GOP luvs BP

The Associated Press

Published: June 20, 2010

WASHINGTON - The White House is relishing what it sees as "a political gift" — GOP criticism of the administration for pushing BP for a $20 billion compensation fund — and warning of the danger if voters put big business-backing Republicans back in power.

With people angry over government spending and corporate bailouts, Democrats face the possibility of larger-than-usual losses in midterm elections and could lose control of the House or Senate — or both.

White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel seized on the words of a few Republicans in defense of BP to make a larger point about what a GOP-run Congress might do and what the government's proper role in regulating business should be.

"Do you think that BP is the aggrieved party here? Do you think that Wall Street should be left alone and not have any reforms?" Emanuel said. "Elections are about choices. Those are what is fundamental. There is a difference in our philosophies."

President Barack Obama will speak in the weeks ahead about "these competing, different philosophies," Emanuel told ABC's "This Week."

At a House hearing Thursday, Democrats and Republicans criticized BP's chief executive, Tony Hayward, for his company's actions before and after the Deepwater Horizon oil rig disaster in April.

But Texas Rep. Joe Barton, the top Republican on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, apologized for the way the White House had treated BP and said the $20 billion oil spill fund was the result of a "shakedown." Hours later, after criticism from both parties, Barton stepped back from those comments.

Barton has received $100,470 in campaign donations from oil and gas interests since the beginning of 2009, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The same group reported that since 1990, political action committees of the oil and gas industry and people who worked for it have given more than $1.4 million to Barton's campaigns, the most of any House member during that period.

Other Republicans have sounded sympathetic to BP in their criticism of the administration. Last month, Rand Paul, the Republican nominee for the Senate in Kentucky, said the administration's handling of the oil spill was antibusiness and that Obama at times sounded "really un-American in his criticism of business."

Emanuel said Barton and other Republicans see BP as the aggrieved party instead of the communities along the Gulf Coast.

"And that would the governing philosophy. And I think what Joe Barton did is remind the American people, in case they've forgotten, this is how the Republicans would govern," he said.

Emanuel added: "You can say it's a political gift for us, and it is. But it's dangerous for the American people, because while the ranking Republican would have oversight into the energy industry, and if the Republicans were the majority, would have actually the gavel and the chairmanship."

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, appearing on "Fox News Sunday," distanced himself from Barton's remarks and rejected Democratic claims that Republicans care more about oil companies than the environment.

"BP doesn't need an apology. They need to apologize to us, and they certainly need to cover all the costs of the cleanup and the economic damages as well. And they're going to," McConnell said.

Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., called Barton's statement "dumb" as well as baffling and said the congressman was speaking only for himself. "That is not mainstream Republican thought," Shelby told CBS' "Face the Nation."

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, said Emanuel's description of Republican Party's philosophy concerning business "couldn't be more wrong." While she said Barton's comments also were wrong as well as inappropriate, she questioned the White House effort to make an issue of them.

"Let's not forget — we had 11 people die. We have an environmental disaster unfolding. We have an economic disaster that is unfolding," Murkowski said on CNN's "State of the Union." She added: "Let's focus on providing what the people of the Gulf need, not pointing fingers back and forth and saying, 'Oh, you know, what you said was wrong."'

Ken Feinberg, the chief of the Independent Claims Facility, dismissed Barton's statement that the fund he will oversee was the result of a shakedown, saying that it doesn't help to politicize the program. Appearing on NBC's "Meet the Press," Feinberg said he was receiving advice from Democrats and Republicans alike and hoped the effort to compensate Gulf residents would continue to be bipartisan.

“Other members of the Republican leadership have come to the defense of BP and attacked the administration for forcing them to set up an escrow account and fund it to the level of $20 billion. These aren’t political gaffes. You know, I’ve been in hearings. Joe Barton was speaking from prepared remarks. Rand Paul, who is running Kentucky, a leading Senate candidate for the Republicans said BP, the way they were being treated was un-American.”

Just to make sure that everyone watching got it, Emanuel repeated his point that the Republican defense of BP echoes their philosophy, “That is an approach to — they think the government is the problem. And in this balance, and the difference here is that BP made a mess. And the government, and also in the president’s view, in certain areas like MMS, hasn’t done its job.”

