Gunman had 'bump-stock' device that could speed fire

USFREEDOM911

MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Gunman had 'bump-stock' device that could speed fire

76f925e4867b458998eeb38e10ef7c99.jpg


The devices have attracted scrutiny in recent years from authorities.

California Sen. Dianne Feinstein has long railed against them. Several years ago, she told The Associated Press she was concerned about the emergence of new technologies that could retrofit firearms to make them fully automatic.

"This replacement shoulder stock turns a semi-automatic rifle into a weapon that can fire at a rate of 400 to 800 rounds per minute," she said.

A semi-automatic weapon requires one trigger pull for each round fired. With a fully automatic firearm, one trigger pull can unleash continuous rounds until the magazine is empty.

The purchasing of fully automatic weapons has been significantly restricted in the U.S. since the 1930s.

In 1986, the federal National Firearms Act was amended further to prohibit the transfer or possession of machine guns by civilians, with an exception for those previously manufactured and registered.

Numerous attempts to design retrofits failed until recent years when bump stocks came on the market.

The device basically replaces the gun's shoulder rest, with a "support step" that covers the trigger opening. By holding the pistol grip with one hand and pushing forward on the barrel with the other, the shooter's finger comes in contact with the trigger. The recoil causes the gun to buck back and forth, "bumping" the trigger.

Technically, that means the finger is pulling the trigger for each round fired, keeping the weapon a legal semi-automatic.

Las Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock had 23 guns in his hotel room.

Two officials familiar with the investigation told the AP that Paddock had two bump stocks. They are investigating whether those stocks were used to modify weapons used in the massacre, according to the officials, who were briefed by law enforcement and spoke on condition of anonymity because the investigation is still unfolding.

Paddock killed 59 people and wounded hundreds more at a country music festival near his hotel. Police stormed his 32nd floor hotel room and found that he had killed himself after committing the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history.

---------------------------------------------------

This could explain why people thought the shooter was using an "automatic" firearm.
 
Many of us thought this had to be bump stocks. A couple of things. Yes they can increase the rapidity of shooting, but the reality is that even with a bump stock he would have been unlikely to shoot 4-800 rounds per minute. For one he didn’t have anything that that could have fed that many bullets into the gun. Secondly I don’t think the guns he had could have handled the heat generated from 4-800 rounds a minute

The gun grabbers are in full force on PMSNBC this morning.

Something stinks about this Vegas story. Can’t figger it out yet, but something doesn’t add up


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Many of us thought this had to be bump stocks. A couple of things. Yes they can increase the rapidity of shooting, but the reality is that even with a bump stock he would have been unlikely to shoot 4-800 rounds per minute. For one he didn’t have anything that that could have fed that many bullets into the gun. Secondly I don’t think the guns he had could have handled the heat generated from 4-800 rounds a minute

The gun grabbers are in full force on PMSNBC this morning.

Something stinks about this Vegas story. Can’t figger it out yet, but something doesn’t add up


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

He would have had to have a really big magazine to fire 400 to 800 rpm.

He could have very well been using two rifles, one after the other.
 
I like it. It's legal. DEMOCRATS are triggered by it, so I like it even more.

DEMOCRATS who cry that it's wrong to blame Muslims for terrorism want to blame guns for murder.

DEMOCRATS try to give rights to illegal aliens but don't respect the rights o US citizens.

DEMOCRATS want to punish all Americans for the actions of a few, but they can't because we have rights.

DEMOCRATS who never demand that Muslim murderers be disarmed want to take away our rights.

DEMOCRATS who failed to prevent black-on-black murders want to take away our rights.

DEMOCRATS will never take away our rights.
 
Legal and lethal.

Why should all Americans be denied their Constitutional rights because of one criminal?

If it's wrong to punish all Muslims for the actions of a few, it's wrong to punish all US citizens for the actions of a few.

Liberals say drug laws don't work.

Liberals say the war on drugs is lost.

The same liberals want more gun laws that won't work.

The same liberals want a war on guns that cannot be won.
 
Legal and lethal.

Why should all Americans be denied their Constitutional rights because of one criminal?

If it's wrong to punish all Muslims for the actions of a few, it's wrong to punish all US citizens for the actions of a few.

Liberals say drug laws don't work.

Liberals say the war on drugs is lost.

The same liberals want more gun laws that won't work.

The same liberals want a war on guns that cannot be won.

Hopefully after this tragedy, this device will be outlawed now!
 
He would have had to have a really big magazine to fire 400 to 800 rpm.

He could have very well been using two rifles, one after the other.

True, which is probably more likely in this story. I just don’t want the gun grabbers to think this guy had the ability to shoot 4-800 rounds a minute.

The gun ignorance among lefties on this board is astounding to begin with, we should not add to it
 
he had like 20 guns ready fucksacks


he would shoot until too hot and pick up another



there is no need for these types of guns


you just like seeing dead Americans
 
This is how stupid some people are and especially those who write the "news":

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/breakingnews/las-vegas-gunman-used-bump-stock-device-to-speed-fire/ar-AAsQ32O?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp

"...The gunman who unleashed hundreds of rounds of gunfire on a crowd of concertgoers in Las Vegas had two "bump-stocks" that could have converted semi-automatic firearms into fully automatic ones..."

No, it doesn't.

You are correct. It doesn't convert. It's still semi auto as one pull of the trigger produces one shot. To convert it, the selector switch would have to be able to go to a position other than safe or fire.

It would be nice of those that wanted to talk badly about guns actually knew something about them other than they hated them.
 
Back
Top