Dems pitch national park on the moon

RockX

Banned
The bill from Reps. Donna Edwards (D-Md.) and Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Texas) would create the Apollo Lunar Landing Sites National Historical Park. The park would be comprised of all artifacts left on the surface of the moon from the Apollo 11 through 17 missions.

The bill says these sites need to be protected because of the anticipated increase in commercial moon landings in the future.

"As commercial enterprises and foreign nations acquire the ability to land on the Moon, it is necessary to protect the Apollo lunar landing sites for posterity," according to the text of the Apollo Lunar Landing Legacy Act, H.R. 2617.

Under the legislation, the park would be established no later than one year after the bill passes and would be run jointly by the Department of the Interior and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

The measure would allow the government to accept donations from companies and foreign governments to help manage the landing sites and "provide visitor services and administrative facilities within reasonable proximity to the Historical Park."

After one year, Interior and NASA would have to reach an agreement on how to manage the site, including how to monitor it, managing access to the sites and cataloguing the items in the park.

The government would also have to submit the Apollo 11 lunar landing site to the United Nations for designation as a World Heritage site.


Both Edwards and Bernice Johnson are members of the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee. Bernice Johnson is the panel's ranking member.

Edwards, the ranking member on the House Space Subcommittee, also proposed legislation on Monday to reauthorize NASA for three years. That bill, H.R. 2616, authorizes spending of $18.1 billion in 2014 for NASA, which rises to $18.9 billion in 2016.

Aside from boosting NASA's budget, the bill also sets as a goal a human mission to Mars and maintains a commitment to funding International Space Station operations through 2020.

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/309829-dems-propose-historical-park-on-the-moon

OBAMA+CARTOON,+LOONEY+LEFT+MOONBATS.jpg



:palm:

Meanwhile in the real world.....

NASA chief Charles Bolden says the space agency won't be sending astronauts to land on the moon any time soon, according to press reports.


http://news.yahoo.com/us-wont-lead-manned-moon-landings-nasa-chief-191835839.html
 
Um... but reading the bill - it says the park will be composed of artifacts on the surface of the moon. Basically, if other nations or companies go up there, we don't want them messing with the stuff we left behind.

It also says
Responsibilities
6 of the Administrator shall specifically include—
7 (1) ensuring proper monitoring of the Apollo
8 lunar landing sites;
9 (2) managing access to the sites, including
10 through coordination with other spacefaring nations
11 and entities; and
12 (3) in conjunction with the Director of the
13 Smithsonian Institution, ensuring an accurate cata
14loguing of items in the Historical Park.

Let me know what I'm reading wrong.

This article says:
http://reason.com/24-7/2013/07/09/dems-propose-national-park-on-the-moon

Two House Democrats have proposed legislation that would establish a national historical park on the surface of the moon to mark where the Apollo missions landed between 1969 and 1972.

The bill from Reps. Donna Edwards (D-Md.) and Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Texas) would create the Apollo Lunar Landing Sites National Historical Park. The park would be comprised of all artifacts left on the surface of the moon from the Apollo 11 through 17 missions.

The bill says these sites need to be protected because of the anticipated increase in commercial moon landings in the future.

While I have no idea how we're going to enforce the park, or if we have the right to claim part of the moon as a park, it does sound like we're talking about a site on the moon.

No, we're not putting park rangers up there and setting up a visitor schedule. But we want to preserve our artifacts.

Should this be our number 1 priority? No. But it beats yet another vote on reversing ACA or another vote on abortion restrictions.
 
I don't care if we're laying claim to the land. That's not meaning we're going to have a park up there anytime soon, nor does it fund anything. I posted a pdf of the bill.
 
I don't care if we're laying claim to the land. That's not meaning we're going to have a park up there anytime soon, nor does it fund anything. I posted a pdf of the bill.

I agree. No resources, not putting a parks building up there or anything like that.

But it is claiming a bit of the land.

MANIFEST DESTINY!! Let's send all the conservatives on this site up to colonize the moon before other countries do it! it's their patriotic duty, and we know how patriotic they say they are!
 
ROFL

Howey, whats wrong. Did your Mom kick you out again of the house?
Or is it because I pointed out again how stupid blacks democrats are for wanting to build a park on the fucking moon.

You think they would be more concerned with helping our own planet Earth. They should combine forces with their cohort Rep. Hank Johnson, to make sure Guam does not tip over.


Z




More of those right wing news organizations that reported the same thing.....

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-57593048-1/bill-proposes-turning-moon-sites-into-national-park/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...0/should-we-have-a-national-park-on-the-moon/

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/07/09/national-park-on-moon-proposed/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Or is it because I pointed out again how stupid blacks democrats are for wanting to build a park on the fucking moon.

a) they aren't building a park on the moon. The bill would say that a section of the moon -where our astronauts landed - is a park. They aren't building a single thing

b) You're showing how you're a racist again.
 
Back
Top