FELONY - Pedodent Brandon gives free cell phones to illegal alien invaders

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
Section 1324 of title 8 of the US code makes it a federal felony to encourage illegals to live here. This certainly qualifies as does giving these monsters free schooling and free health care and drivers licenses and welfare. Pedo Joe says "hell with the law. Hey look at that cute 8 year old."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/bi...al-immigrants-to-track-and-check-in-with-them

april 6 2022 The White House confirmed Wednesday that illegal immigrants are being provided with electronic devices, notably cell phones, in an effort for the Biden administration to "track" and "check in" with them as they await immigration court proceedings.

Asked by Fox News White House correspondent Peter Doocy about the initiative, White House press secretary Jen Psaki the purpose was to monitor illegal immigrants.

Psaki said the handing out of smartphones "is all part of our effort as individuals come into the United States and individuals who are entering who will proceed to immigration proceedings to monitor and track where they are."

She said the "vast, vast majority of people are appearing" on time as a result of the Biden administration's monitoring efforts.

Doocy asked Psaki whether there was concern by anyone in the administration that some migrants may decide to take the phones and "toss them."

"Do you have a record people throwing phones away," she responded.
 
Section 1324 of title 8 of the US code makes it a federal felony to encourage illegals to live here. This certainly qualifies as does giving these monsters free schooling and free health care and drivers licenses and welfare. Pedo Joe says "hell with the law. Hey look at that cute 8 year old."

So what's the plan? Impeach Biden after January 2023 and make Harris President or assassinate Biden as a criminal who stole the election and then Harris is still President? LOL
 
Section 1324 of title 8 of the US code makes it a federal felony to encourage illegals to live here. This certainly qualifies as does giving these monsters free schooling and free health care and drivers licenses and welfare. Pedo Joe says "hell with the law. Hey look at that cute 8 year old."

I would gladly have ANY 10 illegal aliens (and I will just have to hope they are not 'naughty') come to America if it meant permanently deporting you.

I mean that 100%.

You are a disgrace to everything good in America, IMO.


Have a WONDERFUL day.
 
Section 1324 of title 8 of the US code makes it a federal felony to encourage illegals to live here. This certainly qualifies as does giving these monsters free schooling and free health care and drivers licenses and welfare. Pedo Joe says "hell with the law. Hey look at that cute 8 year old."
Show us the Immigration clause in our federal Constitution, right-wingers.
 
Section 1324 of title 8 of the US code makes it a federal felony to encourage illegals to live here. This certainly qualifies as does giving these monsters free schooling and free health care and drivers licenses and welfare. Pedo Joe says "hell with the law. Hey look at that cute 8 year old."

Foxnews, and that explains it at a troll promoting fake, misinformation and propaganda media trash. As a half assed troll and ignoramus, consider the following complete facts when it comes to immigration and asylum seekers:

What Is Asylum?
Asylum is a protection granted to foreign nationals already in the United States or arriving at the border who meet the international law definition of a “refugee.” The United Nations 1951 Convention and 1967 Protocol define a refugee as a person who is unable or unwilling to return to his or her home country, and cannot obtain protection in that country, due to past persecution or a well-founded fear of being persecuted in the future “on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” Congress incorporated this definition into U.S. immigration law in the Refugee Act of 1980.

As a signatory to the 1967 Protocol, and through U.S. immigration law, the United States has legal obligations to provide protection to those who qualify as refugees. The Refugee Act established two paths to obtain refugee status—either from abroad as a resettled refugee or in the United States as an asylum seeker.

How Does Asylum Help People Fleeing Persecution?
An asylee—or a person granted asylum—is protected from being returned to his or her home country, is authorized to work in the United States, may apply for a Social Security card, may request permission to travel overseas, and can petition to bring family members to the United States. Asylees may also be eligible for certain government programs, such as Medicaid or Refugee Medical Assistance.

