Do You Have Evidence Of Trump-Russia Collusion Or Not?

Stretch

New member
Gowdy Grills Brennan: Do You Have Evidence Of Trump-Russia Collusion Or Not?; Brennan: "I Don't Do Evidence"

Rep. Trey Gowdy grills former CIA director John Brennan at a House Intelligence Committee meeting Tuesday morning on Russia's interference in the 2016 election. Gowdy repeatedly presses Brennan for some kind of hard evidence, or even the admission that such evidence exists, that President Trump or his campaign were involved with the Russian attempt to influence the election.

Brennan repeatedly dodged, saying: "As I said Mr. Gowdy, I don't do evidence."

"I appreciate that you don't do evidence, Director Brennan. Unfortunately, that's what I do," Gowdy fired back. "That's the word we use, you use the word assessment, you use the word tradecraft. I use the word evidence. And the good news for me is lots of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle use the word evidence, too. One of my colleagues said there is more than circumstantial evidence of collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign."

Eventually Brennan replied: "I don't know whether or not such collusion -- and that's your term, such collusion existed. I don't know. But I know that there was a sufficient basis of information and intelligence that required further investigation by the bureau to determine whether or not U.S. persons were actively conspiring, colluding with Russian officials."


video and article continued at http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...lusion_or_not_brennan_i_dont_do_evidence.html
 
lol. So when the CIA investigates you they dont do evidence :P How do they determine who to investigate or where to send their people?
 
The evidence is classified...
The hearing was public...
Gowdy knows ...
He is putting on a show.
All Brennan would have had to say was that he couldn't comment on that in an open hearing(which I even heard some of the jackass politicians say, as in, "I know you can't comment on this in an open hearing Mr. Brennan, but..."). The only problem with this is, the 6pm news would have immediately led off with "BRENNAN SAYS THERE'S EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION!(He just can't talk about it:o)"
 
Brennan is a hack. They all can put out non-classifed assessments blaming the Russian for everything under the sun
but they can't even confirm if a sitting POTUS was in collusion.

It paralyzes politics,and these high on their horse assh*les are quite willing to play that card when it suits them to protect their turf (IC) but not the country as a whole
 
Did he say it was classified?

Has anyone said they have classified evidence of collusion?

ANSWER: no

CONCLUSION: Bukkkle is a liar
Lol, they can't say, it's classified, we don't know if they do or don't. We just have to wait and see.
 
I'll go out on a limb and say Brennen was saying he had no evidence lol.

Without giving the appearance he was saying he had no evidence.
 
They can't say it is classified? Really?

:palm:

What has happened to you?
No, it's classified, they cannot talk about classified information. Why is this difficult for you to understand?
They can not confirm or deny classified information. It's the law.
 
No, it's classified, they cannot talk about classified information. Why is this difficult for you to understand?
They can not confirm or deny classified information. It's the law.

Sorry, I missed the comma in your sentence "Lol, they can't say, it's classified,...". :palm:

Anyhoo, has he actually said anything is classified and he can't bring it up?
 
I'll go out on a limb and say Brennen was saying he had no evidence lol.

Without giving the appearance he was saying he had no evidence.
I am soo tired of these headgames.
all they really care about -much like J Edgar Hoover did -is protecting their own turf
 
No, it's classified, they cannot talk about classified information. Why is this difficult for you to understand?
They can not confirm or deny classified information. It's the law.

The evidence is there, but it hasn't been leaked. And this, despite the fact there are enemies of Trump within the IC who are aware of it.

You really believe that?
 
Sorry, I missed the comma in your sentence "Lol, they can't say, it's classified,". :palm:

Anyhoo, has he actually said anything is classified and he can't bring it up?
Yes, in his testimony, Gowdy tried to trick him, but Brennan handled it well.
 
I'll go out on a limb and say Brennen was saying he had no evidence lol.

Without giving the appearance he was saying he had no evidence.
I wouldn't expect any different from you, but there is no indication one way or the other. Just wishful thinking on your part.
 
Now we know that collusion is not a crime (except in antitrust cases). So Mueller is tasked with finding a non-crime.

Not to mention asking officials to clear a non-crime can't be obstruction of justice.

No wonder you people lose so many elections.
 
Back
Top