Federal Judge Rules Against Bragg, Former Prosecutor will testify before Congress...

Damocles

Accedo!
Staff member
Two Sources so everyone can be happy, See B.S. News and westernjournal. The stories are very much the same, but y'all want to pretend the one is better than the other so, here:

See B.S. News said:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/judge-...ejected an,into former President Donald Trump.

A federal judge rejected an effort by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg to block a Congressional subpoena of a former prosecutor for that office who had worked on an investigation into former President Donald Trump.

More at link...

and

Western Journal said:
https://www.westernjournal.com/fede...&ff_campaign=manualpost&ff_content=2023-04-20

A federal judge has rejected efforts by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg to block a former prosecutor in his office from testifying before the House Judiciary Committee.

In her ruling Wednesday, U.S. District Court Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil said former prosecutor Mark Pomerantz, scheduled to testify at 10 a.m. Thursday, “must appear for the congressional deposition. No one is above the law.”

More at link...
 
Oh Goody, we get another episode of the Jim Jordan clown show! I can't wait.

funny, the judge is essentially calling Bragg a clown in the summary

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.597015/gov.uscourts.nysd.597015.44.0.pdf





-------------
The first 35 pages of the Complaint have little to do with the subpoena at issue and are
nothing short of a public relations tirade against former President and current presidential
candidate Donald Trump. The same is true of the vast majority of the exhibits accompanying the
Boutrous Declaration
 
And just as Jimmy Jordan himself did, the guy can ignore Jordan’s subpoena

Besides, the guy quit not because Bragg was appointed, but rather because he felt Bragg didn’t pursue Trump aggressively enough, so what’s Jordan going to get? He just wants a show hearing so he and the others can air their innuendos, always makes good show on Fox
 
And just as Jimmy Jordan himself did, the guy can ignore Jordan’s subpoena

Besides, the guy quit not because Bragg was appointed, but rather because he felt Bragg didn’t pursue Trump aggressively enough, so what’s Jordan going to get? He just wants a show hearing so he and the others can air their innuendos, always makes good show on Fox


Uh...no.


" A federal judge has rejected efforts by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg to block a former prosecutor in his office from testifying before the House Judiciary Committee."
 
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna80615



Appeals court temporarily blocks former prosecutor's testimony before House panel
The ruling comes after a district judge ordered Mark Pomerantz, who worked for the Manhattan DA’s office, to testify before the GOP-led Judiciary Committee probing Trump's prosecution.
 
And just as Jimmy Jordan himself did, the guy can ignore Jordan’s subpoena

Besides, the guy quit not because Bragg was appointed, but rather because he felt Bragg didn’t pursue Trump aggressively enough, so what’s Jordan going to get? He just wants a show hearing so he and the others can air their innuendos, always makes good show on Fox

It's also how they are defending their glorious leader, #TRE45ON, by making the DA look like someone who is playing politics rather than conducting a righteous prosecution of their corrupt #IMPOTUSx2.

And they whine that (D)s have "weaponized the judicial system."
 
funny, the judge is essentially calling Bragg a clown in the summary

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.597015/gov.uscourts.nysd.597015.44.0.pdf




-------------
The first 35 pages of the Complaint have little to do with the subpoena at issue and are
nothing short of a public relations tirade against former President and current presidential
candidate Donald Trump. The same is true of the vast majority of the exhibits accompanying the
Boutrous Declaration

Can you show us exactly where the Judge “essentially called Bragg a clown? She concluded in the conclusion that the “Court does not endorse either side,” so show us where he implied Bragg was a clown
 
This judge was appointed by trump after VERY LITTLE experience as a judge


She did bankruptcy law for decades as a lawyer
 
Uh...no.


" A federal judge has rejected efforts by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg to block a former prosecutor in his office from testifying before the House Judiciary Committee."

Which appropriately has nothing to do with what I posted, typical “copy”
 
It's also how they are defending their glorious leader, #TRE45ON, by making the DA look like someone who is playing politics rather than conducting a righteous prosecution of their corrupt #IMPOTUSx2.

And they whine that (D)s have "weaponized the judicial system."

For a motherfucker that's doing righteous prosecutions, the crime rate in NYC is soaring.

And Democrats are trying to weaponize the judicial system. America will stop them.

Someday we'll figure out how to cure TDS and maybe you won't die before then.

Until then, this is you every night and AM:

Night:

xcjVtxF.png


AM:
l8IDjid.jpg
 
Back
Top