FEMOCRAT scandals in the news

[Русский агент]

PARTNERS IN LIFE, SLIMY STEVE AND HIS DIRTY WIFE​

In the wake of Dirty Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s roasting in FEMOCRAT Party stalwart Donna Brazile’s book and the her failure to fire a tech aide who was under FBI investigation, her husband is now accused of trying to rip off an elderly homeowner, according to a lawsuit recently filed in Fort Lauderdale.

Banker Slimy Steve Schultz, Dirty Debbie’s husband, allegedly tried to have 70-year-old Frank DiMaria hand over the deed of his $4 million property in Pompano Beach to Schultz personally, according to the complaint.

DiMaria says Schultz tried to intimidate him into surrendering his property to him.

“Mr. Schultz called Mr. DiMaria and proposed that he sign the Pompano Beach property over to Mr. Schultz personally,” the lawsuit reads. “Mr. DiMaria replied by stating, ‘Are you out of your mind?’

“Mr. Schultz replied by stating ‘no’ and further stating something to the effect of ‘no matter how big a lawyer you get or how many, I will destroy you and them and you know I have the power to do it.”



http://www.miamiherald.com/entertainment/ent-columns-blogs/jose-lambiet/article187360243.html

 

[Русский агент]

FILTHY FEMOCRAT IS FREE FOR NOW​

After a mistrial was declared in the federal corruption trial of FEMOCRAT Sen. Robert Menendez, the main question on everyone's mind is, will the government retry him?

The U.S. government will weigh many factors after jurors failed to reach unanimous agreement on any of the 18 counts in a 2015 indictment of Menendez and his co-defendant, Salomon Melgen, a close friend and wealthy donor.

Menendez is up for re-election next year. If he is retried, the senator could face the prospect of running for office at the same time he is defending himself in court.

The Justice Department said it "will carefully consider next steps in this important matter and report to the court at the appropriate time."

Even if he is not tried on the same charges, the majority leader in the U.S. Senate is calling for the Senate Ethics Committee to investigate.




http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2017/11/should_federal_prosecutors_retry_menendez.html

 

[Русский агент]

We know that former President Clinton engineered a meeting with President Obama’s attorney general, Loretta Lynch, on the tarmac of the Phoenix Airport on June 27, 2016.

That’s the official story, replete with the charming and intentionally disarming detail that all they talked about was their grandchildren.

It was just coincidental, don’t you know, that at the time the FBI was looking into Hillary Clinton’s use of a “personal” email server to send, receive and store classified information.

And it was also simply coincidental that just a few days later, the director of the FBI – who served under Attorney General Lynch – announced that he wouldn’t recommend a prosecution of Hillary Clinton.



http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/12/03/new-documents-reveal-fbis-clinton-cover-up.html

 

[Русский агент]

WHAT DIFFERENCE, AT THIS POINT, DOES IT MAKE?​

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D., Mo.) took action earlier this year to make her family's private plane untrackable by the public, according to documents obtained from the Federal Aviation Administration.

McCaskill garnered much criticism ahead of her last reelection campaign over her use of a private jet at taxpayer expense that she demanded her husband "sell the damn plane."

They bought a new, more expensive plane shortly after she won that election. Now, as she gears up for her next election fight, they have taken action to limit scrutiny of the plane's use.

The company hired by McCaskill to operate the plane wrote to the FAA to ask that tracking information on the plane be blocked from the public.

Prior to 2013, private aircraft owners or operators had to present a "certified security concern" to the FAA if they wanted to block their aircraft data from public display.

However, changes made during the Obama administration removed this requirement and "make the aircraft blocking process as simple as possible."

Representatives for McCaskill did not respond to multiple inquiries into the reason for the request and whether it had to do with her upcoming election.




http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/11/27/claire-mccaskill-took-action-to-hide-travel-on-private-plane-from-public.html