Dems Attack Own For Refusing to Blame Assad For Chemical Attack

[Granule]

Democratic Representative Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii has drawn sharp criticism from fellow Democrats for refusing to blame the Syrian government for a chemical weapons attack used to justify President Trump’s cruise missile strike on a Syrian airbase.

Gabbard indicated she was “skeptical” the Syrian government was responsible for the chemical weapons attack on the town of Khan Sheikhoun during an interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer.

https://www.infowars.com/dems-attack-own-for-refusing-to-blame-assad-for-chemical-attack/


Interesting...

 

[zymurgy]

her and Rand Paul get major credit for being cautious.

she is exactly right about Iraq as well. funny how quickly everyone forgets about the intelligence in their rush to to drop bombs

 

[anatta]

Gabbard is a voice of sanity -much like Rand Paul on interventionism

 

[Element-22-Cat]

LOL, of all the stories to cite from InfoWars now, the rather unsurprising infighting about getting involved militarily.

Since it's InfoWars shouldn't we be talking about how the Syrian attack was a false flag operation? And now I see it is all about pipelines!

 

[zymurgy]

LOL, of all the stories to cite from InfoWars now, the rather unsurprising infighting about getting involved militarily.

Since it's InfoWars shouldn't we be talking about how the Syrian attack was a false flag operation? And now I see it is all about pipelines!

I watched an interview with Wolf Blitzer on CNN critical of her position - is that MSM enough for you?

 

[Element-22-Cat]

I watched an interview with Wolf Blitzer on CNN critical of her position - is that MSM enough for you?

It's hardly interesting regardless who reports it. Go over the votes for the Iraq war, there was a lot of disagreement inside the dem party, with criticism from the warhawks. This is nothing new. The Reps have attacked their own as well, McCain has been constantly berating Rand Paul, not to mention a month ago he accused Paul of working for Putin. Nothing surprising, as they say politics makes strange bedfellows.

But what about Infowars claims about a false flag operation and it being about pipelines?

 

[zymurgy]

It's hardly interesting regardless who reports it. Go over the votes for the Iraq war, there was a lot of disagreement inside the dem party, with criticism from the warhawks. This is nothing new. The Reps have attacked their own as well, McCain has been constantly berating Rand Paul, not to mention a month ago he accused Paul of working for Putin. Nothing surprising, as they say politics makes strange bedfellows.

But what about Infowars claims about a false flag operation and it being about pipelines?

why the insistence to change the subject?

we attacked a country that posed no risk to us without congressional oversight - pointing out a different military action from long ago that did receive congressional approval is asinine - why are you doing that?

 

[Element-22-Cat]

why the insistence to change the subject?

I've already pointed out and said that it isn't very interesting and that it is nothing new. I gave examples of why it isn't particularly interesting and how it happens in the Republican party as well. You seem to ignore all that.

we attacked a country that posed no risk to us without congressional oversight - pointing out a different military action from long ago that did receive congressional approval is asinine - why are you doing that?

You lack the ability to reason the obvious, my pointing out a different military action was to demonstrate how such infighting is nothing new when it comes to such matters, they were fighting as to whether or not to give congressional approval. If you want to look at another more recent conflict, then look at Libya. The hawks all supported it but there were Democrats that were against it (such as Kucinich) who were marginalized and pushed out of the discussion. No congressional approval was given for that action and you could argue that it was an attack against a country that posed no risk to the US.

So really, this is just politics like usual, nothing interesting.

But hey, you seem hell bent on not discussing the more interesting things that Alex Jones is ranting about.

 

[zymurgy]

I've already pointed out and said that it isn't very interesting and that it is nothing new. I gave examples of why it isn't particularly interesting and how it happens in the Republican party as well. You seem to ignore all that.

So leave the thread. This isn’t about Alex Jones. If you find that topic interesting participate in a thread about it.

I do find it interesting that we no longer even question military force and empire building – and that is where my focus for this thread will remain.

You lack the ability to reason the obvious

Right. You seem to lack focus.

