Globalists destroy societies

Bai Lan

Bai Lan

Let It Rot
Think like an immoral greedy globalist.

Globalist try to make it so no society can function without the multinational corporations they control.

How do they keep societies dependant? overspecialization and comparative advantage poppycock.

Harmony results when a nation is about equally manufacturing and consumption. It can produce what it needs, and the people can buy it.

To stay in control they try to fashion overspecialized societies which are basically non functional without their mirror image society overseas.

China is geared up as a producer, we're geared up as a consumer, both paradigms are non functional without the other. In this way they create a dependancy with themselves in the middle, holding all the cards.

Reject globalist zealotry. Say no to internationalist fascism.
 
so you want no corporations or just national corporations? you don't want mcdonalds to serve anyone but americans? have you ever been to canada?
 
Yurt said:
so you want no corporations or just national corporations? you don't want mcdonalds to serve anyone but americans? have you ever been to canada?
Click to expand...

I want a sensible and coherent trade balance. WIllingness to destroy the middle class is not a legitimate comparative advantage.
 
Threedee said:
People who rise to the top put themselves through intense hardship to get there. Just ask Hank Rearden (sorry, I just read a little more from Atlas Shrugged)!
Click to expand...

Not really. Sometimes they just outsource all americans and get rewarded for their treachery.
 
AssHatZombie said:
Not really. Sometimes they just outsource all americans and get rewarded for their treachery.
Click to expand...

Well, that's how they make their sweet bonues, and add special options to their portfolios. But what they have to do to make it into the executive ranks actually requires a great deal of personal sacrifice and hardship. Obviously they aren't learning enough from their trials, and come out believing that they are entitled to screw other people over...
 
Threedee said:
Well, that's how they make their sweet bonues, and add special options to their portfolios. But what they have to do to make it into the executive ranks actually requires a great deal of personal sacrifice and hardship. Obviously they aren't learning enough from their trials, and come out believing that they are entitled to screw other people over...
Click to expand...

Bullshit. Get your lips off executive cock.
 
Threedee said:
I'm too lazy to get anywhere near it. Not willing to sacrifice, and don't have the skills to get an educational degree in a relevant field to go into big business anyhoo...
Click to expand...

But this is a canard anyway. Your "no pain no gain" idiocy was presented as a defense of globalization and destroying the middle class, not descriptive of a career of a single executive.

Sorry you're a loser.
 
AssHatZombie said:
But this is a canard anyway. Your "no pain no gain" idiocy was presented as a defense of globalization and destroying the middle class, not descriptive of a career of a single executive.

Sorry you're a loser.
Click to expand...

Either way, you don't take risks, you don't get anywhere.

When Hamilton presented his Reports on Public Credit and Report on Manufactures, his call to industrialize and expand America's commercial system could be viewed as a great risk at the time. Much of it was rejected (particularly, the crucial Report on Manufactures), and it hurt America in the long run, because we could not expand our economy as quickly, as smoothly, or as painlessly, as ultimately played out.
 
Threedee said:
Either way, you don't take risks, you don't get anywhere.

When Hamilton presented his Reports on Public Credit and Report on Manufactures, his call to industrialize and expand America's commercial system could be viewed as a great risk at the time. Much of it was rejected (particularly, the crucial Report on Manufactures), and it hurt America in the long run, because we could not expand our economy as quickly, as smoothly, or as painlessly, as ultimately played out.
Click to expand...

This is totally irrelevant. And anyway, it's easy to take risks when you get to keep the profits, but losses get put on the taxpayer. I won't be worshipping "business people" anytime soon. I used to be as stupid as you.
 
AssHatZombie said:
This is totally irrelevant. And anyway, it's easy to take risks when you get to keep the profits, but losses get put on the taxpayer. I won't be worshipping "business people" anytime soon. I used to be as stupid as you.
Click to expand...

Tell the government to stop giving money away, then. Seriously, the reason why these bailouts occur, is that Americans tend to separate themselves out from the business and financial sector, as if they have no connection to it, "cuz they'z poor folk," and make really shitty policy, generally because unscrupulous ideologues are feeding them class warfare lines.

Then the business and financial sectors start to fail, and people suddenly realize that, shit! these are our employers, as well as the people managing our pensions, medical, portfolios, livlihood, and if they die, so do we. So they bail the fuckers out. Now, whose fault is that?

There have been some extenuating circumstances. The Big 3 automakers have been among the worst business decision-makers over the last 30 years, all on their own. Public policy, and shitty union contracts do not come close to what the execs did, and/or failed to do.
 
AssHatZombie said:
Think like an immoral greedy globalist.

Globalist try to make it so no society can function without the multinational corporations they control.

How do they keep societies dependant? overspecialization and comparative advantage poppycock.

Harmony results when a nation is about equally manufacturing and consumption. It can produce what it needs, and the people can buy it.

To stay in control they try to fashion overspecialized societies which are basically non functional without their mirror image society overseas.

China is geared up as a producer, we're geared up as a consumer, both paradigms are non functional without the other. In this way they create a dependancy with themselves in the middle, holding all the cards.

Reject globalist zealotry. Say no to internationalist fascism.
Click to expand...

You have to expand your mind, Asshat. Your view is far too narrow.

You talk about a nation being equally manufacturing and consumption. Think "world" instead of "nation". We are one planet.

Imagine if Vermonters decided not to buy corn from Iowa and those folks in Iowa decided not to buy maple syrup from Vermont. That is what you are proposing on a world scale. Should Vermonters grow their own corn?

Globalization is coming. Don't fight it.
 
apple0154 said:
You have to expand your mind, Asshat. Your view is far too narrow.
Click to expand...
No. You've been brainwashed to believe globalization is unconditionally good.
You talk about a nation being equally manufacturing and consumption. Think "world" instead of "nation". We are one planet.
Click to expand...
We are all individuals.
Imagine if Vermonters decided not to buy corn from Iowa and those folks in Iowa decided not to buy maple syrup from Vermont. That is what you are proposing on a world scale. Should Vermonters grow their own corn?

Globalization is coming. Don't fight it.
Click to expand...

People should never let their capacity to grow feed be taken from them. It's too stupid.

Internationalist Fascism will ultimately fail; it's too evil not to.
 
AssHatZombie said:
You can't imagine what a balanced trade policy looks like? How limited you must be.

A mind is a terrible thing to waste.
Click to expand...

no you backwards inbred fascist cockloaf, how do you make it work, what does that look like? what is balanced trade? all trade is exactly equal....what is equal, the money, the labor, what....
 
apple0154 said:
You have to expand your mind, Asshat. Your view is far too narrow.
Click to expand...
enlightenment of that magnitude just makes you an airhead.

apple0154 said:
You talk about a nation being equally manufacturing and consumption. Think "world" instead of "nation". We are one planet.
Click to expand...
right. Ahmedinijad is inviting asshat and myself over for some beer next week.

apple0154 said:
Imagine if Vermonters decided not to buy corn from Iowa and those folks in Iowa decided not to buy maple syrup from Vermont. That is what you are proposing on a world scale. Should Vermonters grow their own corn?
Click to expand...
the feds outlawed that in 1934.

apple0154 said:
Globalization is coming. Don't fight it.
Click to expand...

I secede from the world. STYville is a whole new world now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top