DOJ Allowing Illegal Protests Outside SCOTUS Justices Homes Despite Federal Law

Earl

Well-known member
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT Published June 21, 2022 4:27pm EDT
DOJ allowing illegal protests outside SCOTUS justices' homes despite federal law, former officials say
Attorney General Merrick Garland has stated the DOJ is working to keep justices safe from harm

By Timothy H.J. Nerozzi | Fox News


Sen. Johnson rips Democrats, media over protests at Supreme Court justices' homes: 'Complete double standard'
Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson joined 'The Faulkner Focus' to discuss the media's complicity in protesters targeting the homes of Supreme Court justices.



The Department of Justice has failed to enforce a federal statute which prohibits protests, pickets, and other forms of intimidation outside the home of judges.

It is illegal under federal law to attempt to influence a judge's ruling or interfere with the discharge of their duty. However, the Department of Justice has thus far refused to interfere with demonstrators outside the homes of several Supreme Court justices, including Justices Clarence Thomas, Amy Coney Barrett, and Brett Kavanaugh. While the DOJ has provided security at the justices' homes, they have allowed protests and picketing to continue unimpeded.

John Daukas, retired Acting Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, told Fox News that the ongoing pressure from activists for an as-of-yet unreleased decision is a clear violation of federal law.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-allows-illegal-protests-scotus-justices-homes-federal-law
 
A/G Garland is not enforcing federal law.

He will be impeached after the November, red tsunami in Congress
 
Following the leaked Supreme Court opinion in the highly anticipated Dobbs case that looks to overturn Roe v. Wade, pro-abortion radicals have begun targeting Supreme Court justices’ homes with protests and pro-life groups with violence.

Protesters have been targeting the homes of the conservative Supreme Court justices, hoping to persuade them to change their opinion on the Dobbs case, leaving Roe v. Wade and its made-up constitutional “right to abortion” intact.

Starting on Mother’s Day, radicals also began attacking pro-life organizations, including Wisconsin Family Action, one of Family Policy Alliance’s allied state groups. Early Sunday morning, members of a radical group threw a firebomb into the office of Wisconsin Family Action, leaving behind this threatening messaging: If abortions aren’t safe, then you aren’t either. The radical group claiming responsibility for the attack promises more violence across the country targeted at pro-life organizations.
https://familypolicyalliance.com/iss...with-violence/
 
The partisan composition of state legislatures refers to which political party holds the majority of seats in the State Senate and State House. Altogether, there are 1,972 state senators and 5,411 state representatives.

The breakdown of chamber control after the November 2021 election is as follows:

Democratic Party 36 chambers
Republican Party 62 chambers[1]
Democratic Party Republican Party One chamber with power sharing between the parties



It appears that lots of states will be revisiting Roe vs. Wade.


Overturning Roe is progress. Same sex marriage, next.
 
And the right has nothing to say about numerous death threats to Dr Fauci, Psaki, Georgia election officials and even local volunteers who work at the polls, move on
 
And the right has nothing to say about numerous death threats to Dr Fauci, Psaki, Georgia election officials and even local volunteers who work at the polls, move on


What an asinine false equivalency.

Please show us all the threatening protestors outside of Fauci's, Psaki's, Georgie elections official's etc. HOMES.
 
Back
Top