CLINTONS "PAY FOR PLAY" with the Russians

Further, former Secretary of State Clinton’s initial opposition coincided with a $500,000 speech her husband gave in Moscow – a link her 2016 campaign fought to downplay in the press, according to WikiLeaks-released documents.
++

that is some high priced collusion


the former president indeed had received a personal call from then-Prime Minister Vladimir Putin expressing his appreciation for the speech. According to Mrs. Clinton’s ethics disclosure form filed while she was secretary of State, Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 by the Russia-based finance company Renaissance Capital for his June 29, 2010, speech in Moscow to its employees and guests attending the company's annual conference.

The speech is now coming back to haunt the Clintons, considering the company that cut the check was allegedly tied to the scandal that spurred the Global Magnitsky Act, a bill that imposed sanctions on Russians designated as human-rights abusers and eventually would become law in 2012.

This was the same law Russian attorney Natalia Veselnitskaya was lobbying against during her sit-down with Trump Jr. last year. And back in 2010, it would h
Click to expand...
the fake news press will not even mention this
 
Jarod said:
I hope they investigate, but UPDATE, HRC is not president!
Click to expand...
heres another UPDATE goofy,

Russian collusion seems to be all your side has now, so chew on this noodle for a few months

Imagine if Melania got $500,000 for a Russian speaking engagement.
Liberal media would be 24/7 coverage pissing all over themselves
but yet ((crickets))
does that not in the least concern you at the sincerity of this witch hunt?
 
Jarod said:
I hope they investigate, but UPDATE, HRC is not president!
Click to expand...

It was too close for comfort, though. Her conduct needs to be thoroughly investigated and any criminal behavior prosecuted to avoid any possibility of her return to office.
 
Hillary Clinton sided with Russia on sanctions as Bill made $500K on Moscow speech


x38je4sykdaz.jpg
 
There is an age old wisdom that educates someone before they embark on criticism.
If you think Trump is at some kind of fault for collusion with Russia, first ask yourself for what gain, if the only answer you can come up with is money then wisdom would tell you to drop it.
What on this earth could Trump do with any more money than he has. if your answer is power, what gain of power would colluding with Putin bring him. At some point you become tin foil hat material.
Which is where most liberals find themselves now, and being too stupid and stubborn to back down now. they are all in on this one, and I couldn't be more entertained by it.

On the other hand, Bill and Hillary getting 500k for Bill speaking to a group of Russian businessman as if there was actually some sort of wisdom he could share being worth that kind of money, at the same time Hillary was campaigning to turn over our plutonium to Putin. noooooo, nothing to see here, move along.

Liberals are so lost it's pathetically humorous.
 
Fact: the Clintons actively colluded with Russians in 1996 when they meddled in the Russian election.

The fake news media was so proud of their collusion they pot in on the front page.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top