Economics: Liberal style

[Cancel 2018. 3]

You bring him up all of the time w/ me.

And I bumped the other thread; it's silly I had to do that. Now, spin away & tell me how your post doesn't say what it clearly says.

LOL

come on onceler....you're getting sad....i normally enjoy our little mindless spats, but you're getting unhinged....come back to reality...i refuse to make fun of mentally disabled people

 

[Onceler]

come on onceler....you're getting sad....i normally enjoy our little mindless spats, but you're getting unhinged....come back to reality...i refuse to make fun of mentally disabled people

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

i know you're confused onceler...i'm trying to help

 

[Bfgrn]

look at that stupid chart you posted. the title should read "bang" for the buck

Your idiot sources aren't even smart enough to get their cliches correct

So what are you saying, misspelling is a sign of a stupid fuck or dumbfuck?

I don't see what you're defending here. LOL MY GOD , you are dense.

What exatcly makes the context any better? You are an economic midget. Seriously, you ignored my post about FICA and employers.

CITE the god damn economitsts words if you want respect!

You quote Nancy as if we're supposed to accpet her word. Guess what? It's her words that are in question!

No wonder you're a warmer. You can't keep your sources straight

you can't do the math so you cite some dipshit who feeds tyou propaganda.

It's just like the global warmers

 

[Canceled.LTroll.2]

Here's one Article: Food stamp fraud, waste estimated to cost $1 billion

Here's another

If you really were concerned you'd do your own google and see just how wide spread waste and fraud is.

I did not "just call it "lame and stupid" I said "Food stamps don't stimulate anything when balaced against the cost for the program". I called your logic lame and stupid.

The liar exposed....

 

[Canceled.LTroll.2]

Bump