Fascist North Carolina tries to Ban Tesla

Timshel

New member
More proof that many Republicans are not the least bit supportive of the free market.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_t...ould_prevent_unfair_competition_with_car.html

From the state that brought you the nation’s first ban on climate science comes another legislative gem: a bill that would prohibit automakers from selling their cars in the state.


The proposal, which the Raleigh News & Observer reports was unanimously approved by the state’s Senate Commerce Committee on Thursday, would apply to all car manufacturers, but the intended target is clear. It’s aimed at Tesla, the only U.S. automaker whose business model relies on selling cars directly to consumers, rather than through a network of third-party dealerships.


The bill is being pushed by the North Carolina Automobile Dealers Association, a trade group representing the state’s franchised dealerships. Its sponsor is state Sen. Tom Apodaca, a Republican from Henderson, who has said the goal is to prevent unfair competition between manufacturers and dealers. What makes it “unfair competition” as opposed to plain-old “competition”—something Republicans are typically inclined to favor—is not entirely clear. After all, North Carolina doesn’t seem to have a problem with Apple selling its computers online or via its own Apple Stores.


Still, it’s easy to understand why some car dealers might feel a little threatened: Tesla’s Model S outsold the Mercedes S-Class, BMW 7 Series, and Audi A8 last quarter without any help from them. If its business model were to catch on, consumers might find that they don’t need the middle-men as much as they thought.


Incidentally—not that he would be in any way swayed by this—I couldn’t help but notice that Apodaca received $8,000 in campaign contributions from the North Carolina Automobile Dealers Association last year, the maximum amount allowed by state law. I’ve reached out to the senator for further comment and will update this post if he replies.http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_t...ould_prevent_unfair_competition_with_car.html
 
The Republicans in Texas are not any more supportive of free markets.

http://www.cato.org/blog/tesla-red-...paign=Feed:+Cato-at-liberty+(Cato+at+Liberty)

In red-state America, the free market is king, right? Progressivism, socialism, the nanny state – those are fightin’ words. And what state could be redder than Texas? Well perhaps it’s still true that liquor’s for drinking and water’s for fighting in Texas, but water isn’t the only thing some Texans think worth fighting for. Legally-protected – read “unfree” – markets are another.

It seems that the folks who make these new-fangled electric cars – Tesla Motors, in particular – have a different sales and service model than traditional manufactures have had since the days of the Model T. As CNN Money explains, under the conventional model, manufacturers
sell cars to independently owned and operated dealers or distributors who, in turn, sell them to the public, usually after some negotiation over the final price.


By contrast, Tesla’s showrooms, of which there are already 37 around the country, are owned and operated by Tesla Motors. Most of the showrooms are in shopping malls with only enough cars kept in inventory for display and for test drives. Also, there’s no haggling. Every Tesla car sells at full sticker price. Service on the cars is performed at separate garages, also owned by Tesla.

Now I hold no brief for these cars or that sales and service model. In fact, I rather like my gas-guzzler, to say nothing of haggling. But I also like the free market, and that’s precisely what Bill Wolters, president of the Texas Automobile Dealers Association, seems not to like. If Tesla chief executive Elon Musk “wants to have a showroom in a mall, that’s fine,” Wolters said, “but he can’t own it.” Fearing that the Tesla sales and service model might encourage other automakers to try it, Wolters is fighting to keep in place the Texas law that prohibits automaker-owned dealerships. Under that law, Tesla can’t sell cars in Texas.
Tesla has showrooms there, but employees can only show off and explain the car. They can’t give test drives or take orders. They can’t mention the price at all, even if customers ask. The current law doesn’t stop anyone in Texas from ordering a Tesla Model S online if they want to. Tesla just can’t deliver it to the customer. The buyer has to arrange for delivery through a third-party shipping company.

 
More proof that many Republicans are not the least bit supportive of the free market.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_t...ould_prevent_unfair_competition_with_car.html

From the state that brought you the nation’s first ban on climate science comes another legislative gem: a bill that would prohibit automakers from selling their cars in the state.


The proposal, which the Raleigh News & Observer reports was unanimously approved by the state’s Senate Commerce Committee on Thursday, would apply to all car manufacturers, but the intended target is clear. It’s aimed at Tesla, the only U.S. automaker whose business model relies on selling cars directly to consumers, rather than through a network of third-party dealerships.


The bill is being pushed by the North Carolina Automobile Dealers Association, a trade group representing the state’s franchised dealerships. Its sponsor is state Sen. Tom Apodaca, a Republican from Henderson, who has said the goal is to prevent unfair competition between manufacturers and dealers. What makes it “unfair competition” as opposed to plain-old “competition”—something Republicans are typically inclined to favor—is not entirely clear. After all, North Carolina doesn’t seem to have a problem with Apple selling its computers online or via its own Apple Stores.


Still, it’s easy to understand why some car dealers might feel a little threatened: Tesla’s Model S outsold the Mercedes S-Class, BMW 7 Series, and Audi A8 last quarter without any help from them. If its business model were to catch on, consumers might find that they don’t need the middle-men as much as they thought.


Incidentally—not that he would be in any way swayed by this—I couldn’t help but notice that Apodaca received $8,000 in campaign contributions from the North Carolina Automobile Dealers Association last year, the maximum amount allowed by state law. I’ve reached out to the senator for further comment and will update this post if he replies.http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_t...ould_prevent_unfair_competition_with_car.html

Maybe, just maybe, they got the idea from liberals who want to stop the private sale of firearms. :)
That would truly be ironic. :chesh:
 
It's stupid, all it would do is ensure that taxes would be collected outside the state of delivery. Currently, even if I work through Tesla, but also if I work through a dealer, the Sales tax I pay on the vehicle is accounted by the place of "delivery" based on my home address. By making it illegal for them to "deliver" a vehicle in that state will just make it so other localities get the tax dollars. I'd still buy my Tesla, because they are way cooler than a Prius.
 
It's stupid, all it would do is ensure that taxes would be collected outside the state of delivery. Currently, even if I work through Tesla, but also if I work through a dealer, the Sales tax I pay on the vehicle is accounted by the place of "delivery" based on my home address. By making it illegal for them to "deliver" a vehicle in that state will just make it so other localities get the tax dollars. I'd still buy my Tesla, because they are way cooler than a Prius.
I can still kick myself in the head. One of the toughest decisions I ever made (well actually under the situaton it wasn't that hard of a decision.....just a painful one.) was to turn down working as a project manager on a contract we have with Tesla. I wanted that project sooooo bad but had to decline for family reasons.

Two weeks ago when I was in Austin at the Texas annual TCEQ conference I saw our Tesla project manager at the bar we were hanging out at. He had that smug self satisfied smile that male porn stars have when they're off the set. I hate the bastard! LOL
 
I can still kick myself in the head. One of the toughest decisions I ever made (well actually under the situaton it wasn't that hard of a decision.....just a painful one.) was to turn down working as a project manager on a contract we have with Tesla. I wanted that project sooooo bad but had to decline for family reasons.

Two weeks ago when I was in Austin at the Texas annual TCEQ conference I saw our Tesla project manager at the bar we were hanging out at. He had that smug self satisfied smile that male porn stars have when they're off the set. I hate the bastard! LOL

Many - many years ago, a motorcycle company was advertising for investors for a company they were starting up.
Shares were as low as $10@, if I remember correctly.

The took a Chevy V-8 and chopped off everything but 2.
Used a cut down crank shaft, cam shaft; but used the same pistons, rings, etc.

I should have taken a leap of faith; but at the time, I just didn't think that another American Motorcycle Company had a chance to compete with HD engines.
 
Back
Top