Republicans had best get used to this, because they are going to be bludgeoned with their defense of BP from now until November. Emanuel was correct that their defense of BP echoes the GOP’s larger philosophy that corporate America is always right, and that government exists to aid corporate America’s quest for profits. If the GOP is opposed to holding BP accountable for the worst environmental disaster in US history, then what exactly would it take for Republicans to regulate anyone?




For the board copyright cops, who can't refute a single point so they attack the message on "legal: grounds:

http://www2.tbo.com/content/2010/jun/20/emanuel-gop-support-bp-political-gift/

http://www.politicususa.com/en/gop-bp-dangerous
 
what manner of folks will be running Congress if control flips to Republicans in the November election...Joe Barton is not alone in tossing bouquets and sympathy toward the corporation responsible for the worse pollution disaster in American history...BP "shouldn't have to be fleeced," in the words of Rep. Michelle Bachmann...who described as "a redistribution of wealth fund" the $20 billion escrow account set up to pay cleanup costs and claims..."We can't afford to demonize" BP, Sarah Palin declared...President Obama "is directly engaged in extorting money" from BP, ex-House Speaker...Newt Gingrich charged...when he was a law professor, Barack Obama taught his law students "how to use the Constitution to shake down corporations through race and grievance lawsuits," Rush Limbaugh charged..." The BP escrow account is an example of "Chicago-style shakedown politics" by President Obama, Rep. Tom Price, R-Georgia, chairman of the Republican Study Committee...Rand Paul delivered a now-famous "Accidents happen."








For the board Copyright Patrol, which consists of weak faggots who can't argue their case except by crying foul:

http://blog.buzzflash.com/dailybuzz/958
 
you dishonest hack...not only did i inform you of violating copyright rules by trying to pass off someone else's work as your own, i refuted your stupid points and you have yet to address any refutation....coward

secondly....

a few Republicans

lmao....now its the whole gop because of a few republicans

perhaps i should hold the dems responsible for everything a blue dog says
 
you dishonest hack...not only did i inform you of violating copyright rules by trying to pass off someone else's work as your own, i refuted your stupid points and you have yet to address any refutation....coward

secondly....



lmao....now its the whole gop because of a few republicans

perhaps i should hold the dems responsible for everything a blue dog says

Is hack your other pet name for people whose arguments you fear, pansy?

http://my.barackobama.com/page/cont...d-search_gop&gclid=COP1v4v6zKICFZdL5Qodixp2wg
 
You have not presented one, snitch.

Eleven Americans are dead due to the negligence of their employer BP (British Petroleum); the Gulf of Mexico is becoming a dead zone for sea life as giant plumes of oil pollute the water; fragile ecosystems along the Gulf Coast of the United States are being destroyed as oil washes up into marshlands and estuaries; Gulf Coast residents, many of whom for generations have made a living fishing in the Gulf, see their livelihood and way of life being destroyed as BP delays paying their economic losses resulting from BP's negligence; BP tried to pull a fast one on these same Gulf Coast residents by hiring them for clean-up jobs for a few thousand dollars, with a contract that contained a "waiver of claims" provision ("you're screwed, suckers!"); clean-up crews and wildlife rescue workers are becoming ill due to exposure to toxic substances and inadequate safety equipment; BP has been lying to the U.S. Coast Guard and government regulators for two months now about the size and scope of the leak, and what BP has the capacity to do to stop the leak; it is now the worst environmental disaster in U.S. history.

Despite this environmental disaster, Republican Governors Bobby Jindahl (LA) and Haley Barbour (MS) pleaded with the president not to suspend off-shore oil drilling. Louisiana in particular is a wholly owned subsidiary of the petro-chemical industry. These Gulf Coast governors still want "drill, baby, drill" at the same time they demand federal disaster funds and government assistance. They talk big about the so-called GOP values of self-reliance, smaller government, and reducing the federal debt. But Southern Republicans are always the first with their hands out for government money and assistance every time there is a flood, tornado, hurricane, or man-made disaster of their own making (ask Gov. Jindahl about what environmental regulations Louisiana imposes on the petro-chemical industry. "What environmental regulations?" is the correct answer.)







For the copyright tattletales who have no adequate rebuttal to the points in this article:

http://www.blogforarizona.com/blog/...es-with-big-oil-over-the-american-people.html
 
Back
Top