Ga voters sue to overturn special election

evince

evince

Truthmatters
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/g...as-6th-congressional-district/article/2627744



A group of Georgia voters and a Colorado-based watchdog organization filed a lawsuit late Monday asking a judge to overturn the results of last month's 6th Congressional District special election and scrap the state's voting system, Colorado Politics has learned.
The complaint, filed in Fulton County Superior Court, alleges that state and local election officials ignored warnings for months that Georgia's centralized election system — already known for potential security flaws and lacking a paper trail to verify results — had been compromised and left unprotected from intruders since at least last summer, casting doubt on Republican Karen Handel's 3.8-point win over Democrat Jon Ossoff in the most expensive House race in the nation's history.
 
becuase being cheated is not losing


cheati g is not winnig


didnt your parents teach you that?


being robbed is not a crime


ROBBING is a crime
 
evince said:
becuase being cheated is not losing


cheati g is not winnig


didnt your parents teach you that?


being robbed is not a crime


ROBBING is a crime
Click to expand...

Losing doesn't mean you were cheated. That's the automatic left wing whiner claim. You lost. Get over it. No one wants your ideas.

Didn't your parents teach you that? Guess not. They didn't teach you anything to speak of. When your whore mother told you to be good at something she didn't expect nothing to be the thing you were good at.
 
evince said:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/g...as-6th-congressional-district/article/2627744

A group of Georgia voters and a Colorado-based watchdog organization filed a lawsuit late Monday asking a judge to overturn the results of last month's 6th Congressional District special election and scrap the state's voting system, Colorado Politics has learned.
The complaint, filed in Fulton County Superior Court, alleges that state and local election officials ignored warnings for months that Georgia's centralized election system — already known for potential security flaws and lacking a paper trail to verify results — had been compromised and left unprotected from intruders since at least last summer, casting doubt on Republican Karen Handel's 3.8-point win over Democrat Jon Ossoff in the most expensive House race in the nation's history.
Click to expand...

Correction; a group of whiny dimwitted liberal aswhipes are trying to undo an election much like the whiny dimwitted liberal asswhipes think they can do with Trump.

America will grow weary of whiny dimwitted liberal asswhipes and in the end, marginalize them from political power. Sooner, hopefully, than later.
 
The Georgia lawsuit isn't alleging the election system has been hacked, but computer security experts argue that the state's voting equipment and computers have been at risk of intrusion for so long that election officials must assume they've been compromised.

@_@
 
Critics, however, contend the judge concluded nothing of the sort, ruling only that the plaintiffs hadn't demonstrated the machines "had widely malfunctioned or skewed results." A sophisticated hacker, computer security experts say, could erase tracks, requiring an equally sophisticated investigation to uncover evidence of an intrusion. That's why, plaintiffs told Colorado Politics, they're also asking the court to order a forensic analysis of the state's voting system and its components.
Polling places in Georgia use Diebold AccuVote TS touchscreen voting machines first purchased in 2002 and run on a modified version of Windows last updated by Microsoft 14 years ago, King told the Brennan Center for Justice two years ago as part of a study on voting security. (The company changed its name to Premier Election Solutions about a decade ago, and most of its assets were later purchased by Dominion Voting Systems.) The election center King operates at Kennesaw State has been responsible for overseeing and securing the state's electronic election equipment and infrastructure since the state installed the system.
"It's quite clear that the center at Kennesaw State has very lax security procedures," said Barbara Simons, chairwoman of the nonpartisan Verified Voting advocacy organization. "But even if they have perfect security, those machines should not be used. They're paperless machines — you cannot check the results, and the voter cannot verify that the voter's selections has been accurately recorded inside the machine's memory."
Although the nonprofit isn't involved in the Georgia litigation, it has been working nationwide to eliminate paperless voting. Every single study of the machines Georgia uses, she added, "has shown them to be insecure. Georgia should have stopped using these machines a long time ago."
California ditched the system Georgia uses a decade ago after a software bug caused a machine to erase more than 100 votes, and Maryland switched from the system to paper ballots at about the same time over concerns about security, glitches and the ability to conduct a recount
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diebold_Nixdorf#International_growth_.281998-2001.29


