Governor Race-Brown Aid Calls Whitman a Whore

C

Canceled2

Banned
California’s personal and unpleasant governor’s race just took another step toward the bottom as a tape emerged in which an aide to Democrat Jerry Brown calls Republican Meg Whitman a “whore” for her attempts to get endorsements from law enforcement.

Story here
 
Ice Dancer said:
California’s personal and unpleasant governor’s race just took another step toward the bottom as a tape emerged in which an aide to Democrat Jerry Brown calls Republican Meg Whitman a “whore” for her attempts to get endorsements from law enforcement.

Story here
Click to expand...

Heard that this morning on local news no less! Jerry Brown is digging deep in the $hit bag.
 
I don't care for the fact that she agreed not to include policeman in the public sector groups for pension reform in an attempt to win their endorsement.
 
cawacko said:
I don't care for the fact that she agreed not to include policeman in the public sector groups for pension reform in an attempt to win their endorsement.
Click to expand...

Kind of like Obama selling out to the unions on healthcare. There's always going to be some kind of quid pro quo, dude. Just the facts.

Jerry had his stab at California and he obliterated Oakland.

His campaign platform is weak: In a nutshell I read it like this:

At this point in my life (i.e. closer to death than anything) I am finally in a position to actually focus on the governorship of my state and not get too distracted by anything else because this will be my last job on this earth.
 
cawacko said:
I don't care for the fact that she agreed not to include policeman in the public sector groups for pension reform in an attempt to win their endorsement.
Click to expand...

I have not read that she agreed to do this? I read that Brown was suspicious that she might based on some of her comments...big difference. Her reasoning behind exempting public safety personell has more to do with their line of work, i.e. neccesary
 
Ice Dancer said:
I have not read that she agreed to do this? I read that Brown was suspicious that she might based on some of her comments...big difference. Her reasoning behind exempting public safety personell has more to do with their line of work, i.e. neccesary
Click to expand...

Or getting their endorsement.
 
Watermarx said:
Or getting their endorsement.
Click to expand...

Endoresments are nice, but they don't guarentee votes and they bind you to action...Sacramento can't afford to be bound to action except such action as will save their asses. Another view of why exempting only one sector could actually be damaging is that you risk really pissing off all the other sectors within PERS.

This was really about Brown's campaign projecting their own shit onto Whitman.
 
Last edited:
Update

The day after he (or a member of his staff) is caught on tape calling Meg Whitman a whore, Jerry Brown has announced the endorsement of the National Organization of Women (NOW).

You know, it's fashionable in feminist circles to sit around bemoaning the fact that few young women want to identify themselves as feminists.

Wanna know why? This kind of hypocrisy is the reason why. It's OK with NOW, supposedly an organization devoted to the equal and respectful treatment of women for Jerry Brown to call his opponent -- an accomplished woman, and more importantly, any woman -- a "whore." It's OK with NOW for Bill Clinton to engage in sexual harassment of an intern in The White House, and possibly worse in his pre-presidential days. It's OK with NOW to allow Sarah Palin to be denigrated in the cheapest, lowest and most sexist ways.

NOW has nothing to do with women's rights, or the proper treatment of women. They are simply shills for abortion and big government. They ought to admit it and take the word "Women" out of their name, because they no more stand for "women" in general than President Obama stands for small government and low taxes.

Women -- and men -- are on to NOW's racket. That's why their endorsement means nothing. They're just political hacks. What young woman in her right mind would want to be associated with such cheap political opportunism?
 
I've looked over some of your posts, and wonder why you object to anyone calling another person a 'whore'.

That seems mild compared to your usual 'debating' tactic.
 
Ohcapzag said:
I've looked over some of your posts, and wonder why you object to anyone calling another person a 'whore'.

That seems mild compared to your usual 'debating' tactic.
Click to expand...

Yes, it is mild in comparison to my posts which are responses to other trashy posts...kind of what happens 'round here. Of course I am not running for office on a ticket that is supposed to be representative of women and equal rights and such...I know just more leftist hypocrisy is all~
 
Ice Dancer said:
Yes, it is mild in comparison to my posts which are responses to other trashy posts...kind of what happens 'round here. Of course I am not running for office on a ticket that is supposed to be representative of women and equal rights and such...I know just more leftist hypocrisy is all~
Click to expand...

The "they did it too" defense?

You're a real class act.
 
Ohcapzag said:
The "they did it too" defense?

You're a real class act.
Click to expand...

Well since 'tween the two of us you lobbed the first name calling and I merely responded in kind I'd just call it tit for tat...but it does take a leftist hypocrite to neglect to see their own image in the mirror.
 
Ice Dancer said:
Well since 'tween the two of us you lobbed the first name calling and I merely responded in kind I'd just call it tit for tat...but it does take a leftist hypocrite to neglect to see their own image in the mirror.
Click to expand...

The "you did it first" defense?

Awesome.

I'll bet Jesus is smiling at you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top