizens, if they complain they will get deported after they testify and illegal immigrant women have the same problem Where do democrats come up with this shit, and why do gay men need to be included in the Violence Against Women Act?

the act should read - violence against spouses act - to protest both spouses from violence

zappa is right, you do hate a lot of people - why
 
The House bill does not include a Senate provision that would allow Native American women to take American citizens who abuse them to court within the tribal legal system.

If the act was committed on indian land then they should be tried under the indian nations rules.
 
Don Quixote said:
what rights are you talking about
Click to expand...
ask darla. she's quite happy to deny 2nd Amendment rights to people. Also happy to deny 4th and 5th Amendment rights to those who exercise their 1st and 2nd Amendment rights. I don't see anyone calling her out. y'all should clean up your own house before calling out other houses.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
ask darla. she's quite happy to deny 2nd Amendment rights to people. Also happy to deny 4th and 5th Amendment rights to those who exercise their 1st and 2nd Amendment rights. I don't see anyone calling her out. y'all should clean up your own house before calling out other houses.
Click to expand...

since i am not darla, try cleaning up your own house and let her clean up her own, 'all' liberals are not alike - besides, i am a social progressive and a fiscal conservative - put that in your bong and smoke it
 
Don Quixote said:
since i am not darla, try cleaning up your own house and let her clean up her own, 'all' liberals are not alike - besides, i am a social progressive and a fiscal conservative - put that in your bong and smoke it
Click to expand...
you asked me what rights, don't come back with an 'i'm not my darlas keeper' message. If you didn't care to know, shouldn't have asked. and yes, all liberals are alike. they claim to be for freedom, but in reality they are statists. YOU, as a socially progressive yet fiscally conservative individual, should check out Libertarianism. That is, as long as you're not afraid of others having freedom.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
you asked me what rights, don't come back with an 'i'm not my darlas keeper' message. If you didn't care to know, shouldn't have asked. and yes, all liberals are alike. they claim to be for freedom, but in reality they are statists. YOU, as a socially progressive yet fiscally conservative individual, should check out Libertarianism. That is, as long as you're not afraid of others having freedom.
Click to expand...

so you are dodging my question

as for libertarianism, i have and it sucks, it is the party of i am all right and to hell with the rest of society
 
SmarterthanYou said:
yes, your words. you said you were a social progressive. normally 'progressives' are for expanding the RIGHTS of people, but you want to expand entitlements, not rights, therefore you're a socialist. your words, not mine. and what question do you think I dodged?
Click to expand...

what rights have i said others cannot have?
 
Don Quixote said:
what rights have i said others cannot have?
Click to expand...
right off, I don't remember, but we were talking about darla, remember? If need be, I'll research your previous posts and pay more attention to your future posts and see if you wish to deny other people their rights. at this point, I don't remember you doing that. that is to your credit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top