Federal judge rules Oregon’s tough new gun law is constitutional

Guno צְבִי

Guno צְבִי

We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
A federal judge has ruled Oregon’s voter-approved gun control measure – one of the toughest in the nation – is constitutional.

U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut ruled that banning large capacity magazines and requiring a permit to purchase a gun falls in line with “the nation’s history and tradition of regulating uniquely dangerous features of weapons and firearms to protect public safety," Oregon Public Broadcasting reported.

The decision comes after a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision on the Second Amendment that has upended gun laws across the country, dividing judges and sowing confusion over what firearm restrictions can remain on the books. It changed the test that lower courts had long used for evaluating challenges to firearm restrictions, telling judges that gun laws must be consistent with the “historical tradition of firearm regulation.”

https://news.yahoo.com/federal-judge-rules-oregon-tough-011750148.html
 
guno said:
A federal judge has ruled Oregon’s voter-approved gun control measure – one of the toughest in the nation – is constitutional.

U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut ruled that banning large capacity magazines and requiring a permit to purchase a gun falls in line with “the nation’s history and tradition of regulating uniquely dangerous features of weapons and firearms to protect public safety," Oregon Public Broadcasting reported.

The decision comes after a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision on the Second Amendment that has upended gun laws across the country, dividing judges and sowing confusion over what firearm restrictions can remain on the books. It changed the test that lower courts had long used for evaluating challenges to firearm restrictions, telling judges that gun laws must be consistent with the “historical tradition of firearm regulation.”

https://news.yahoo.com/federal-judge-rules-oregon-tough-011750148.html
Click to expand...

About time that a judge actually understands the second amendment. No one here seem to have the foggiest idea.
 
guno said:
A federal judge has ruled Oregon’s voter-approved gun control measure – one of the toughest in the nation – is constitutional.

U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut ruled that banning large capacity magazines and requiring a permit to purchase a gun falls in line with “the nation’s history and tradition of regulating uniquely dangerous features of weapons and firearms to protect public safety," Oregon Public Broadcasting reported.

The decision comes after a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision on the Second Amendment that has upended gun laws across the country, dividing judges and sowing confusion over what firearm restrictions can remain on the books. It changed the test that lower courts had long used for evaluating challenges to firearm restrictions, telling judges that gun laws must be consistent with the “historical tradition of firearm regulation.”

https://news.yahoo.com/federal-judge-rules-oregon-tough-011750148.html
Click to expand...

Karin Immergut does not have authority to change the Constitution of the United States nor the constitution of the State of Oregon. Oregon's gun laws that ban or limit any weapon are unconstitutional.
 
Concart said:
About time that a judge actually understands the second amendment. No one here seem to have the foggiest idea.
Click to expand...

Discarding the 2nd amendment is not 'understanding the 2nd amendment'. No judge has authority to change the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of the State of Oregon.
 
Into the Night said:
Karin Immergut does not have authority to change the Constitution of the United States nor the constitution of the State of Oregon. Oregon's gun laws that ban or limit any weapon are unconstitutional.
Click to expand...

You have never spent a single second with the Oregon Constitution, all you can spew are lies and bullshiot
 
floridafan said:
You have never spent a single second with the Oregon Constitution, all you can spew are lies and bullshiot
Click to expand...

Oregon State Constitution said:
Right to bear arms; military subordinate to civil power. The people shall have the right to bear arms for the defence of themselves, and the State, but the Military shall be kept in strict subordination to the civil power
Click to expand...

Ya dumb gator. You don't live in Oregon or even the Pacific Northwest.
 
Hello guno,

guno said:
A federal judge has ruled Oregon’s voter-approved gun control measure – one of the toughest in the nation – is constitutional.

U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut ruled that banning large capacity magazines and requiring a permit to purchase a gun falls in line with “the nation’s history and tradition of regulating uniquely dangerous features of weapons and firearms to protect public safety," Oregon Public Broadcasting reported.

The decision comes after a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision on the Second Amendment that has upended gun laws across the country, dividing judges and sowing confusion over what firearm restrictions can remain on the books. It changed the test that lower courts had long used for evaluating challenges to firearm restrictions, telling judges that gun laws must be consistent with the “historical tradition of firearm regulation.”

https://news.yahoo.com/federal-judge-rules-oregon-tough-011750148.html
Click to expand...

Oregon just got safer.
 
floridafan said:
You have never spent a single second with the Oregon Constitution, all you can spew are lies and bullshiot
Click to expand...

And the current SCOTUS ruling says this is absolutely constitutional. They don't know the constitution. And they certainly don't understand precedent. The judges ruling is completely consistent with Heller.
 
We will see what the Supreme Court says.

They typically don't like other judges trampling on their rulings.

Doesn't look good for Oregon.

All they have managed to do is to set further precedent that states can't do this.
 
Tinkerpeach said:
We will see what the Supreme Court says.

They typically don't like other judges trampling on their rulings.

Doesn't look good for Oregon.

All they have managed to do is to set further precedent that states can't do this.
Click to expand...

Like you have a fucking idea what you are spewing!
 
Tinkerpeach said:
We will see what the Supreme Court says.

They typically don't like other judges trampling on their rulings.

Doesn't look good for Oregon.

All they have managed to do is to set further precedent that states can't do this.
Click to expand...

Many states already have gun laws restricting assault weapons, magazines, and similar regulations. The courts have never ruled those regulations are unconstitutional.
 
Flash said:
Many states already have gun laws restricting assault weapons, magazines, and similar regulations. The courts have never ruled those regulations are unconstitutional.
Click to expand...

This is the first gun law to be challenged since the Court's ruling last June.

They are restricting magazines with more than 10 rounds so the fact that other states may have rules in place is irrelevant as none of them have come to the Court yet.

It's doubtful the Court will uphold this law given their previous stance on this issue.

This law has many flaws also.

You can have more than 10 rounds if you are in the military or law enforcement, if you are in your home....other things.

That is not equal and fair treatment.

It is my opinion that the Court will strike this down.
 
It was beginning to be clear in the 80's that the courts are not going to protect our Constitutional rights.....anyone at this point who still expects that has not been paying attention.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top