Editor Is Fired, but Not Silenced, Over the NRA

christiefan915

Catalyst
This is how the NRA takes care of people who defy it. Hope you gun lovers are proud of how they worked to stifle free speech.

"Five days after the shootings in San Bernardino, California, Jan Larson McLaughlin sat down in her home office on her day off and wrote her weekly editorial for the Sentinel-Tribune, circulation 9,000, in Bowling Green, Ohio. McLaughlin has worked for the newspaper for 31 years, the past 2 1/2 as editor-in-chief. She usually writes her editorial in the newsroom, but this one required special care. She was taking on the National Rifle Association, and she was doing it in Ohio.

Her editorial began: "It is time for reasonable gun owners to take back control of the association that supposedly represents them. We as a nation are still mourning one mass shooting when the next occurs. Yet the NRA refuses to discuss any type of gun control, any form of background checks, any type of study that might lead to some answers. Instead, when legislators consider measures to reduce gun deaths, the NRA and its tentacle groups assign them failing grades and label them as anti-gun."

She then focused on the Buckeye Firearms Association for its "blasted criticism" of Bowling Green State University faculty members who had written to state Rep. Tim Brown asking that he not support legislation to allow concealed carry of firearms on Ohio college campuses. Brown voted for it.

The gun group used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain the list of faculty members who had written to Brown. It published their names and email addresses, singling out geology professor James Evans for special retribution by publishing his photo, too, because he called the NRA a "terrorist organization" in his email to Brown. McLaughlin described the rush of threatening emails to Evans from members of the firearms association. (Evans confirmed this in an interview Tuesday.)

After defending the faculty members, McLaughlin ended her editorial with a plea: "We've tried arming every citizen who is so inclined. It hasn't solved the problem. So let's look for other solutions, ones that reasonable gun owners can support. But that will mean responsible gun owners are first going to have to take back control of their national organization, which seems more concerned about the gun industry than the average gun owner."

Early the next morning, McLaughlin sent her editorial to Publisher Karmen Concannon, whose parents own the broadsheet, which publishes Monday through Saturday. McLaughlin also sent the editorial to three of her six staff writers. This is her practice in the small newsroom so that they can catch errors and offer criticism. McLaughlin described what happened next: That Tuesday evening, the publisher told her she had killed the editorial, with little explanation. On Wednesday, the six staff writers submitted a letter to Concannon, asking her to reconsider. She refused to read it. The next day, McLaughlin walked into the publisher's office, asking for an explanation, but Concannon said she didn't owe her one.

The following Monday morning, Concannon told McLaughlin she was fired and ordered her to surrender her keys before being escorted out of the building. She was allowed to return to the newsroom that evening to empty her desk. McLaughlin's termination letter stated that she was fired for insubordination — for doing what she always does, which is to share her editorial with staff writers. The publisher's explanation doesn't pass the straight-face test, which may be why Concannon has refused multiple requests for interviews...

You could reasonably ask, "Why should I care what happened at a small-town newspaper in Ohio?"

I suggest a different question: How often is this happening in our communities?

McLaughlin said that before she left the building, the publisher offered her a severance package. For her 31 years of service, the paper was willing to pay Jan Larson McLaughlin $5,000 — but only if she agreed not to talk about what had happened.

To the benefit of all of us, she declined.

http://www.creators.com/liberal/connie-schultz/editor-is-fired-but-not-silenced-over-the-nra.html
 
Can't say that I blame the NRA over this boob publishing lies and slander about them..they are certainly not a terrorist organization...no NRA members are forced to join and
can't 'take back' something they never had.....
This was a terrorist attack, not a mass shooting, and had nothing to do with the NRA or liberal gun control side issues, concealed carry permits, or the gun manufacturers...
Thats as stupid as calling 9/11 a terrible airplane accident.

Background check laws are already on the books and straw buying is already against the law, the legislature can propose anything they come up with that conforms to the Constitution, the NRA don't have a vote on anything.
and of course, law abiding gun owners had nothing to do San Bernardino
Media Liars that slander others that don't agree with their politics, deserve to be fired...

