Heeeeeeeeerrsss MUELLER !

"In a cordial and professional conversation, the Special Counsel emphasized that nothing in the Attorney General's March 24 letter was inaccurate or misleading. But, he expressed frustration over the lack of context and the resulting media coverage regarding the Special Counsel's obstruction analysis," she added.
 
"In a cordial and professional conversation, the Special Counsel emphasized that nothing in the Attorney General's March 24 letter was inaccurate or misleading. But, he expressed frustration over the lack of context and the resulting media coverage regarding the Special Counsel's obstruction analysis," she added.

Which is irrelevant to Barr lying about this under oath to Congress.

What's it like? Sucking on a perjurer's cock?
 
"In a cordial and professional conversation, the Special Counsel emphasized that nothing in the Attorney General's March 24 letter was inaccurate or misleading. But, he expressed frustration over the lack of context and the resulting media coverage regarding the Special Counsel's obstruction analysis," she added.


Misleading and mischaracterizing is a type of willful lying.

I wonder why Trump's attorney general lied about the content of the Mueller Report?

On a similar tangent, did Janet Reno write a summary, include redactions, and do a press conference to spin the Ken Starr report before it came out??
 
Misleading and mischaracterizing is a type of willful lying.

I wonder why Trump's attorney general lied about the content of the Mueller Report?

On a similar tangent, did Janet Reno write a summary, include redactions, and do a press conference to spin the Ken Starr report before it came out??

Can you read? :palm:
 
Barr has testified to Congress previously that Mueller declined the opportunity to review his four-page memo to lawmakers that distilled the essence of the special counsel’s findings.

In his letter to Barr, Mueller wrote that the redaction process “need not delay release of the enclosed materials. Release at this time would alleviate the misunderstandings that have arisen and would answer congressional and public questions about the nature and outcome of our investigation.”

When Barr pressed Mueller on whether he thought Barr’s memo to Congress was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not but felt that the media coverage of it was misinterpreting the investigation, officials said.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.cf7b354cee50
 
Can you read? :palm:
Willfully leaving out important context is mischaracterizing in my book, aka lying.

You are not a person I place any credibility on when it comes to the topic of lying - as you have been banned from this board for willfully (and falsely) accusing another poster of being a pedophile.
 
Willfully leaving out important context is mischaracterizing in my book, aka lying.

You are not a person I place any credibility on when it comes to the topic of lying - as you have been banned from this board for willfully (and falsely) accusing another poster of being a pedophile.

You couldn't read then either. You want to go there? Are there any restrictions here in this forum about rehashing ban incidents?

Talk about missing the context!!! HA! What irony! You blew it back then as did the one who can dish it out but can't take it.
The context of that thread was all about a certain presidential candidate who was shown by videos and photos to be a child porn pedo guy. Remaining in context of the thread which 12b states must occur.....it was the child porn pedo character who should be enjoyed by his defender.

Are you under the misconception that if any of us who agree with and defend a character who is the topic of a thread, that means we are NOT like-minded with that character?
Just as if any of us who do NOT agree with and NOT defend a character who is the topic of a thread, that means we ARE like-minded with that character?
The answer to both of those logic-based questions is NO.

Again, one has to be sober and intelligent enough to follow the thread topic and its subject (character up for discussion) as 12b requires.
After over 2 years of never once calling another poster in here a name of any kind, cussed someone out, called them a vulgar name...all of a sudden I decided "what the heck, why not?"
Even after making mistakes, mistaken someone's identity or misunderstood something, I immediately always say the words "I apologize" and move on, never bringing it up again.

Your pattern of behavior is typical of the left. Beat something into the ground, never let it go, whine, moan, complain, stomp your feet like babies because a little election or anything else doesn't go your way, run for a safe space and get someone to punish the thing or person who disagrees with you.
You can dish it out, but ya'll can't take it.
What do ya know.....got all the way to the end and still have no desire to call even YOU a name. LOL Peace! :cool:
 
this one is hilarious even for fake news.

Mueller did not like the way the media characterized the report findings - not the Barr summary.
No matter
The LW loons are saying Barr mis-characterized Mueller..

Dems are amazing in their ability to ignore basic facts like the border crisis etc.
 
this one is hilarious even for fake news.

Mueller did not like the way the media characterized the report findings - not the Barr summary.
No matter
The LW loons are saying Barr mis-characterized Mueller..

Dems are amazing in their ability to ignore basic facts like the border crisis etc.

Poor reading and comprehension skills...shame they can vote. :laugh:
 
"In a cordial and professional conversation, the Special Counsel emphasized that nothing in the Attorney General's March 24 letter was inaccurate or misleading. But, he expressed frustration over the lack of context and the resulting media coverage regarding the Special Counsel's obstruction analysis," she added.
lol..Mueller wants it soo many ways, won't indict or refer for indict, but turns it over to Barr -
and when pressed sezs Barr did NOT MISREPRESENT, but then complains about the ..what.. how the summary characterized the report? by the media?? what??

Mueller is a snake in the grass - just like Comey- who won't indict
but will release a prosecutorial investigation conclusion. Character assassination.

Forget him. he's finished his work and did not indict or refer to indict or claim criminal behavior
 
lol..Mueller wants it soo many ways, won't indict or refer for indict, but turns it over to Barr -
and when pressed sezs Barr did NOT MISREPRESENT, but then complains about the ..what.. how the summary characterized the report? by the media?? what??

Mueller is a snake n the grass - just like Comey- who won't indict
but will release a prosecutorial investigation conclusion. Character assassination

Barr even offered his report to Mullet for a final review, but Mullet declined. Guy's a snake.
 
Back
Top