Espstein and Maxwell Rape Survivor Voted for Trump and Now Feels Betrayed

LurchAddams

LurchAddams

There Can be Only One!
Contributor
www.thedailybeast.com

Betrayed Epstein Victim Says She Voted for Trump Because She Trusted Him ‘to Protect Us’

Jena-Lisa Jones, who was abused when she was just 14, demanded to know who Trump was trying to protect.
www.thedailybeast.com www.thedailybeast.com

"A Jeffrey Epstein survivor who voted for Donald Trump in 2024 has called out the president for suggesting that the sex trafficker’s victims are “lying,” urging him to imagine it was his own daughters who were abused.

Jena-Lisa Jones, who was 14 when she was abused, spoke to Lawrence O’Donnell on The Last Word on Wednesday evening. She described speaking out in front of the Capitol with other survivors as “intense,” and said she felt she was “putting my life on the line.”

Uh oh! And this is amazing because trump and his administration's only efforts have been to exonerate himself. Maxwell's going to get pardon after being rewarded for her lying about trump.

I think this might actually be the thing that sinks him!
 
Sort by date Sort by votes
The Trumpys have to decide if they will protect young girls from sexual abuse or protect Trump and the right-wingers who were involved. The Democrats will not fight to protect Clinton if he is involved. We choose law over politics. Even appearances over politics. Ask Franken if you doubt that. The Reds will protect their criminals at all costs.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
FastLane said:
Lurch where is your proof that Trump victimized anyone?
Click to expand...
What is your answer to why at every turn the White House is fighting each and every attempt to release the Epstein Files, with only redactions to protect the victims?

The latest being the White House now whipping Congress members one by one to vote against legislation that would require the Doj to turn it over to Congress?

Trump Admin is both saying 'there is nothing left to see of any value', while blocking any attempt to 'see it'?

Why not just hand it over, if there is nothing? Does it make sense you protect a file when it has nothing instead of letting them see it and see there is nothing?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
LurchAddams said:
www.thedailybeast.com

Betrayed Epstein Victim Says She Voted for Trump Because She Trusted Him ‘to Protect Us’

Jena-Lisa Jones, who was abused when she was just 14, demanded to know who Trump was trying to protect.
www.thedailybeast.com www.thedailybeast.com

"A Jeffrey Epstein survivor who voted for Donald Trump in 2024 has called out the president for suggesting that the sex trafficker’s victims are “lying,” urging him to imagine it was his own daughters who were abused.

Jena-Lisa Jones, who was 14 when she was abused, spoke to Lawrence O’Donnell on The Last Word on Wednesday evening. She described speaking out in front of the Capitol with other survivors as “intense,” and said she felt she was “putting my life on the line.”

Uh oh! And this is amazing because trump and his administration's only efforts have been to exonerate himself. Maxwell's going to get pardon after being rewarded for her lying about trump.

I think this might actually be the thing that sinks him!
Click to expand...
I am sorry she was abused, but she is one of many who fell for it.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
QP! said:
What is your answer to why at every turn the White House is fighting each and every attempt to release the Epstein Files, with only redactions to protect the victims?

The latest being the White House now whipping Congress members one by one to vote against legislation that would require the Doj to turn it over to Congress?

Trump Admin is both saying 'there is nothing left to see of any value', while blocking any attempt to 'see it'?

Why not just hand it over, if there is nothing? Does it make sense you protect a file when it has nothing instead of letting them see it and see there is nothing?
Click to expand...
Because he knows Ibratards like you are trying to use it like a club to beat him with. He can't release files of people that may have done nothing wrong and do not need wackos like you dragging them into the mud without any real proof. There is a reason FBI doesn't release names of people they investigated. They may be 100% innocent. There is no "list" but if the victims wan't to compile a list I am willing to listen. But I hope they have some evidence to offer.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
FastLane said:
Because he knows Ibratards like you are trying to use it like a club to beat him with. He can't release files of people that may have done nothing wrong and do not need wackos like you dragging them into the mud without any real proof. There is a reason FBI doesn't release names of people they investigated. They may be 100% innocent. There is no "list" but if the victims wan't to compile a list I am willing to listen. But I hope they have some evidence to offer.
Click to expand...
Shine the light and let the people decide. Sunlight is the best disinfectant.

Trust the Citizens.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
FastLane said:
Because he knows Ibratards like you are trying to use it like a club to beat him with. He can't release files of people that may have done nothing wrong and do not need wackos like you dragging them into the mud without any real proof. There is a reason FBI doesn't release names of people they investigated. They may be 100% innocent. There is no "list" but if the victims wan't to compile a list I am willing to listen. But I hope they have some evidence to offer.
Click to expand...
So what is your reason for why he, Bondi, Kash, Dan all promised to do just that prior to getting in office and they did not care about anything you say above then?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
FastLane said:
They didn't realize they would be exposing so many potentially innocent people to public scrutiny.
Click to expand...
So you are saying they are stupid?

No trials were ever held so any promise prior to release it all would have ALWAYS involved lots of "potentially innocent" being opened up to public scrutiny. That was never not a thing. And they would have to operate at imbecile level to not know that.

I can say that now about EVERY SINGLE CASE FILE IN THE DOJ that has not gone to trial. If Trump and Bondi, et al call for them to be exposed to the public then all the people in it who might be innocent will be exposed.

I know that now without looking at a single file as it is true for them ALL.

So how could Trump and Bondi et al not know that?
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top