SmarterthanYou
rebel
Whole towns would have disappeared without the bailout.
You guys are so clueless.
we call it evolution. seriously, it's the only REAL way for business to learn from mistakes. all the bailout did is ensure future failures.
Whole towns would have disappeared without the bailout.
You guys are so clueless.
we call it evolution. seriously, it's the only REAL way for business to learn from mistakes. all the bailout did is ensure future failures.
Meanwhile, a few million people are still employed rather than on unemployment and/or assistance.
temporarily. All the bailout did was extend the time a crash happens. it's inevitable and will just take longer to recover from.
temporarily. All the bailout did was extend the time a crash happens. it's inevitable and will just take longer to recover from.
Awe, poor baby needs his safe place.Until then, feel free to shut the fuck up.
and that CEO has Obama to thank for his job
he helped nearly crash the business
you mean like Detroit and Flint did?.....Whole towns would have disappeared without the bailout.
You guys are so clueless.
did you forget Ford didn't receive any funds in the bailout?.....
Ford got a $9 billion line of credit and a $6 loan for hybrids. They also benefitted from the entire industry not collapsing.
https://www.thebalance.com/auto-industry-bailout-gm-ford-chrysler-3305670
Meanwhile, a few million people are still employed rather than on unemployment and/or assistance.
They still owe the Feds $3.5 billion in loans. Where do you think they got the money? The local pawn shop?
that doesn't change the fact that they didn't take any bailout money, which your link confirms.....taxpayers lost $8 billion on the bailout of GM, $1 billion on the bailout of Chrysler and lost nothing on Ford.....(from YOUR link).....
jobs were lost at the time......
loans are not gifts......they borrowed money from banks with federal guarantees.......the loans are not due until 2022....are you angry they haven't paid the banks early?.....
1.5 million jobs saved. How can you be so chronically wrong?
"The federal bailout of General Motors Co, Chrysler and parts suppliers in 2009 saved 1.5 million U.S. jobs and preserved $105.3 billion in personal and social insurance tax collections, according to a study released on Monday."
https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSL1N0JO0XU20131209
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_the_2008%E2%80%9310_automotive_industry_crisis_on_the_United_StatesOn February 18, 2009, General Motors and Chrysler again approached the U.S. government, in regard to obtaining a second bridging loan of $21.6 billion (£15.2 billion). $16.6 billion of this would go to General Motors, while Chrysler would take $5 billion. General Motors agreed to shed 47,000 jobs, close five plants, and axe 12 car models. Chrysler agreed to cut 3,000 jobs, cut one shift from production, and axe three car models.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-07-19/u-s-automakers-thrive-as-detroit-goes-bankruptDetroit’s ties to the fortunes of the auto industry have been fraying for six decades, as manufacturing jobs in the city fell from about 296,000 in 1950 to fewer than 27,000 in 2011.
The bailouts were gifts? Then why were GM and Chrysler paying those "gifts" back?
But, as the typical ignoramus you are, you dance around the answer to the question because it makes you look the dullard that you are. Let's try again. Where did Ford get that $5.9 billion?