Did the Russian theory get Tomahawked?

17n Intelligence agencies -but do you think Clapper (DNI) who wrote the report actually asked each one?

Yaya. we've all heard this month after month ad nauseum.

Hillary Clinton is a warhark -she's gone after Putin before for putting down demonstrations,
and she said the other day she would take out ALL AIRFIELDS in Syria..
That would in effect cause an air war with Russia over Syria.

Putin knows she's a warhawk- her campaign was all "get tough on Putin unlike Obama did"
and she would never consider anything but more mindless ratcheting up of Cold War 2.0.

Trump was talking about a "Russian reset" during the campaign but the bellicose warmonger of McCain and Graham
along with the Dem's -have made that increasingly politically difficult if not impossible.

Tillerson is going to Moscow next week -you can be sure everybody will be looking to see if he's "tough"

Putin wanted a Russian reset with Trump -same as Obama did -but Obama offered nothing to reset.
I'm sure Trump won't even bother..the Deep State and various warhawks have made that all but impossible

Here is how your Orange Clown Promotes the Kremlin's Interests and Weakens American Interests:


Trump Picks Fights with US Allies: Germany, NATO, EU, Britain etc.
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2...-fights-us-allies-germany-nato-eu-britain-etc

Allies Fear Trump Is Eroding America’s Moral Authority


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/10/...rica-a-toned-down-voice-for-human-rights.html

Trump, Tillerson clash with NATO allies at America's risk

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...erson-clash-with-nato-allies-at-americas-risk

‘This was the worst call by far’: Trump badgered, bragged and abruptly ended phone call with Australian leader

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...0e57e57e05d_story.html?utm_term=.2f90c28b9853
 
^ ya ya. you can't even compose your own thoughts, so you c/p others.

It's the same shopworn crap NYTimes talking about US "moral authority" - that's neocon code words
for spreading democracy at the barrel of a gun.

The same conflation of the "7 states " to a Muslim ban
and the same dissing of NATO -when Trump was simply calling for NATO states to meet the membership dues.

Same old hackneyed bullshit you revel in..

All I care about is not getting dragged into neocon war of choice that Hillary wanted, and STILL THIS WEEK
was willing to do in Syria
 
Yours are not the thoughts of a sophisticated mind.

Trump admin told Russia where we were bombing beforehand, and the damage caused was cosmetic. Merely enough to allow Drumpf supporters to thump their chests like belligerent gorillas.

We told the Russians because it was a responsible thing to do: we don't need a war with Russia.

And it's not just Trump supporters who approved of the attack.
 
983923_1729712493722065_6789443019063782796_n.jpg
 
The investigations are just beginning...

The investigations will lead to Obama and Susan Rice. Do liberals and the Party of the Jackass ever grow tired of being wrong? That was a rhetorical question whose answer is an obvious and resounding NO.
 
Yours are not the thoughts of a sophisticated mind.

Yours are the thoughts of an ignorant mind.

Trump admin told Russia where we were bombing beforehand, and the damage caused was cosmetic. Merely enough to allow Drumpf supporters to thump their chests like belligerent gorillas.

Another false and patently stupid claim. I guess you're calling Hitlery a gorilla that thumps her chest as well.

Dunce.
 
Wait, you actually thought that there was a theory that the Kremlin would be cabling orders to the White House to follow?

Allow me to dispel your naivete, and explain how the world works.

The Kremlin viewed the hapless Drumpf as their preferred candidate. Not because they could cable orders to him to follow. That is not me saying that. That is the conclusion of 16 American intelligence agencies.

The Kremlin correctly surmised that Drumpf would be too incompetent and foolish toeffectively protect and advance American interests globally, and by extension he would either be to weak or too foolish to effectively provide a counter weight to Kremlin regional and global interests.

More leftist lunacy; you're quite FULL of it. :rofl2:
 
Wishful thinking.
Nixon-6%5Bl%5D.jpg


The IC has been leaking like a sieve for months---if there was anything to it we probably would have known it by now.

Susan Rice was very likely intensely fishing for dirt and came up empty. Trump won because he ran a better campaign that took into consideration the electoral college. He would be kind of goofy to involve the Russians in a national election when the eRepublicans couldn't even affect an outcome in the primaries---after spending untold millions.

Russians...lol? It's far-fetched. It's like some Alex Jones would come up with.

Yea, he would be goofy to do that, he played along, they didn't him screwing it up any more than he already has........

You can think/hope it is all past now, but next lil piece will be right back on the front page..... Just how it is........
 
Yours are not the thoughts of a sophisticated mind.

Trump admin told Russia where we were bombing beforehand, and the damage caused was cosmetic. Merely enough to allow Drumpf supporters to thump their chests like belligerent gorillas.

Isn't that one of his big complaints, telling the enemy in advance?? Hill he gave them times & date..:rofl2:........................:whoa:
 
A week ago they were telling us we need to be buddies w/ putin, now we need to flex muscles against him they say.LMAO!!
 
not "cosmetic damage"
Here is a FOX link -but it links to the highly regarded Syrian Observatory for Human Rights ( British group)

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/0...te-photos-show-major-damage-to-airfields.html
satellite images released Friday of the Syrian air base that was pounded with 59 U.S. Tomahawk missiles show large-scale destruction to airfields, planes and fueling facilities allegedly used by the Assad regime to mount chemical weapons attacks.

However, the London-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported that Syrian warplanes were able to take off from the base and carry out airstrikes in the countryside near Homs.

Shayrat air base was "almost completely destroyed" by the barrage of 1,000-pound warheads launched from the Eastern Mediterranean Sea early Friday, according to a human rights group in the country.

U.S. intelligence sources told Fox News they believe with "high confidence" that a deadly gas attack on Syrian civilians was carried out by government aircraft at Shayrat air base, southeast of Homs.

"Initial indications are that this strike has severely damaged or destroyed Syrian aircraft and support infrastructure and equipment at Shayrat Airfield."

- Capt. Jeff Davis, a Pentagon spokesman

The Britain-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said the missile attack damaged over a dozen hangars, a fuel depot and an air defense base.

At least seven Syrian soldiers were killed and nine wounded in the airstrike, the country's military said.

The governor of Homs province said he did not believe the strikes caused a large number of "human casualties." A Syrian official the attack caused deaths and a fire, but did not elaborate.

++

here is the DoD report (photos) and description
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-satellite-images-Syrian-airfield-hit-US.html
Assad's base in ruins: Dramatic satellite photos reveal how airfield pounded with 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles is 'almost completely destroyed' after punishment for deadly chemical weapon attack

New images from the DoD show how badly the al-Shayrat military airfield was damaged in Thursday's strike
The satellite pictures show damaged and destroyed aircraft shelters and massive blast marks on the ground

++

the shelters/hangers were concrete reinforced -underground photos at this link
Funny how a"completely destroyed base was usable the next day.

Are you a liar, idiot or both?
 
Funny how a"completely destroyed base was usable the next day.

Are you a liar, idiot or both?

According to Mattis, it destroyed 20% of Syrian air capability. Which is every bit as good as 'totally destroying' an air base.

Everything the IC says is gospel, right lol?
 
No, it did not change the evidence.

What evidence is that?

I noticed one of the main outlets [Rueters maybe] persists in calling it 'Trump's Russian scandal' even though no one knows if anything scandalous has happened.

I think that's scandalous journalism.
 
Back
Top