Fl voter laws tossed by judge

evince

Truthmatters
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/...election-/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS




A federal judge on Thursday struck down portions of Florida’s new election law, siding with liberal groups opposed to the restrictions on drop boxes for mail-in ballots and third-party voter registration.

U.S. District Judge Mark Walker declared most of the law unconstitutional. He wrote that voting rights in the U.S. are “under siege” because of racial gerrymandering of congressional districts.
 
under the constitution, federal courts don't get to set voting laws........state legislators do.......the judge's decision will be thrown out on appeal......
 
They are unconstitutional idiot

no....they are not.....the judge's decision is in error.....

for example, saying that drop boxes are "more likely to be used by blacks" is a presumption not based upon fact.......you cannot say something is unconstitutional based upon an arbitrary standard.......
 
U.S. District Judge Mark Walker declared most of the law unconstitutional. He wrote that voting rights in the U.S. are “under siege” because of racial gerrymandering of congressional districts.

In his ruling, which will be appealed before a more conservative federal court, Judge Walker took the unusual step of imposing a 10-year ban on any changes to Florida’s election law without “pre-clearance” from the court.
 
Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, said the law significantly strengthened voter integrity in Florida. He said he anticipated Judge Walker would side with the left-leaning groups trying to block the law based on the court’s prior decisions.

“This is a judicial equivalent of pounding the table, and I think it was performative partisanship,” Mr. DeSantis said at a press conference. “I think that that’s going to be reversed on appeal. The only question is how quickly it gets reversed on appeal, but it’s not going to be able to withstand scrutiny.”
 
Edit

Hand v. Scott Edit
In January 2018, Walker ruled against Florida and ordered Governor Rick Scott to restore the voting rights of felons after their release from prison.[6]

League of Women Voters v. Detzner Edit
In July 2018, Walker invalidated as unconstitutional Florida's total prohibition on early voting sites on college and university campuses.[7] Walker determined the prohibition violated the First, Fourteenth, and Twenty-Sixth Amendments and the law revealed a "stark pattern of discrimination" against younger voters. Consequently, in the 2018 midterms, nearly 60,000 people voted at the on-campus early voting locations.[8]

Keohane v. Jones , et al. Edit
Walker ordered the Florida Department of Corrections to continue providing a transgender woman prisoner with hormone treatment and ordered them to provide her with women's undergarments and grooming products.[9] The prisoner was diagnosed with gender dysphoria but has been housed in a male-only correctional facility. The case is currently on appeal.

Madera-Rivera v. Detzner Edit
In September 2018, Walker decided another significant voting rights case, in which he granted a preliminary injunction against Florida's Secretary of State, directing him to ensure that Spanish speaking voters have access to ballots in the Spanish language for the November 2018 elections.[10] This decision, made on the basis of Section 4(e) of the Voting Rights Act, was especially critical, as Florida was grappling with a recent influx of Puerto Ricans fleeing the aftermath of 2017's Hurricane Maria.

League of Women Voters v. Scott Edit
After the 2018 midterms, Judge Walker ruled in favor of then-Governor Rick Scott who oversaw the state's ongoing recount in which he was a candidate for U.S. Senate. “Though sometimes careening perilously close to a due process violation, Scott’s most questionable conduct has occurred in his capacity as a candidate rather than as governor," Walker wrote. Though Scott's actions were “reckless and haphazard“ and “Scott has toed the line between imprudent campaign-trail rhetoric and problematic state action. But he has not crossed that line."[11]

Anti-protest law Edit
On September 9, 2021, Walker blocked Florida's anti-riot law as violation of the 1st amendment. [12]

University of Florida professors Edit
In another free speech case, on January 4, 2022, Walker refused to dismiss a lawsuit filed by professors at the University of Florida after the University tried to stop them from testifying in a voting rights lawsuit. [13]