Or are you seriously implying that Publisher Karmen Concannon, or her
parents, that own the paper are being swayed or paid by the NRA ?

That is ludicrous on its face.....a ridiculous accusation without any proof.

Do you have a specific bone to pick with the NRA about this op, other than what your imagination conjures up...
 
Last edited:
This is how the NRA takes care of people who defy it. Hope you gun lovers are proud of how they worked to stifle free speech.

"Five days after the shootings in San Bernardino, California, Jan Larson McLaughlin sat down in her home office on her day off and wrote her weekly editorial for the Sentinel-Tribune, circulation 9,000, in Bowling Green, Ohio. McLaughlin has worked for the newspaper for 31 years, the past 2 1/2 as editor-in-chief. She usually writes her editorial in the newsroom, but this one required special care. She was taking on the National Rifle Association, and she was doing it in Ohio.

Her editorial began: "It is time for reasonable gun owners to take back control of the association that supposedly represents them. We as a nation are still mourning one mass shooting when the next occurs. Yet the NRA refuses to discuss any type of gun control, any form of background checks, any type of study that might lead to some answers. Instead, when legislators consider measures to reduce gun deaths, the NRA and its tentacle groups assign them failing grades and label them as anti-gun."

She then focused on the Buckeye Firearms Association for its "blasted criticism" of Bowling Green State University faculty members who had written to state Rep. Tim Brown asking that he not support legislation to allow concealed carry of firearms on Ohio college campuses. Brown voted for it.

The gun group used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain the list of faculty members who had written to Brown. It published their names and email addresses, singling out geology professor James Evans for special retribution by publishing his photo, too, because he called the NRA a "terrorist organization" in his email to Brown. McLaughlin described the rush of threatening emails to Evans from members of the firearms association. (Evans confirmed this in an interview Tuesday.)

After defending the faculty members, McLaughlin ended her editorial with a plea: "We've tried arming every citizen who is so inclined. It hasn't solved the problem. So let's look for other solutions, ones that reasonable gun owners can support. But that will mean responsible gun owners are first going to have to take back control of their national organization, which seems more concerned about the gun industry than the average gun owner."

Early the next morning, McLaughlin sent her editorial to Publisher Karmen Concannon, whose parents own the broadsheet, which publishes Monday through Saturday. McLaughlin also sent the editorial to three of her six staff writers. This is her practice in the small newsroom so that they can catch errors and offer criticism. McLaughlin described what happened next: That Tuesday evening, the publisher told her she had killed the editorial, with little explanation. On Wednesday, the six staff writers submitted a letter to Concannon, asking her to reconsider. She refused to read it. The next day, McLaughlin walked into the publisher's office, asking for an explanation, but Concannon said she didn't owe her one.

The following Monday morning, Concannon told McLaughlin she was fired and ordered her to surrender her keys before being escorted out of the building. She was allowed to return to the newsroom that evening to empty her desk. McLaughlin's termination letter stated that she was fired for insubordination — for doing what she always does, which is to share her editorial with staff writers. The publisher's explanation doesn't pass the straight-face test, which may be why Concannon has refused multiple requests for interviews...

You could reasonably ask, "Why should I care what happened at a small-town newspaper in Ohio?"

I suggest a different question: How often is this happening in our communities?

McLaughlin said that before she left the building, the publisher offered her a severance package. For her 31 years of service, the paper was willing to pay Jan Larson McLaughlin $5,000 — but only if she agreed not to talk about what had happened.

To the benefit of all of us, she declined.

http://www.creators.com/liberal/connie-schultz/editor-is-fired-but-not-silenced-over-the-nra.html

So what? She got fired for her beliefs. You love when people on the right are fired for their beliefs when they disagree with you. Now she can go write her lies someplace else.

Only you and this dumb twat would say and believe something like "we have tried to arm everyone and that hasn't worked".

Where do you dipshits get this bullshit from?

Come on have the ovaries to say you want guns banned. Why can't you you chickenshit.