 

[Element-22-Cat]

So leave the thread. This isn’t about Alex Jones. If you find that topic interesting participate in a thread about it.

I do find it interesting that we no longer even question military force and empire building – and that is where my focus for this thread will remain.



Right. You seem to lack focus.

Well if you read the story you will find the focus is in fact on the idea of a false flag operation.

Gabbard tweeted: "Yes, I’m skeptical” of claim Assad regime is behind chemical weapons attack".

So it very much about the false flag story I mentioned that Alex Jones was selling. That Assad didn't attack his own civilians with sarin, that he is in some way being framed for it as an excuse to go to war against Syria. And Dems are attacking her for making that claim.

So let's discuss her claim. You can debate NOT continuing military action against Syria even if you believe Assad used Sarin again against his civilians. But if it is a false flag, well then any further action against Syria is a vile conspiracy to execute an illegitimate war.

So let's discuss Gabbard's claim, which is why other dems are attacking her. Like I said, it's nothing of interest otherwise.

 

[Getin the ring]

So leave the thread. This isn’t about Alex Jones. If you find that topic interesting participate in a thread about it.

I do find it interesting that we no longer even question military force and empire building – and that is where my focus for this thread will remain.



Right. You seem to lack focus.

what are you even talking about, there's little question Assad used Chemical weapons, on civilians no less.

 

[zymurgy]

what are you even talking about, there's little question Assad used Chemical weapons, on civilians no less.

and you know this because how exactly?

Iraq also had weapons of mass destruction - until that was proven false.

 

[tsuke]

It's hardly interesting regardless who reports it. Go over the votes for the Iraq war, there was a lot of disagreement inside the dem party, with criticism from the warhawks. This is nothing new. The Reps have attacked their own as well, McCain has been constantly berating Rand Paul, not to mention a month ago he accused Paul of working for Putin. Nothing surprising, as they say politics makes strange bedfellows.

But what about Infowars claims about a false flag operation and it being about pipelines?

im not convinced that assad did it. It looked like his side was winning. Newhoo at the end of the day all that matters is it gave us an excuse to fling missiles at someone right before Trump met with Xi so its all good

 

[Getin the ring]

and you know this because how exactly?

Iraq also had weapons of mass destruction - until that was proven false.

what are you, like 12?

We didn't go into Iraq to find WMD's, we went in to verify he didn't have them. Like the UN resolution ordered he verify. Do you read?

And who do you think used chemical weapons on Syrian civilians? Trump? Don't answer that, you're already so deep into it you don't matter.

International law, since WWI has been no chemical weapons on the battlefield. Until now the world had no one willing to enforce that. A very dangerous path.

So watch what happens when America shows strength, this is all going to come to an end soon. Kim Jung bunghole, Assad, the Iranian Mullahs, and anyone else who gets in the way is getting ready to meet their demise. Watch and learn. As History is written

 

[Element-22-Cat]

im not convinced that assad did it. It looked like his side was winning. Newhoo at the end of the day all that matters is it gave us an excuse to fling missiles at someone right before Trump met with Xi so its all good

It looks like his side was winning? It has been a long and brutal civil war, almost half the country is not under his control. Between the rebels and ISIS, he's not exactly sitting pretty even with the help of the Russians.

So if Assad didn't do it, who is framing him?

 

[domer76]

what are you even talking about, there's little question Assad used Chemical weapons, on civilians no less.

Good. You agree with those Dems criticizing her for the ignorant tweet.

 

[zymurgy]

what are you, like 12?

You consider that mature, or intelligent? It wasn’t and you are not.

We didn't go into Iraq to find WMD's, we went in to verify he didn't have them. Like the UN resolution ordered he verify. Do you read?

We went into Iraq to topple Saddam you fucking idiot. Every reason was a pretense for that – including the claim they violated no fly zones

By the way jackass - the multi national force that went to war in Iraq was not the UN – so was not in any way in charge of enforcing UN resolutions. You are a lying jackass. Maybe that form of idiocy worked with others, but you aren’t going to win debates with me lying through your teeth