Federal scientist cooked climate change books ahead of Obama presentation

Micawber said:
I am sorry the truth is an attack on your identity. 😂
Click to expand...
Not in the least, whenever I see somebody using words like denialist then I know they veer more towards Scientology than science.

I suggest that you Google the Arrhenius equation and Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity. The widely accepted current value for ECS is 1.2k. Of course that value isn't scary enough for a doubling of CO2 since the start of the Industrial Age to around 2080, roughly 300 years, hence the need to invent positive feedbacks that only exist in climate models.

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2013/09...-is-not-based-upon-physical-first-principles/

Sent from Lenovo K5 Note:
To piss off snowflakes, bottom feeders and racists
 
Last edited:
Milagro said:
Not in the least, whenever I see somebody using words like denialist then I know they veer more towards Scientology than science.

I suggest that you Google the Arrhenius equation and Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity. The widely accepted current value for ECS is 1.2k. Of course that value isn't scary enough for a doubling of CO2 since the start of the Industrial Age to around 2080, roughly 300 years, hence the need to invent positive feedbacks that only exist in climate models.

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2013/09...-is-not-based-upon-physical-first-principles/

Sent from Lenovo K5 Note:
To piss off snowflakes, bottom feeders and racists
Click to expand...

You simply subscribe to the 3% of experts who deny climate change. You also appear to accept or repeat as valid only the absolute lowest value in the literature as detailed here:

https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch9s9-6-2.html

The median values of these studies vary from 1.2 to 5

I'll go with the 97% of experts. Even Big Oil is on board.

Let me guess, you are an avid Fox viewer, live in a rural area and believe in Jesus.
 
Micawber said:
Exxon and British petroleum must be liberals.[emoji28]
Click to expand...

I am sure they have their reasons mostly financial.

I don't base my opinions not on what Chevron or BP say but common sense and my deep understanding of the scientific method.

If you want to believe a fairy tale have at it.

Why do you care if I believe it or not. It has no impact on you eschewing fossil fuels
 
cawacko said:
Set to walk free? There's no guarantee he's getting out. And enjoy his millions? His pension is $25K/mnth. So $300K/yr.

Anyway, Fvck that racist Nevada judge that locked him up.
Click to expand...

Your love for him is so great you are prepared to ignore the fact that he's a vicious killer.

Sent from Lenovo K5 Note:
To piss off snowflakes, bottom feeders and racists

Micawber said:
You simply subscribe to the 3% of experts who deny climate change. You also appear to accept or repeat as valid only the absolute lowest value in the literature as detailed here:

https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch9s9-6-2.html

The median values of these studies vary from 1.2 to 5

I'll go with the 97% of experts. Even Big Oil is on board.

Let me guess, you are an avid Fox viewer, live in a rural area and believe in Jesus.
Click to expand...

It is clear that you are not very bright, I live in England, have an honours degree in chemistry, non religious and live in a big city. Oh and couldn't you get anything newer than 2007. I can't be bothered with idiots, there are just too many to deal with.

I was watching Fox today though, as this Thai hotel doesn't have the BBC.
Micawber said:
You simply subscribe to the 3% of experts who deny climate change. You also appear to accept or repeat as valid only the absolute lowest value in the literature as detailed here:

https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch9s9-6-2.html

The median values of these studies vary from 1.2 to 5

I'll go with the 97% of experts. Even Big Oil is on board.

Let me guess, you are an avid Fox viewer, live in a rural area and believe in Jesus.
Click to expand...


Sent from Lenovo K5 Note:
To piss off snowflakes, bottom feeders and racists
 
Last edited:
Micawber said:
You simply subscribe to the 3% of experts who deny climate change. You also appear to accept or repeat as valid only the absolute lowest value in the literature as detailed here:

https://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/ar4/wg1/en/ch9s9-6-2.html

The median values of these studies vary from 1.2 to 5

I'll go with the 97% of experts. Even Big Oil is on board.

Let me guess, you are an avid Fox viewer, live in a rural area and believe in Jesus.
Click to expand...

Are you intentionally being sloppy with the language?

I don't know anyone who denies that the climate changes. It changes four times a year

What is in dispute is whether man is impacting the climate to such an extent that the erf will be destroyed.

It won't.

All of the "science" that you have put your faith in are nothing more than climate models. Mathematical modeling is inherently flawed as it is dependent on the inputs. Any incorrect input will have monumental effects on the outputs. Get more than one input wrong and your errors increase exponentially.

But if you insist on believing in fairy tales be my guest. I am sure there are still adults who believe in Santa Claus
 
I Love America said:
Are you intentionally being sloppy with the language?

I don't know anyone who denies that the climate changes. It changes four times a year

What is in dispute is whether man is impacting the climate to such an extent that the erf will be destroyed.

It won't.

All of the "science" that you have put your faith in are nothing more than climate models. Mathematical modeling is inherently flawed as it is dependent on the inputs. Any incorrect input will have monumental effects on the outputs. Get more than one input wrong and your errors increase exponentially.

But if you insist on believing in fairy tales be my guest. I am sure there are still adults who believe in Santa Claus
Click to expand...
Witness the fact that they have to be constantly tweaked with many fudge factors to cope with real world behaviour. Not one model is capable of predicting the future.

Sent from Lenovo K5 Note:
To piss off snowflakes, bottom feeders and racists
 
The German former head of energy RWE renewable energy division says that the Energiewende has been an unmitigated disaster for Germany. He states frankly that an affordable storage solution should have been developed before wind turbines and solar were deployed.This is the voice of reason and experience talking. He also applauds Switzerland for not getting rid of their nuclear reactors.

http://notrickszone.com/2017/03/05/...ermany-sacrificing-nature-for-green-energies/

Sent from Lenovo K5 Note:
To piss off snowflakes, bottom feeders and racists
 
All the dumbass deniers are also Trump suckers.

Pretty much tells you right there the intellectual level they're working with....

gopboxorocks.jpg
 
Nomad said:
All the dumbass deniers are also Trump suckers.

Pretty much tells you right there the intellectual level they're working with....

gopboxorocks.jpg
Click to expand...
You're a very stupid person Gonad, very stupid indeed.

Sent from Lenovo K5 Note:
To piss off snowflakes, bottom feeders and racists
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top