Financial bulls turn to Wells Fargo

The Dude

Banned
Financial bulls turn to Wells Fargo
By David Russell (david.russell@optionmonster.com)

Bank of America led the way, and now Wells Fargo is following.

BAC was the first major financial to light up optionMONSTER's Heat Seeker scanning program and was hugely profitable in the short term. WFC's activity took a much longer time horizon.

This time the Heat Seeker showed the purchase of about 19,500 January 2016 45 calls for $4.20. The trader sold a similar number of January 2015 40 calls for $5.70 seconds later, but that volume was below previous open interest. This suggests that an existing position was rolled out in time and up in strike.

Long calls lock in the price where a stock can be purchased, letting investors cheaply position for upside. In the case of yesterday's trade, he or she collected $1.50 by making the adjustment and now has an additional year to ride the shares higher. (See our Education section for more on how options can be used to manage trades more effectively.)

WFC rose 1.05 percent to $44.08 yesterday. It broke out to new all-time highs in May and has been consolidating above those levels since. Financials have emerged as the strongest sector within the S&P 500 this week following months of underperformance.

Total option volume was more than twice the daily average in WFC yesterday, with calls outnumbering puts by a bullish 4-to-1 ratio.
 
don't read into things.

they are doing great huh.

this could be good or bad.

If the people are also doing well then its good huh
 
You sure are going to be holding those Apple shares a long time if you are waiting for it to go to $900. I mean you are only looking for a 73% increase in the share price.

Good luck with that.
All, I repeat all blue chip stock investments I make wind up as capital gains!
Not that you report many of those
 
All, I repeat all blue chip stock investments I make wind up as capital gains!
Not that you report many of those

Interesting, because the only one you have admitted to buying you are down 25% which means it has to return 50% just for you to break even. As far as the rest of your claims, you haven't backed any of them up. You like to tell us what you did in hindsight, but you don't come out before hand.

You are a joke and a fraud. I have proved it time and time again.

So what year did you retire? 2010? 2009? Come on fess up. Don't be a puss.

BTW. I have told you time and time again, I keep my investing very simple. I go long and short the S&P 500. I also trade the VIX every once in a while and also dabble in GLD. I don't fool around with individual stocks.
 
Interesting, because the only one you have admitted to buying you are down 25% which means it has to return 50% just for you to break even. As far as the rest of your claims, you haven't backed any of them up. You like to tell us what you did in hindsight, but you don't come out before hand.

You are a joke and a fraud. I have proved it time and time again.

So what year did you retire? 2010? 2009? Come on fess up. Don't be a puss.

BTW. I have told you time and time again, I keep my investing very simple. I go long and short the S&P 500. I also trade the VIX every once in a while and also dabble in GLD. I don't fool around with individual stocks.
I'll put my returns up to yours any day!
You haven to bet at least $1,000
 
I'll put my returns up to yours any day!
You haven to bet at least $1,000

So let's get this straight. You think it is too personal to disclose when you retired, but now you want to compare returns?

OK. I'll play. I have averaged a 120% return every year for the last 20 years. Beat that.
 
Back
Top