Covid Jab Follies: The more you know.

A sobering article from the Defender came out yesterday:

Quoting the introduction:
**
People who received COVID-19 vaccines had a significantly higher risk of death in the first year after vaccination compared to the unvaccinated, and the risk increased with each additional dose, according to an analysis of a Japanese database of 18 million people.

Medical commentator John Campbell, Ph.D., examined the data on his YouTube show this week. The data were originally released in June as part of a roundtable discussion, which was streamed online and led by Yasufumi Murakami, Ph.D., vice director of the Research Center for RNA Science at the Tokyo University of Science.

“The more doses you get, the sooner you are likely to die, within a shorter period,” Murakami said during the roundtable.

In his analysis, Campbell said deaths in the vaccinated group were up to four-and-a-half times higher than in the unvaccinated group. The data also showed that deaths among the vaccinated peaked between 90-120 days after vaccination, with the peak occurring sooner as the number of doses increased.

“If someone had had three doses, the peak might be after about … 120 days,” Campbell said. “But if they had four or five doses, the peak in deaths would be earlier, maybe about 90 days.”

The risk of death in vaccinated people remained elevated for the first year following vaccination, “significantly so for the first 240 days,” whereas for unvaccinated people, “no peak forms, which is the expected” outcome, Campbell said.

**
 

Again, wouldn't go that far- I think the main issue is that people don't seem to realize that the quality of the studies, experts, scientists and research makes a huge difference. And while there are some brave anonymous sources, a lot of time they are anonymous because if we knew who they actually -were-, we'd strongly suspect what they have to say.
 
Again, wouldn't go that far- I think the main issue is that people don't seem to realize that the quality of the studies, experts, scientists and research makes a huge difference. And while there are some brave anonymous sources, a lot of time they are anonymous because if we knew who they actually -were-, we'd strongly suspect what they have to say.
And let's not forget how people who were formerly revered in their field suddenly become personna-non-grata when they dare to voice contrary facts.
 
Back
Top