Comey VS Comey..

Getin the ring

Verified User
the man has lost all credibility, where does a disgraced former FBI director go for work? CNN?

Fired FBI Director James Comey’s testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee accomplished one thing: With his testimony, Comey’s case against President Trump collapsed like a house of cards.





Not only did Comey’s testimony clear President Trump – admitting under oath that the President was not under any investigation – his testimony unmasked Comey’s real motivation in all of this.

It was a stunning revelation. Comey – the nation’s top intelligence official – admitted under oath that he leaked privileged documents to a friend to give to reporters at the New York Times. Memos that he had written in the course of his official government duties about privileged conversations with the President. The reason: Comey testified that he did so to manipulate the situation and force the appointment of a Special Counsel. (And, as we know – that’s ultimately what occurred.)

That’s right – the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigations admits to being the leaker-in-chief – taking it upon himself to do what others are being prosecuted for – leaking information in order to damage the President and the Trump Administration.

This is the most compelling evidence yet that Comey was anything but independent in his position at the FBI. In an editorial, the Wall Street Journal correctly notes the partisan nature of Comey’s actions:

“He’s a government official motivated by political self-interest who should have resigned if he believed what he now says he did. That he failed to act at the time suggests his motive now is more revenge than truth-telling.”



There’s no question about it. Comey craves the spotlight. Comey likes to be the center of attention. And his decision to appear yesterday before the Senate committee was an opportunity to even the score against a President who correctly fired him last month. It was revenge – pure and simple.

And his latest testimony again makes clear what I've said all along. Comey sufferers from selective disclosure disease. When it benefits him – and puts him in the spotlight – he'll talk about it. When it doesn't, he selectively ignores it.

Comey’s admission that he is a leaker also raises serious legal questions. In my view, Comey broke the law: 18 U.S.C. § 641 provides that it is a federal crime to, without authority, convey a record of the United States, in this case an FBI record he admits under oath he leaked after being fired.

Those who know the truth – those who understand that President Trump did nothing wrong in having open and frank discussions with Comey – see Comey’s testimony for what it really is – another attempt to put himself in the spotlight – to make himself the center of attention – a last ditch pathetic attempt to rehabilitate his reputation that he alone is responsible for shattering.

The hearing represents an important victory for the President. Not only was Comey completely discredited before the Senate Committee, the statement by the President’s attorney was sound and spot on.

Now is the time for the President to move forward with his agenda.



Jay Sekulow is Chief Counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice
 
That's a somewhat partisan rendering.

Comey didn't leak to "damage Trump." He leaked to try to get an independent counsel assigned.

Why? Comey testified under oath that Trump wasn't subject to investigation.

The implications are that there isn't even *probable cause* to suspect Trump had anything to do with the Russians who may or may not have [depending how much stock you put in Crowdstrike's conclusions] have meddled in the election.

As it is, it is a counter-intelligence investigation that looks to discover if any citizens were wittingly or unwittingly used by Russian agents in the election.

Didn't you say Congress was an investigative body? Don't we still have the FBI? What's the point of an SP unless it's to add some political gravity to what any objective observer would call a witch hunt?
 
Why? Comey testified under oath that Trump wasn't subject to investigation.

The implications are that there isn't even *probable cause* to suspect Trump had anything to do with the Russians who may or may not have [depending how much stock you put in Crowdstrike's conclusions] have meddled in the election.

As it is, it is a counter-intelligence investigation that looks to discover if any citizens were wittingly or unwittingly used by Russian agents in the election.

Didn't you say Congress was an investigative body? Don't we still have the FBI? What's the point of an SP unless it's to add some political gravity to what any objective observer would call a witch hunt?

You & other Trump supporters are the only ones who think Trump is completely separate from his campaign.
 
You & other Trump supporters are the only ones who think Trump is completely separate from his campaign.

we are waiting for any collusion conspiracy evidence, on anybody campaign or otherwise, hows that?
even a theory would bolster your cause to something beyond whining like children

but for now, is what it is I guess
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Center_for_Law_&_Justice



The American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) is a politically conservative, Christian-based social activism organization in the United States.[citation needed] It is headquartered in Washington, D.C. and associated with Regent University School of Law in Virginia Beach, Virginia. The ACLJ was founded in 1990 by law school graduate and evangelical minister Pat Robertson to protect constitutional and human rights worldwide. ACLJ generally pursues constitutional issues and conservative Christian ideals in courts of law.[1][2][3][4] The leaders of the ACLJ also occasionally engage in public debates to present their perspective on legal and Constitutional issues.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jay_Sekulow



Jay Alan Sekulow (born June 10, 1956) is an American attorney and Chief Counsel for the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ). He also hosts a talk show, which airs on radio and television. Sekulow is a frequent guest commentator on the Christian Broadcasting Network and the Fox News Channel.
 
the man has lost all credibility, where does a disgraced former FBI director go for work? CNN?

