Foreign Policy Magazine Endorses Clinton

Mott the Hoople

Mott the Hoople

Sweet Jane
Not only has no major news paper endorsed Trump but Foreign Policy magazine, who are renowned for their objectivity and nonpartisanship analysis and study of Foreign Policy and who has never before endorsed a major party candidate till now.

Their endorsement though is essentially one by default. They lucidly and objectively spell out why Donald Trump is the single worst candidate for POTUS ever nominated by a major party in U.S. History.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/10/0...y-clinton-for-president-of-the-united-states/
 
pure trash:
~~~~~~

Fortunately, not only is Trump opposed by a worthy candidate, but his opponent is, on foreign-policy and national security issues — all of the areas we cover here at FP — one of the best qualified candidates this country has produced since World War II. As first lady, New York senator, and secretary of state, Hillary Clinton regularly distinguished herself by her intelligence, dogged work ethic, ability to work across the political aisle, and leadership on difficult issues. She has devoted her entire life to public service and has been a powerful and effective advocate for women, children, and those in need at home and abroad. Whether you agree with all the policy stances of her campaign or not, impartial eyes will conclude that her proposals on climate change, combating terrorism, and human rights are thoughtful and comprehensive — and ultimately worthy of consideration.

Hillary Clinton is a quality candidate who is unquestionably well-prepared to lead this country. What is more, we do not think it is a small thing that by her election she will be righting a deep wrong that has compromised U.S. democracy since its inception: the exclusion of women from its highest offices.

++

It's Democratic party type statement..i wonder who the editors are? It even goes into "first woman" as righing a wrong.
This is nothing but blather from a mag that should understand Libya/Syria and her vote on Iraq.

Must be a bunch of interventionists, with Democratic ties
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Not only has no major news paper endorsed Trump but Foreign Policy magazine, who are renowned for their objectivity and nonpartisanship analysis and study of Foreign Policy and who has never before endorsed a major party candidate till now.

Their endorsement though is essentially one by default. They lucidly and objectively spell out why Donald Trump is the single worst candidate for POTUS ever nominated by a major party in U.S. History.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/10/0...y-clinton-for-president-of-the-united-states/
Click to expand...

Give me strength! It may well have been objective once but it is now owned by the Washington Post since 2008. That to my mind should tell you all you need to know.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Not only has no major news paper endorsed Trump but Foreign Policy magazine, who are renowned for their objectivity and nonpartisanship analysis and study of Foreign Policy and who has never before endorsed a major party candidate till now.

Their endorsement though is essentially one by default. They lucidly and objectively spell out why Donald Trump is the single worst candidate for POTUS ever nominated by a major party in U.S. History.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/10/0...y-clinton-for-president-of-the-united-states/
Click to expand...

Yes the establishment endorsing the establishment gives you a tingle
 
Big deal, trumpf got endorsed by the
trump29n-2-web.jpg
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Not only has no major news paper endorsed Trump but Foreign Policy magazine, who are renowned for their objectivity and nonpartisanship analysis and study of Foreign Policy and who has never before endorsed a major party candidate till now.

Their endorsement though is essentially one by default. They lucidly and objectively spell out why Donald Trump is the single worst candidate for POTUS ever nominated by a major party in U.S. History.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/10/0...y-clinton-for-president-of-the-united-states/
Click to expand...

renowned for their objectivity and nonpartisanship ???????????? Your opinion ?

Proof once again that just about the entire media is in the tank for Hillary.....
 
Milagro said:
Give me strength! It may well have been objective once but it is now owned by the Washington Post since 2008. That to my mind should tell you all you need to know.
Click to expand...
Is it really?...no wonder that editorial was full of ...beans..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top