Durham investigation......

PostmodernProphet

PostmodernProphet

fully immersed in faith..
'Jim – it’s Michael Sussmann. I have something time-sensitive (and sensitive) I need to discuss. Do you have availability for a short meeting tomorrow?' the text provided by Durham reads.

'I’m coming on my own – not on behalf of a client or company – want to help the Bureau. Thanks.'
Click to expand...

written proof that Clinton campaign lied to the FBI and sent us down the path of wasting years investigating the fictional Russian collusion scam instead of dealing with America's problems.......

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10689769/John-Durham-releases-damning-text-message-proving-Clinton-lawyer-Michael-Sussman-lied-FBI.html
 
Uh huh. Not exactly an indictment against Hillary Clinton. Actually, the interesting thing about this "brazen" search for third party data is that it might have discovered, though apparently did not, that at the very time he was primarying for the GOP nomination Trump also was negotiating to build a hotel in, well, Moscow.
 
This thread....

02umGQ.gif


Typical.
 
Phantasmal said:
[FONT="]“Update: Charlie Savage noted to me, persuasively, that the statute of limitation has expired on charging Sussmann with lying on September 18. I still would not be surprised if Durham attempted to fix this error by superseding, perhaps by adopting “on or about” language. But if Durham can’t include September 18 in his indictment, he may have a real problem.”[/FONT][/COLOR][URL="https://www.emptywheel.net/2022/04/06/john-durham-is-likely-to-supersede-the-michael-sussmann-indictment/"]

https://www.emptywheel.net/2022/04/06/john-durham-is-likely-to-supersede-the-michael-sussmann-indictment/[/URL]
Click to expand...


“On or about” won’t work if it relates to a given date that is outside the statute.
 
Phantasmal said:
[FONT="]“Update: Charlie Savage noted to me, persuasively, that the statute of limitation has expired on charging Sussmann with lying on September 18. I still would not be surprised if Durham attempted to fix this error by superseding, perhaps by adopting “on or about” language. But if Durham can’t include September 18 in his indictment, he may have a real problem.”[/FONT][/COLOR][URL="https://www.emptywheel.net/2022/04/06/john-durham-is-likely-to-supersede-the-michael-sussmann-indictment/"]

https://www.emptywheel.net/2022/04/06/john-durham-is-likely-to-supersede-the-michael-sussmann-indictment/[/URL]
Click to expand...


sweet......dirty politics ignored because it was ignored.....the statute of limitations should be extended every time the demmycrats in the House used the lie to impeach Trump......
 
martin said:
Uh huh. Not exactly an indictment against Hillary Clinton. Actually, the interesting thing about this "brazen" search for third party data is that it might have discovered, though apparently did not, that at the very time he was primarying for the GOP nomination Trump also was negotiating to build a hotel in, well, Moscow.
Click to expand...
and? so what? Hillary put out a Tweet about Trump 'connections' to alpha bank
wonder where she got that info? :rolleyes:
 
Gini Thomas was in life springs cult in the 1980s and it took months to deprogram her out of that cult
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top