Fired FBI Director James Comey’s testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee accomplished one thing: With his testimony, Comey’s case against President Trump collapsed like a house of cards.





Not only did Comey’s testimony clear President Trump – admitting under oath that the President was not under any investigation – his testimony unmasked Comey’s real motivation in all of this.

It was a stunning revelation. Comey – the nation’s top intelligence official – admitted under oath that he leaked privileged documents to a friend to give to reporters at the New York Times. Memos that he had written in the course of his official government duties about privileged conversations with the President. The reason: Comey testified that he did so to manipulate the situation and force the appointment of a Special Counsel. (And, as we know – that’s ultimately what occurred.)

That’s right – the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigations admits to being the leaker-in-chief – taking it upon himself to do what others are being prosecuted for – leaking information in order to damage the President and the Trump Administration.

This is the most compelling evidence yet that Comey was anything but independent in his position at the FBI. In an editorial, the Wall Street Journal correctly notes the partisan nature of Comey’s actions:

“He’s a government official motivated by political self-interest who should have resigned if he believed what he now says he did. That he failed to act at the time suggests his motive now is more revenge than truth-telling.”



There’s no question about it. Comey craves the spotlight. Comey likes to be the center of attention. And his decision to appear yesterday before the Senate committee was an opportunity to even the score against a President who correctly fired him last month. It was revenge – pure and simple.

And his latest testimony again makes clear what I've said all along. Comey sufferers from selective disclosure disease. When it benefits him – and puts him in the spotlight – he'll talk about it. When it doesn't, he selectively ignores it.

Comey’s admission that he is a leaker also raises serious legal questions. In my view, Comey broke the law: 18 U.S.C. § 641 provides that it is a federal crime to, without authority, convey a record of the United States, in this case an FBI record he admits under oath he leaked after being fired.

Those who know the truth – those who understand that President Trump did nothing wrong in having open and frank discussions with Comey – see Comey’s testimony for what it really is – another attempt to put himself in the spotlight – to make himself the center of attention – a last ditch pathetic attempt to rehabilitate his reputation that he alone is responsible for shattering.

The hearing represents an important victory for the President. Not only was Comey completely discredited before the Senate Committee, the statement by the President’s attorney was sound and spot on.

Now is the time for the President to move forward with his agenda.



Jay Sekulow is Chief Counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice

^Folks, this is referred to as desperation.
 
Why? Comey testified under oath that Trump wasn't subject to investigation.

The implications are that there isn't even *probable cause* to suspect Trump had anything to do with the Russians who may or may not have [depending how much stock you put in Crowdstrike's conclusions] have meddled in the election.

As it is, it is a counter-intelligence investigation that looks to discover if any citizens were wittingly or unwittingly used by Russian agents in the election.

Didn't you say Congress was an investigative body? Don't we still have the FBI? What's the point of an SP unless it's to add some political gravity to what any objective observer would call a witch hunt?

Who appointed the SP?
 
we are waiting for any collusion conspiracy evidence, on anybody campaign or otherwise, hows that?
even a theory would bolster your cause to something beyond whining like children

but for now, is what it is I guess

But they're still investigating lol!

What I don't get is why some of them are so hopeful about the outcome---when there's little if any basis for hope. You have to believe that amongst all the leaks and leakers the Smoking Gun hasn't been leaked yet. Pardon my skepticism on that. They've been looking at Flynn for months and as far as I know they might have him for violating the obscure Logan Act.

At best, Flynn went rogue so that doesn't get Trump. That's all they got.
 
and eric

and sessions


its taking time because it will take down half of your party with it


remember you guys brought Russians to your fucking GOP convention so they could meet and greet the entire party
 
and eric

and sessions


its taking time because it will take down half of your party with it


remember you guys brought Russians to your fucking GOP convention so they could meet and greet the entire party

you know, if I was this shallow in thought ^^^^ I would just stay out of big boy conversation, seriously.
 
the man has lost all credibility, where does a disgraced former FBI director go for work? CNN?

Fired FBI Director James Comey’s testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee accomplished one thing: With his testimony, Comey’s case against President Trump collapsed like a house of cards.

In your dreams slackjaw...
Comey is well respected and a friend of the only guy that matters right now...
MUELLER.
 
So now Mueller is your hero of the day,

Obama, Lynch, Hillary, Comey, and now Mueller
gosh darn it, someone has to take this orangetweet down huh?

bunch of goofs
 
Back
Top