Democrats don't want Obama job bill

Man....onecell is easily amused isn't he ?.....

Anyway......Yurt.....will you be surprised when they blame Bush for "Obama's Jobs Bill Failure"...????
I can't wait to see how they gonna do it..and which cable news network will break the story....CNN or MSNBC...
 
bravo said:
Man....onecell is easily amused isn't he ?.....

Anyway......Yurt.....will you be surprised when they blame Bush for "Obama's Jobs Bill Failure"...????
I can't wait to see how they gonna do it..and which cable news network will break the story....CNN or MSNBC...
Click to expand...

yeah, dunceler rarely debates issues, he would much rather focus on sniping

i agree, i'm waiting for someone to blame the republicans
 
Yurt said:
yeah, dunceler rarely debates issues, he would much rather focus on sniping

i agree, i'm waiting for someone to blame the republicans
Click to expand...

Agree......I wonder what chromosome hes missing to make him act the way he acts.....
 
bravo said:
Agree......I wonder what chromosome hes missing to make him act the way he acts.....
Click to expand...

It's always hysterical to watch two Righties stroking each other in another mastabatory ego boost-a-thon...for a bunch of homophobes, they sure seem to enjoy regularly jacking each other off.
 
Well, you got 2 lefty pinheads to post, but neither one wants to address the topic or your op.....time to pack it in
 
bravo said:
Well, you got 2 lefty pinheads to post, but neither one wants to address the topic or your op.....time to pack it in
Click to expand...

those two rarely, well onceler once in a blue moon will take dems on, but never zappa. if it paints the dems in a bad light and throws water on his "it is all the republicans fault" schtick, zappa avoids discussion of it like the plague. he will only come in and attack whoever made the thread or posts against his political beliefs.

10% of his post are discussion/debate, the other 90% are insults.
 
"Take on the Dems" - what an idiot. Do you ever "take on the Repubs"?

What's to "take on"? He says they don't have the votes, but probably will. Is this the 1st time you've looked into what happens to legislation on the Hill? They go back & forth until enough Congresspeople have what they want to get the votes.

Welcome to Washington, Yurtsie. There...did I "take on the Dems"?
 
Onceler said:
"Take on the Dems" - what an idiot. Do you ever "take on the Repubs"?

What's to "take on"? He says they don't have the votes, but probably will. Is this the 1st time you've looked into what happens to legislation on the Hill? They go back & forth until enough Congresspeople have what they want to get the votes.

Welcome to Washington, Yurtsie. There...did I "take on the Dems"?
Click to expand...

i take on the pubs quite often. thanks for asking.

how funny how you rant about pubs being obstructionist, but now, bend over backwards to defend the dems BLOCKING or delaying the jobs bill that is supposedly a near national emergency. you didn't answer the question, you gave a bland generic statement as to what usually happens with bills, obama said this bill must be passed now and the dems are holding it up.

why? if jobs are so important, why are the dems holding up jobs?

NOTE: assuming for argument sake this bill will actually work
 
Yurt said:
i take on the pubs quite often. thanks for asking.

how funny how you rant about pubs being obstructionist, but now, bend over backwards to defend the dems BLOCKING or delaying the jobs bill that is supposedly a near national emergency. you didn't answer the question, you gave a bland generic statement as to what usually happens with bills, obama said this bill must be passed now and the dems are holding it up.

why? if jobs are so important, why are the dems holding up jobs?

NOTE: assuming for argument sake this bill will actually work
Click to expand...

I don't generally rant about the repubs being obstructionist. Both parties can be obstructionist, but this is not a case of obstructionism. You must have just learned the term if you think that it is. This is a typical case of legislation being haggled over until enough people have what they want.

Obstructionism is seeking to defeat legislation for a larger agenda or political objective.

You're so naive when it comes to politics sometimes. The most basic things have to be explained to you.
 
Onceler said:
I don't generally rant about the repubs being obstructionist. Both parties can be obstructionist, but this is not a case of obstructionism. You must have just learned the term if you think that it is. This is a typical case of legislation being haggled over until enough people have what they want.

Obstructionism is seeking to defeat legislation for a larger agenda or political objective.

You're so naive when it comes to politics sometimes. The most basic things have to be explained to you.
Click to expand...

but this is not a case of obstructionism ??? really....

According to your party / the Presidents Party, Democrats don’t currently have the votes for Obama jobs bill.....and they have the majority vote in the Senate....WTF don't you understand here....?
Maybe this is a case where even the Presidents's party sees his idea is stupid and that won't help the nation
 
bravo said:
but this is not a case of obstructionism ??? really....

According to your party / the Presidents Party, Democrats don’t currently have the votes for Obama jobs bill.....and they have the majority vote in the Senate....WTF don't you understand here....?
Maybe this is a case where even the Presidents's party sees his idea is stupid and that won't help the nation
Click to expand...

So you don't understand obstructionism either?

You guys on the right aren't too sharp...
 
Just curious for an answer from you scholars - do you think that every time a piece of legislation can't muster enough votes for passage, it's an example of "obstructionism"?
 
Onceler said:
Just curious for an answer from you scholars - do you think that every time a piece of legislation can't muster enough votes for passage, it's an example of "obstructionism"?
Click to expand...

I don't , but it seems YOU DO....


According to your party / the Presidents Party, Democrats don’t currently have the votes for Obama jobs bill.....and they have the majority vote in the Senate.


Are these Democrats being obstructionists ?

=======================================================
"Obstructionism is seeking to defeat legislation for a larger agenda or political objective".?....I think not....

I'll go with the accepted definition.....

It is the deliberate interference with the progress of a legislation by various means such as filibustering or slow walking which may depend on the respective parliamentary procedures.
it is seeking to defeat (or not support) legislation because you most likely think its bad legislation
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top