After one year, an asylee may apply for lawful permanent resident status (i.e., a green card). Once the individual becomes a permanent resident, he or she must wait four years to apply for citizenship.

What Is the Asylum Application Process?
There are two primary ways in which a person may apply for asylum in the United States: the affirmative process and the defensive process.

Affirmative Asylum: A person who is not in removal proceedings may affirmatively apply for asylum through U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), a division of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). If the USCIS asylum officer does not grant the asylum application and the applicant does not have a lawful immigration status, he or she is referred to the immigration court for removal proceedings, where he or she may renew the request for asylum through the defensive process and appear before an immigration judge.
Defensive Asylum: A person who is in removal proceedings may apply for asylum defensively by filing the application with an immigration judge at the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) in the Department of Justice. In other words, asylum is applied for as a defense against removal from the U.S. Unlike the criminal court system, EOIR does not provide appointed counsel for individuals in immigration court, even if they are unable to retain an attorney on their own.
Asylum seekers who arrive at a U.S. port of entry or enter the United States without inspection generally must apply through the defensive asylum process. Both application processes require the asylum seeker to be physically present in the United States.

With or without counsel, an asylum seeker has the burden of proving that he or she meets the definition of a refugee. Asylum seekers often provide substantial evidence throughout the affirmative and defensive processes demonstrating either past persecution or that they have a “well-founded fear” of future persecution in their home country. However, the individual’s own testimony is usually critical to his or her asylum determination.

Certain factors bar individuals from asylum. With limited exceptions, individuals who fail to apply for asylum within one year of entering the United States will be barred from receiving asylum. Similarly, applicants who are found to pose a danger to the United States are barred from asylum." This is also federal law.

https://www.americanimmigrationcoun...a protection granted,or her home country, and

Furthermore, it appears this claim of giving illegal immigrants cell phones is false as in bullshit as a bill or possible proposal:

Bloggers charge that new immigration legislation includes "a taxpayer funded cellular phone" for new immigrants. Their evidence is based on something else entirely: a public safety program aimed at beefing up border security.

The bill includes grants aimed at helping American ranchers and others in remote locations along the border get satellite phone service so they can be in touch with authorities. And Rubio can point to a well-documented case in which a rancher was killed on his property, and authorities said better phone service would have made a difference in speeding up their response to the case.

We rate the claim False.
https://www.politifact.com/factchec...ants-would-get-free-cell-phones-under-new-pr/
 
Last edited:
There is a law against being in this country illegally.
We have a Commerce Clause. Why is that public policy not market friendly, right-wingers? Prefer your socialism on a national or international basis instead of Capitalism like y'all allege in socialism threads?
 
Section 1324 of title 8 of the US code makes it a federal felony to encourage illegals to live here. This certainly qualifies as does giving these monsters free schooling and free health care and drivers licenses and welfare. Pedo Joe says "hell with the law. Hey look at that cute 8 year old."
That code may be repugnant to our Commerce Clause, right-wingers. And, there is no Immigration clause in our federal Constitution to be legal to. Obey express Constitutional Law right-wingers, don't merely be immoral hypocrite practitioners of the abomination of hypocrisy (unto God with a McCarthy era phrase in our pledge.)

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,

Bear true witness to our own laws, right-wingers.

Job 34:30 That the hypocrite reign not, lest the people be ensnared.
Vote Blue not Red!
 
There is a law against being in this country illegally.

Agreed. Unfortunately, the focus is on keeping illegals out and not eliminating why they want to come to America.

The most effective thing in the past 40 years to slow down illegal immigration was the Great Recession. If we have another recession as is being predicted, then it should see another drop in illegal immigration.

Obviously the draw is jobs and cheap housing. Since no sane person wants to induce a recession to slow illegal immigration, my suggestion is to start arresting anyone who hires, harbors or otherwise supports or entices illegals to come to the US. Six months in prison for the first offense. A year for the second.
 
