Did he stand his ground, too?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
G

Guns Guns Guns

Guest
A former Indian Army officer wanted in a 1996 killing in his native country killed his wife and two of their children in their California home Saturday before apparently taking his own life, authorities said.

Avtar Singh called Selma police at around 6:15 a.m. and told them that he had just killed four people, Fresno County Sheriff's Deputy Chris Curtice said.

Selma police asked for assistance from the Fresno County Sheriff's Office because Singh was known to have a military background and was wanted by authorities in India for allegedly killing a human rights lawyer in 1996 in the disputed Kashmir region, Curtice said.

When a sheriff's SWAT team entered the home they found the bodies of Singh, a woman believed to be his wife and two children, ages 3 and 15, Curtice said. All four appeared to have died from gunshot wounds.

A 17-year-old boy also found in the home was suffering from severe head trauma and was "barely alive," Curtice said.

The teen was taken to a hospital where he underwent surgery. His condition wasn't known.

Singh fled to the United States after he was accused of killing lawyer Jaleel Andrabi in Indian-controlled Kashmir's main city, Srinagar.

Andrabi disappeared in March 1996 at the height of an anti-India uprising, and his body was recovered 19 days later in a local river. He had been shot in the head and his eyes gouged out.

Singh, 47, was arrested by Selma police in February 2011 when his wife reported that he had choked her, Selma Police Chief Myron Dyck said shortly after that arrest. After Singh was taken into custody, police discovered that he was being sought in India.

Several days later, India requested that the United States arrest and extradite Singh. It wasn't clear on Saturday why Singh had remained free since the request.




http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57450026/ex-indian-army-officer-kills-family-self-in-calif/
 
Blame Obama and his failed immigration policies

Dyck said at the time that he could not keep Singh in custody on the murder charge without a warrant from international authorities.

Several days later, India requested that the United States arrest and extradite Singh. It wasn't clear on Saturday why Singh had remained free since the request.
 
Was Obama in office when Singh fled here from India, RacistX?

No that would have been Bubba, but he was too busy getting his blowjobs from Monicia. Obama is currently in the office now, once an illegal is caught, he should have been held for deportation, instead due to Obama's his failure as a human, a mother and her two children are dead because of him.
 
No that would have been Bubba, but he was too busy getting his blowjobs from Monicia. Obama is currently in the office now, once an illegal is caught, he should have been held for deportation, instead due to Obama's his failure as a human, a mother and her two children are dead because of him.

"Obama is currently in the office now"?

So Obama made sure he had a gun, and helped him murder people?

LOL at your faux concern for the victims, RacistX. Were they Indian?
 
legion, do you know what a strawman is, or do you simply not even care?

:legion:

You are so retarded I had no choice but to .gif you.

Code:
:legion:
 
No that would have been Bubba, but he was too busy getting his blowjobs from Monicia. Obama is currently in the office now, once an illegal is caught, he should have been held for deportation, instead due to Obama's his failure as a human, a mother and her two children are dead because of him.

If you recall Billy was on the phone to some official in Florida while receiving a BJ according to Monica who was under his desk at the time. That's proof he was able to multi-task so getting a BJ wouldn't have interfered with him dealing with immigrants.

Let's give him credit. How many people could carry on a phone conversation while receiving a BJ? At the very least I would imagine the tone of his voice would rise.
 
LOL.

Notice that RacistX doesn't question how an accused killer and fugitive from justice obtained a gun?
 
webways concern is only because the killer is not american.

RacistX wanted to attack Obama.

bringing the 2nd Amendment or guns in to is is nothing more than strawman arguments.

LOL. What did Singh use to kill and maim his victims?

Was Singh an American citizen when he obtained the weapons he used?

If not, explain how the Second Amendment (which I do not recall mentioning previously) applies, will you?
 
RacistX wanted to attack Obama.
i thought that was evident?


LOL. What did Singh use to kill and maim his victims?
he could have used anything. It was his wife and children, people who thought they could trust him. therefore, the weapon of choice is irrelevant.

Was Singh an American citizen when he obtained the weapons he used?

If not, explain how the Second Amendment (which I do not recall mentioning previously) applies, will you?
The 2nd Amendment states that the right shall not be infringed. This is nothing more than a limitation put upon the government to never infringe on the human right of tools for self defense.
 
i thought that was evident?

So you "thought that was evident", but said this instead?

webways concern is only because the killer is not american.


he could have used anything. It was his wife and children, people who thought they could trust him. therefore, the weapon of choice is irrelevant.

But he didn't use "anything", did he? Explain how he could have used lawn furniture to maim and kill. Or loaves of bread.

The 2nd Amendment states that the right shall not be infringed. This is nothing more than a limitation put upon the government to never infringe on the human right of tools for self defense.

So why'd you bring it up? I didn't.
 
So you "thought that was evident", but said this instead?
If you needed me to re-iterate an already evident position of webway, perhaps you're not as astute as I thought.

But he didn't use "anything", did he? Explain how he could have used lawn furniture to maim and kill. Or loaves of bread.
he could have bashed in brains with a deck chair or a bench. He could have jammed balls of bread in their mouths to choke them. Anyone intent on inflicting lethal damage to another living being becomes very inventive with what they find around them.

So why'd you bring it up? I didn't.
doesn't the mention of guns always bring up the 2nd Amendment? I just started early.
 
If you needed me to re-iterate an already evident position of webway, perhaps you're not as astute as I thought.

If you think completely changing RacistX's intention from "attacking Obama" to "not American" is reiteration, your opinion of me is irrelevant. In fact, the worse it is, the better I seem.

he could have bashed in brains with a deck chair or a bench. He could have jammed balls of bread in their mouths to choke them. Anyone intent on inflicting lethal damage to another living being becomes very inventive with what they find around them.

But that's not what happened, is it?

doesn't the mention of guns always bring up the 2nd Amendment? I just started early.

LOL.

Was Singh a citizen when he obtained his gun, which he "happened to find around" him?
 
If you think completely changing RacistX's intention from "attacking Obama" to "not American" is reiteration, your opinion of me is irrelevant. In fact, the worse it is, the better I seem.
so webways MO is either attacking obama or attacking non whites? it can't be both?

But that's not what happened, is it?
doesn't matter, does it?

Was Singh a citizen when he obtained his gun, which he "happened to find around" him?
don't know, don't care, and it doesn't matter. the constitution isn't a list of rights afforded to Americans only. It's a list of limitations imposed upon the government.
 
so webways MO is either attacking obama or attacking non whites? it can't be both?

So now "not American" (which is what you said) = non-white?

doesn't matter, does it?

Then you keep replying because it doesn't matter?

don't know, don't care, and it doesn't matter.

Again?

the constitution isn't a list of rights afforded to Americans only. It's a list of limitations imposed upon the government.

Is that right?

Got any case law to substantiate that claim?

Let's see it.
 
Back
Top