Federal judge writes law legalizing dismemberment abortion.

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
There is nothing in the constitution about abortion which means (by the tenth amendment) it is entirely a state issue. The judge says the constitution grants women the right to abortion and that is a brazen lie the courts have been peddling for 44 years.

http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2017/11/25/federal-judge-overturns-texas-ban-dismemberment-abortions/

nov 25 2017 A federal judge has struck down a Texas law that bans second-trimester dismemberment abortions, those in which an unborn baby is “torn limb from limb” and then extracted from the uterus.
U.S. District Judge Lee Yeakel ruled that banning dismemberment abortion – a form of “D&E” (dilation and evacuation) abortion – places an “undue burden” upon women.

“The State’s valid interest in promoting respect for the life of the unborn, although legitimate, is not sufficient to justify such a substantial obstacle to the constitutionally protected right of a woman to terminate a pregnancy before fetal viability,” the judge wrote.
 
There is nothing in the constitution about abortion which means (by the tenth amendment) it is entirely a state issue. The judge says the constitution grants women the right to abortion and that is a brazen lie the courts have been peddling for 44 years.
There is nothing in the Constitution about murder or robbery either....are they just state issues....?
there are federal laws against murder and robbery of course, and these laws have been justified under the Necessary and Proper Clause of the Constitution, as well as the Commerce Clause, why not abortion ?....because liberals refuse to see it as murder and the fetus is just a blob of tissue....even though its no different in the womb as it is
10 seconds after it comes out of the womb in birth....
the left must be jumping for joy over this ruling.......
 
There is nothing in the constitution about abortion which means (by the tenth amendment) it is entirely a state issue. The judge says the constitution grants women the right to abortion and that is a brazen lie the courts have been peddling for 44 years.
There is nothing in the Constitution about murder or robbery either....are they just state issues....?
there are federal laws against murder and robbery of course, and these laws have been justified under the Necessary and Proper Clause of the Constitution, as well as the Commerce Clause, why not abortion ?....because liberals refuse to see it as murder and the fetus is just a blob of tissue....even though its no different in the womb as it is 10 seconds after it comes out of the womb in normal birth....
the left must be jumping for joy over this ruling.......
 
There is nothing in the Constitution about murder or robbery either....are they just state issues....?
there are federal laws against murder and robbery of course, and these laws have been justified under the Necessary and Proper Clause of the Constitution, as well as the Commerce Clause, why not abortion ?....because liberals refuse to see it as murder and the fetus is just a blob of tissue....even though its no different in the womb as it is
10 seconds after it comes out of the womb in birth....
the left must be jumping for joy over this ruling.......

you seem to have that issue a bit wrong. murder and robbery are state crimes. the only time they become federal issues is when the crime crosses state lines or when a federal institution like a bank is involved.
 
There is nothing in the constitution about abortion which means (by the tenth amendment) it is entirely a state issue. The judge says the constitution grants women the right to abortion and that is a brazen lie the courts have been peddling for 44 years.

My dear, do you even know what the fuck you are talking about? Do you think that a federal judge may know more about the constitution than a piece of low life shit like you does?
 
There is nothing in the constitution about abortion which means (by the tenth amendment) it is entirely a state issue. The judge says the constitution grants women the right to abortion and that is a brazen lie the courts have been peddling for 44 years.

Furthermore cunt face, he was placed on the Federal bench by a Republican president.
 
My dear, do you even know what the fuck you are talking about? Do you think that a federal judge may know more about the constitution than a piece of low life shit like you does?


HAHAHA. You call that an argument.??? This judge knows he's in the wrong but he doesn't care. Some pro-abortion group paid him a bribe and that's that. THINK, hate-filled
moron.
 
My dear, do you even know what the fuck you are talking about? Do you think that a federal judge may know more about the constitution than a piece of low life shit like you does?

no, most federal judges do NOT know more about the constitution than most of us. at least those of us who aren't morons who need lawyers and judges to tell us what to do.
 
no, most federal judges do NOT know more about the constitution than most of us. at least those of us who aren't morons who need lawyers and judges to tell us what to do.

I never knew you would be a constitutional expert without spending a single day within 2 blocks of a law school
 
I never knew you would be a constitutional expert without spending a single day within 2 blocks of a law school

that's because you think people are dumb as fucking rocks, which is probably just you projecting your own idiocy on the rest of the population.

ALL you need to know about the constitution (AND WHAT IT MEANS) is in the debates, minutes, commentaries, and ratification results. That is because WE THE PEOPLE wrote the constitution. What you're doing is allowing a cadre of central government stooges known as the executive, legislative, and judicial branches tell you what THEY want you to think because you're lazy, stupid, and apathetic.
 
Back
Top