International growth (1998-2001)[edit]
In the 1990s the company significantly diversified its products, and by 1998 was offering "automated teller machines, electronic and physical security equipment, automated medication dispensing systems, software, supplies and integrated systems solutions."[6] Under Diebold chairman and CEO Robert Mahoney,[23] Diebold debuted an ATM in 1999 that identified customers using iris recognition,[7] which was the first of its kind.[7][24] Also that year, Diebold introduced the first talking ATM in the United States.[25] In October 1999, Diebold acquired all the stock of Procomp Amazonia Industria Electronica, S.A, a manufacturer of retail and banking automation equipment such as ATMs based in Sao Paulo, Brazil.[23]
The U.S. National Archives in Washington, D.C. hired Diebold in 2001 to secure documents such as the Charters of Freedom, The Constitution, The Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence.[7] In February 2002, Diebold announced it would acquire the financial self-service assets of the European companies Getronics NV and Groupe Bull for approximately USD $160 million.[26] The agreement put Diebold near "$2 billion in revenue on an annualized basis."[26] By the end of 2002, Diebold had 13,000 associates and serviced 88 countries. The company also continued to secure historical items such as the Hope Diamond at the Smithsonian Institution.[24] Seeking to expand in India,[27] at the end of 2002, Diebold announced a new production unit in Goa manufacturing ATMs in collaboration with Tata Infotec, and soon after announced a new corporate office in Mumbai.[27] Revenue in 2003 was $2.1 billion for Diebold overall, with stock up 36% for the year.[28]
 
if you say this election was hacked because you feel it was then every other election was hacked too.
 
Diebold Election Systems and UTC (2002-2009)[edit]
See also: Premier Election Solutions
In 2002, Diebold entered the United States elections industry through the acquisition of Global Election Systems, a producer of touch-screen voting technology based in McKinney, Texas. Branded Diebold Election Systems (DES), the acquisition was their smallest business segment,[29] and in late 2002, 3.7 million voters in Georgia used DES touch-screen stations.[24] DES was soon the subject of controversy amid allegations surrounding the security and reliability of some of its products,[30] as well as the political fundraising activities of Diebold’s then-CEO Walden O'Dell in 2003. Critics argued O'Dell had a political conflict of interest which could compromise the security of Diebold's ballots,[28] which O'Dell denied.[31] Shortly afterwards, Diebold forbade its top executives from making political donations.[32] Citing personal reasons,[33] O'Dell resigned in December 2005[34] after several consecutive quarters of poor performance,[33] with his role taken by Tom Swidarski.[35] In August 2007, DES rebranded itself as Premier Election Solutions,[36][37][29] and two years later the division was sold to a competitor, Election Systems & Software.[38]
Wired Magazine reported in 2007 that an editor using a Diebold IP address had removed negative information from the Diebold Wikipedia page, with the information later moved to a more appropriate location.[39] Diebold was increasingly focusing on technology related to mobile banking as of 2008,[40] incorporating mobile banking into many of its products. That year Diebold was selected to be the sole ATM provider at certain Beijing Olympics venues.[7] In March 2008, United Technologies Corporation (UTC), a large engineering and defense conglomerate, announced it had made a $2.63 billion bid to buy Diebold, which was later rejected as too low.[5] In October 2008, UTC announced it was breaking off acquisition talks after Diebold rejected the offer.[41] The company had 17,000 workers worldwide by April 2009.[14] In 2009 Bank Technology News ranked Diebold as No. 1 on its FINTECH 100 list of ATM providers.[7]
 
Flushing $25 million down the toilet in a losing effort was nothing like the billion-plus Hillary burned for nothing.
 
evince said:
becuase being cheated is not losing


cheati g is not winnig


didnt your parents teach you that?


being robbed is not a crime


ROBBING is a crime
Click to expand...

Redneck garbage like CFM's parents don't teach their kids moral values.

They only teach them greed and how to get what you want by whatever means possible.
 
In early 2003, activists found a version of Diebold's secret software on the Internet. The code had so many security flaws that one group would later post a video of a chimpanzee changing votes.
Weeks later, Diebold's then-CEO Walden O'Dell famously wrote to fellow Bush supporters in a fundraising letter that he was committed to "help Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the President." It didn't take long for political activists, many of them already suspicious of the new voting technology, to begin diving through the company's dumpsters and picketing its shareholder meetings.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top