This is the woman who the wiki leaks emails prove is corrupt to the core, so what does Hillary do? Gives her a fat promotion:
: In an astounding turn of events, Hillary Clinton has just announced that her campaign has hired Wasserman Schultz to be head of its fifty-state outreach program. To so publicly endorse and reward a person now at the epicenter of a national scandal ― one that threatens the reputation of the Democratic Party and its primary process ― and to do so on the eve of the most critical Party-unity pageant of this century, may be one of the worst political judgments of the last few election cycles. When else has a major-party nominee so repeatedly poked 43% of her own party ― i.e., her primary opponent’s supporters ― in the eye?]
By the time you read this, Debbie Wasserman Schultz may already have resigned or been fired as head of the Democratic National Committee.
But that’s an insufficient response to WikiLeaks’ recent release of more than 20,000 DNC emails ― emails which confirm that certain aspects of the 2016 Democratic primary were in fact rigged against Bernie Sanders.
It appears that Sanders spending the last quarter-century caucusing and voting with Democrats ― and at several points ensuring their majority in the U.S. Senate ― wasn’t enough for the Democratic Party. Apparently, the fact that Sanders was until recently a political independent, and therefore didn’t raise as much money for the Democrats as he might have, was enough of a concern at the DNC that officials there did all they could to ensure his defeat in the party’s primary.
Wasserman Schultz herself sent profanity-laced emails angrily dismissing Sanders campaign manager; another DNC official conspired to raise Sanders’ religious beliefs ― the Senator is Jewish, but non-practicing ― as a means of suppressing support for him among practicing Christians in West Virginia and Kentucky. DNC staffers discussed how best to leak anti-Sanders articles in ways untraceable to the Committee. And that was just the tip of the iceberg, as a deeper dive into the WikiLeaks emails reveals.
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57950603e4b0e002a313998b
: In an astounding turn of events, Hillary Clinton has just announced that her campaign has hired Wasserman Schultz to be head of its fifty-state outreach program. To so publicly endorse and reward a person now at the epicenter of a national scandal ― one that threatens the reputation of the Democratic Party and its primary process ― and to do so on the eve of the most critical Party-unity pageant of this century, may be one of the worst political judgments of the last few election cycles. When else has a major-party nominee so repeatedly poked 43% of her own party ― i.e., her primary opponent’s supporters ― in the eye?]
By the time you read this, Debbie Wasserman Schultz may already have resigned or been fired as head of the Democratic National Committee.
But that’s an insufficient response to WikiLeaks’ recent release of more than 20,000 DNC emails ― emails which confirm that certain aspects of the 2016 Democratic primary were in fact rigged against Bernie Sanders.
It appears that Sanders spending the last quarter-century caucusing and voting with Democrats ― and at several points ensuring their majority in the U.S. Senate ― wasn’t enough for the Democratic Party. Apparently, the fact that Sanders was until recently a political independent, and therefore didn’t raise as much money for the Democrats as he might have, was enough of a concern at the DNC that officials there did all they could to ensure his defeat in the party’s primary.
Wasserman Schultz herself sent profanity-laced emails angrily dismissing Sanders campaign manager; another DNC official conspired to raise Sanders’ religious beliefs ― the Senator is Jewish, but non-practicing ― as a means of suppressing support for him among practicing Christians in West Virginia and Kentucky. DNC staffers discussed how best to leak anti-Sanders articles in ways untraceable to the Committee. And that was just the tip of the iceberg, as a deeper dive into the WikiLeaks emails reveals.
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_57950603e4b0e002a313998b