I wish we would reduce violence period. I am less concerned with the method. I a sure as a terrorist is cutting off your head, your last fleeting thought will be "at least it wasn't a gun"
 
Poor KKKhristiefan doesn't have the ovaries to tell us how she would stop gun violence. But she will throw temper tantrums and use the dog whistle "gun lovers"
 
Can't say that I blame the NRA over this boob publishing lies and slander about them..they are certainly not a terrorist organization...no NRA members are forced to join and
can't 'take back' something they never had.....
This was a terrorist attack, not a mass shooting, and had nothing to do with the NRA or liberal gun control side issues, concealed carry permits, or the gun manufacturers...
Thats as stupid as calling 9/11 a terrible airplane accident.

Background check laws are already on the books and straw buying is already against the law, the legislature can propose anything they come up with that conforms to the Constitution, the NRA don't have a vote on anything. ...and of course, law abiding gun owners had nothing to do San Bernardino
Media Liars that slander others that don't agree with their politics, deserve to be fired...

Or are you seriously implying that Publisher Karmen Concannon, or her parents, that own the paper are being swayed or paid by the NRA ?

That is ludicrous on its face.....a ridiculous accusation without any proof.

Do you have a specific bone to pick with the NRA about this op, other than what your imagination conjures up...

What specific lies and slander did she write?

Opponents of gun control often talk about President Obama wanting to take guns away from lawful owners, and although he has never proposed to do that, many gun owners continue to believe it.

Also

The gun lobby has also become more unyielding in recent years. The N.R.A. has hardened its opposition to expanded background checks, for example, and after years in which the group gave subdued responses to mass shootings, after the Newtown, Connecticut school shooting, Wayne LaPierre, the N.R.A.’s executive vice president, famously declared that school employees should have been armed, because “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.”

I guess you didn't read this part about about the NRA: The gun group used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain the list of faculty members who had written to Brown. It published their names and email addresses, singling out geology professor James Evans for special retribution by publishing his photo, too, because he called the NRA a "terrorist organization" in his email to Brown. McLaughlin described the rush of threatening emails to Evans from members of the firearms association. (Evans confirmed this in an interview Tuesday.)

Again I'm referencing free speech and the author's editorial, obviously her opinion.Do you think the paper was afraid to publish an opinion that may have dissented from the editor's opinion?There must be something going on with the NRA and Concannon or her parents that made them so fearful. She could have responded to public questions about the firing.

What a shabby way to treat an employee of over 30 years. Shame on them.
 
What specific lies and slander did she write?

Opponents of gun control often talk about President Obama wanting to take guns away from lawful owners, and although he has never proposed to do that, many gun owners continue to believe it.

Also

The gun lobby has also become more unyielding in recent years. The N.R.A. has hardened its opposition to expanded background checks, for example, and after years in which the group gave subdued responses to mass shootings, after the Newtown, Connecticut school shooting, Wayne LaPierre, the N.R.A.’s executive vice president, famously declared that school employees should have been armed, because “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.”

I guess you didn't read this part about about the NRA: The gun group used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain the list of faculty members who had written to Brown. It published their names and email addresses, singling out geology professor James Evans for special retribution by publishing his photo, too, because he called the NRA a "terrorist organization" in his email to Brown. McLaughlin described the rush of threatening emails to Evans from members of the firearms association. (Evans confirmed this in an interview Tuesday.)

Again I'm referencing free speech and the author's editorial, obviously her opinion.Do you think the paper was afraid to publish an opinion that may have dissented from the editor's opinion?There must be something going on with the NRA and Concannon or her parents that made them so fearful. She could have responded to public questions about the firing.

What a shabby way to treat an employee of over 30 years. Shame on them.

Would you be starting this thread if the editorialist were fired for opposition to queer marriage? Absolutely not. More selective faux indignation by KKKhristiefan
 
I answered on the other thread. Now show me what you've got besides bleating conspiracy theories.

You just posted an article that called the NRA terrorists, tried to pass off a
terrorist attack as a 'mass shooting', said gun owners should take over
the NRA...lied that they are against background checks and studies on 'something'?
Implied the Calif. terrorist attack had something to do with concealed carry?
then indirectly blamed the NRA because her employers fired her, etc....

and you accuse others of conspiracy theories ?