League of Women Voters v. Laurel M. Lee Edit
On March 30, 2022, Walker ruled that Florida Senate Bill 90 violated the Voting Rights Act, issued a permanent injunction against the law’s restrictions on absentee ballot drop boxes, and required Florida to obtain preclearance from federal courts before enacting election laws.[14][15][16]

In an outline of the legislative history of the bill, Walker wrote, "And the exact justification for SB 90 as a whole, and for its constituent parts, is difficult to pin down, with sponsors and supporters offering conflicting or nonsensical rationales."[17]
 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_DeSantis


He worked for the commander of Joint Task Force-Guantanamo (JTF-GTMO), working directly with detainees at the Guantanamo Bay Joint Detention Facility.[17][18][19]

In 2007, DeSantis reported to the Naval Special Warfare Command Group in Coronado, California, where he was assigned to SEAL Team One and deployed to Iraq[20] with the troop surge as the Legal Advisor to the SEAL Commander, Special Operations Task Force-West in Fallujah.[17][18][19]




This guy is evil


A lawyer in Guantanamo: we tortured people ….. that’s against the laws





And



He was a lawyer to the top guy in Fallujah: we used white phosphorous illegally on civilians there (melted babies) it was illegal



He’s a fucking monster
 
Last edited:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallujah,_The_Hidden_Massacre



Fallujah, The Hidden Massacre is a documentary film by Sigfrido Ranucci and Maurizio Torrealta which first aired on Italy's RAI state television network on November 8, 2005. The film documents the use of weapons that the documentary asserts are chemical weapons, particularly the use of incendiary bombs, and alleges indiscriminate use of violence against civilians and children by military forces of the United States of America in the city of Fallujah in Iraq during the Fallujah Offensive of November 2004.
 
He came in as a lawyer after The use took place



He then helped lie about what happened for years until the USA admitted the use
 
Study: Fallujah's health fallout 'worse' than Hiroshima, Nagasaki

Stephen C. WebsterJuly 24, 2010

'Mutagenic and carcinogenic agents' blamed for soaring infant mortality, cancers

In Fallujah, a city just 50 miles from Baghdad, life has never been the same since April 2004, when U.S. Marines declared the entire area a free-fire zone and proceeded to do what Marines do best. Packing the most destructive weaponry in the world, American soldiers laid siege to the city, deploying depleted uranium munitions, white phosphorus and tons of conventional ballistics.

Operation Vigilant Resolve went on for a full month. Though U.S. forces allowed an estimated 70,000 women, children and elderly leave the city, to this day the campaign to recapture Fallujah is beset with allegations of war crimes.

In the wake of America's "shock and awe" bombing campaign to take Baghdad, radiation detectors as far away as the United Kingdom noticed a fourfold spike in radioactivity in the atmosphere. At the time, the Department of Defense bragged that the substance, a nuclear byproduct with a fraction of the radioactivity as standard uranium, is commonly ingested by Americans, in food, drinking water and the air, allegedly with no ill effects. Officials went on to say its use would cause "no impact on the health of people and the environment."

Today, according to a study by the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health [PDF link], rates of cancer, leukemia, infant mortality and sexual mutations in Fallujah are higher than those reported in the aftermath of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear detonations.
 
no....they are not.....the judge's decision is in error.....

for example, saying that drop boxes are "more likely to be used by blacks" is a presumption not based upon fact.......you cannot say something is unconstitutional based upon an arbitrary standard.......

Did you check to see if the court took evidence on who is more likely to use drop boxes? Or are you just talking out of your ass?
 
U.S. District Judge Mark Walker declared most of the law unconstitutional. He wrote that voting rights in the U.S. are “under siege” because of racial gerrymandering of congressional districts.

In his ruling, which will be appealed before a more conservative federal court, Judge Walker took the unusual step of imposing a 10-year ban on any changes to Florida’s election law without “pre-clearance” from the court.

I don't think he declared the law unconstitutional. He said it violated US laws on voting rights.
 
Back
Top