Given the past year, imagine the number the right wing innuendo machine

A

archives

Verified User
could do with the presumptive events surrounding the Trump candidacy; Trump questions US involvement in NATO, Trump displays admiration for Putin, Trump justifies Russian aggression in the Ukraine, Trump talks of lessening sanctions against Russia, Trump releases campaign manager Manafort over questioning of his relationship with Putin, the Democrats and only the Democrats are hacked by an outside source, 17 intelligence agencies conclude Russia is behind hacking of Democrats, the CIA determines that Russia did directly interfere in the US election in favor of the Trump candidacy

The got a year out of innuendos over Clinton's private server, even got the Federal Gov't to foot the bill for millions with "investigations" that proved absolutely nothing, so imagine the field day the conservatives could have had with the facts relating to Trump's bromance with Russia? Their demogogues would have raked in millions for years, and they wouldn't have had to even rely on fake news
 
cawacko said:
What do you actually support archives? Anything?
Click to expand...

What do I support? I point out the hypocrisy on the right and you ask "what do I support?" Well, I don't support hypocrisy, how's that for a starter?

Give me an issue and I'll tell you where I fall
 
archives said:
could do with the presumptive events surrounding the Trump candidacy; Trump questions US involvement in NATO, Trump displays admiration for Putin, Trump justifies Russian aggression in the Ukraine, Trump talks of lessening sanctions against Russia, Trump releases campaign manager Manafort over questioning of his relationship with Putin, the Democrats and only the Democrats are hacked by an outside source, 17 intelligence agencies conclude Russia is behind hacking of Democrats, the CIA determines that Russia did directly interfere in the US election in favor of the Trump candidacy

The got a year out of innuendos over Clinton's private server, even got the Federal Gov't to foot the bill for millions with "investigations" that proved absolutely nothing, so imagine the field day the conservatives could have had with the facts relating to Trump's bromance with Russia? Their demogogues would have raked in millions for years, and they wouldn't have had to even rely on fake news
Click to expand...

innuendos over Clinton's private server, ?... Comey's testimony wasn't innuendo...it was direct evidence,....proof about Clinton's mishandling of classified material....
 
NOVA said:
innuendos over Clinton's private server, ?... Comey's testimony wasn't innuendo...it was direct evidence,....proof about Clinton's mishandling of classified material....
Click to expand...

Which he also concluded was so inconsequential that no prosecutor would ever take it to Court
 
archives said:
What do I support? I point out the hypocrisy on the right and you ask "what do I support?" Well, I don't support hypocrisy, how's that for a starter?

Give me an issue and I'll tell you where I fall
Click to expand...

It's pretty easy to point out someone else's hypocrisy when you don't stand for anything
 
archives said:
could do with the presumptive events surrounding the Trump candidacy; Trump questions US involvement in NATO, Trump displays admiration for Putin, Trump justifies Russian aggression in the Ukraine, Trump talks of lessening sanctions against Russia, Trump releases campaign manager Manafort over questioning of his relationship with Putin, the Democrats and only the Democrats are hacked by an outside source, 17 intelligence agencies conclude Russia is behind hacking of Democrats, the CIA determines that Russia did directly interfere in the US election in favor of the Trump candidacy

The got a year out of innuendos over Clinton's private server, even got the Federal Gov't to foot the bill for millions with "investigations" that proved absolutely nothing, so imagine the field day the conservatives could have had with the facts relating to Trump's bromance with Russia? Their demogogues would have raked in millions for years, and they wouldn't have had to even rely on fake news
Click to expand...

You're the village idiot, aren't you?
 
archives said:
Which he also concluded was so inconsequential that no prosecutor would ever take it to Court
Click to expand...

cite that?....I never heard him say her actions were inconsequential.....what I heard him say was that her actions (crimes, to me) were not intentional.
She didn't intend to break the law ?....Thats bullshit to me, too.....I tried that line with some traffic cops and it never worked....
 
NOVA said:
cite that?....I never heard him say her actions were inconsequential.....what I heard him say was that her actions (crimes, to me) were not intentional.
She didn't intend to break the law ?....Thats bullshit to me, too.....I tried that line with some traffic cops and it never worked....
Click to expand...

Didn't author he said it, rather he concluded such, obvious reason he said no prosecutor would ever take the case to Court,

And what "you think" are crimes don't make them crimes, nothing anywhere,after millions of dollars wasted, was ever proven on any of the accusations leveled against Clinton other than what individuals as yourself "think" they are, and thats the facts
 
Guille said:
I have a lot to offer, I just didn't see any reason to waste it on the likes of you.
Click to expand...

I see, you'd rather spend it concurring with someone who you agree with, I understand, different points of view challenge the way you envision the world, much easier being a lemming
 
archives said:
I see, you'd rather spend it concurring with someone who you agree with, I understand, different points of view challenge the way you envision the world, much easier being a lemming
Click to expand...

You spit out talking points from MSNBC and accuse others of lemminghood. Are you starting to see why I didn't waste my time?
 
Guille said:
You spit out talking points from MSNBC and accuse others of lemminghood. Are you starting to see why I didn't waste my time?
Click to expand...

Wrong again, but now that your into the media martyr line it kinda shows your running out of content quickly
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top