LMAO.....know why....cuse its so damn funny....
 
You just posted an article that called the NRA terrorists, tried to pass off a
terrorist attack as a 'mass shooting', said gun owners should take over
the NRA...lied that they are against background checks and studies on 'something'?
Implied the Calif. terrorist attack had something to do with concealed carry?
then indirectly blamed the NRA because her employers fired her, etc....

and you accuse others of conspiracy theories ?

LMAO.....know why....cuse its so damn funny....

You're hopeless. It's like we read two different articles.
 
There you go again, false equivalence. Why do you expect me to support right-wing positions?


I don't want you to support right wing positions....I want to support the Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights and not try to make up rights the never were nor
infringe on rights that the gov. was specifically ordered not to.....
IN other words, don't try to re-write what was settled law 225 years ago....

And it seems, being a left winger, you can't even do those simple things....
 
What specific lies and slander did she write?

Opponents of gun control often talk about President Obama wanting to take guns away from lawful owners, and although he has never proposed to do that, many gun owners continue to believe it.

Also

The gun lobby has also become more unyielding in recent years. The N.R.A. has hardened its opposition to expanded background checks, for example, and after years in which the group gave subdued responses to mass shootings, after the Newtown, Connecticut school shooting, Wayne LaPierre, the N.R.A.’s executive vice president, famously declared that school employees should have been armed, because “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.”

I guess you didn't read this part about about the NRA: The gun group used the Freedom of Information Act to obtain the list of faculty members who had written to Brown. It published their names and email addresses, singling out geology professor James Evans for special retribution by publishing his photo, too, because he called the NRA a "terrorist organization" in his email to Brown. McLaughlin described the rush of threatening emails to Evans from members of the firearms association. (Evans confirmed this in an interview Tuesday.)

Read that part and agree that Evans earned his getting a special mention..for slandering the NRA as a terrorist group......(Funny he didn't add racist and bigots and Islamophobic)


Again I'm referencing free speech and the author's editorial, obviously her opinion.Do you think the paper was afraid to publish an opinion that may have dissented from the editor's opinion?There must be something going on with the NRA and Concannon or her parents that made them so fearful. She could have responded to public questions about the firing.

What a shabby way to treat an employee of over 30 years. Shame on them.

That was nothing to do with the NRA.....
Now the lies..

That the San Bernardino affair was a mass shooting and not a terrorist attack...it really can't be both because we do differentiate between the two.

That the NRA is against background checks....is made up of other than responsible gun owners

That the NRA refuses to discuss any type of gun control

That the NRA labels as 'anti-gun' any legislator that consider measures to reduce gun deaths

That terrorism is somehow linked to concealed carry laws

That the NRA is more concerned about the gun industry than the average gun owner.

Haven't seen the actual article so I can only go by what the op says ....
 
You just posted an article that called the NRA terrorists, tried to pass off a
terrorist attack as a 'mass shooting', said gun owners should take over
the NRA...lied that they are against background checks and studies on 'something'?
Implied the Calif. terrorist attack had something to do with concealed carry?
then indirectly blamed the NRA because her employers fired her, etc....

and you accuse others of conspiracy theories ?

LMAO.....know why....cuse its so damn funny....

You're hopeless. It's like we read two different articles.

So......show me, where did I go wrong ?......I'll understand if you don't.
 
There you go again, false equivalence. Why do you expect me to support right-wing positions?

You can't be this dense. I am not suggesting you support right wing positions you dolt. I am asking you to be consistent.

So is your issue that a journalist was fired for holding an unpopular position or that it was about guns?

Do you really not get the difference? Wait, don't answer. You don't get the difference. Your post proves my point.

You should be on bended knee thanking God that you can breathe without having to think about it
 
Guns, gays and abortion. The issues that epitomizes proles. If these are the issues that are important to you congratulations, you're one of the sheep and the wolves of Wall Street you enable are laughing their asses off at you behind your backs.
 
Back
Top