Agreed. Unfortunately, the focus is on keeping illegals out and not eliminating why they want to come to America.

The most effective thing in the past 40 years to slow down illegal immigration was the Great Recession. If we have another recession as is being predicted, then it should see another drop in illegal immigration.

Obviously the draw is jobs and cheap housing. Since no sane person wants to induce a recession to slow illegal immigration, my suggestion is to start arresting anyone who hires, harbors or otherwise supports or entices illegals to come to the US. Six months in prison for the first offense. A year for the second.

Good luck in getting the Republican businessmen to go along with that.
 
Good luck in getting the Republican businessmen to go along with that.

Which is why NOTHING has been done on it since Reagan except the fucked up, useless idea of a fucking wall....another idea that wasn't Trumps. LOL

Oddly, Trump's own terrorists proved walls don't work.

4thlz0.jpg
 
We have a Commerce Clause. Why is that public policy not market friendly, right-wingers? Prefer your socialism on a national or international basis instead of Capitalism like y'all allege in socialism threads?

Capitalism has nothing to do with the Biden Administration allowing an influx of illegals into this country.
 
Agreed. Unfortunately, the focus is on keeping illegals out and not eliminating why they want to come to America.

The most effective thing in the past 40 years to slow down illegal immigration was the Great Recession. If we have another recession as is being predicted, then it should see another drop in illegal immigration.

Obviously the draw is jobs and cheap housing. Since no sane person wants to induce a recession to slow illegal immigration, my suggestion is to start arresting anyone who hires, harbors or otherwise supports or entices illegals to come to the US. Six months in prison for the first offense. A year for the second.

I've said before many times those who hire ("Human Resources" personnel especially) illegals should be jailed and fined heavily.
 
I've said before many times those who hire ("Human Resources" personnel especially) illegals should be jailed and fined heavily.

Why are you letting the CEOs get a pass? They're the assholes giving the orders, not setting the criteria.
 
Why are you letting the CEOs get a pass? They're the assholes giving the orders, not setting the criteria.

Using that philosophy, we should hold gun manufacturers responsible when an asshole shoots someone?

Often, CEOs don't even know who their "Human Resources" idiots are hiring, especially in large corporations.
 
Using that philosophy, we should hold gun manufacturers responsible when an asshole shoots someone?

Often, CEOs don't even know who their "Human Resources" idiots are hiring, especially in large corporations.

Bullshit, dude, and I sincerely hope you do realize what you just wrote was a bullshit comparison; there's a major fucking difference between the boss of an organization who both controls and should be held responsible his HR staff versus Ford being held responsible for all the DUIs on JPP who were driving Fords.

If a CEO is so clueless, why do you think they rate all the big bucks? Isn't it their fucking job?

In the Navy, if the Officer of the Watch is a junior grade officer and makes a mistake resulting in the collision with another vessel, who is ultimately responsible? According to the Navy, the Commanding Officer, the Captain of the ship. He was given a position of responsibility protecting the lives of every person under him/her. His failure to properly qualify his crew enough to avoid a collision with another fucking boat in open water is inexcusable.

RB, you, sir, are an example of majority of the American public who are willing to let our leaders, both business and politics, dodge their responsibilities for arbitrary reasons. There's a general national failure to hold our leaders to a higher standard appropriate for their position since 1992 and here we are, 30 fucking years later, seeing the results.

If you want to invest your life savings in a company or fund run by a CEO who doesn't have a fucking clue what his HR department is doing, that's your choice. I prefer competent leaders.

I believe we are on Earth to make choices. It's part of having Free Will. Some people choose to do nothing. Some overreact. Some try to use reason. All are choices. It's up to you. Me? I blame the CO/CEO for any mistakes in the company.

17 US Sailors died in this collision. There needs to be a bond of trust between We, the People and our leaders...and our leaders should be held accountable for their actions. That's not happening because We, the People are dividing ourselves over politics...which plays into their hands.

5c76b844e369c.image.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top