Clinton campaign seeks to block Durham access to Perkins Coie documents

[Grokmaster]

WOW!! Color me surprised!! The treasonous criminals are running for cover now!!



Clinton campaign seeks to block Durham access to Perkins Coie documents


The committee for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign is seeking to block Special Counsel John Durham from obtaining certain documents related to law firm Perkins Coie and its work with the campaign, the Democratic National Committee and opposition research firm Fusion GPS.


In a filing late Thursday, Hillary for America (HFA), the principal campaign committee for former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, argued that certain privileged documents should be withheld based on attorney-client privilege.

Durham’s team, earlier this month, had sought the production of documents related to the work and requested the non-party entities provide "further justification for the assertion of their privilege."

Hillary For America and the DNC are the holders of the privileges at issue, according to the filing.

Perkins Coie is the law firm that the DNC and the Clinton campaign used to fund the now-infamous anti-Trump dossier. The unverified dossier was authored by Christopher Steele, an ex-British intelligence officer, and commissioned by Fusion GPS.

To support the opposition to compel and justify the assertion of attorney-client privilege, Hillary For American provided declarations from Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook and Clinton campaign chair John Podesta.

~ "One of the topics about which Perkins Coie provided legal services and legal advice to HFA involved fact-finding and research that the campaign conducted regarding candidate Donald Trump," Mook states.

"Although I was not aware during the campaign of any contractors that Perkins Coie engaged to assist it in providing legal services and legal advice regarding this work, I did believe throughout the campaign that whatever work Perkins Coie performed, either through its own professionals or through any contractors it may have engaged to assist it, the work was done for the purpose of providing legal services and legal advice to HFA," Mook states.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...sedgntp&cvid=6858297198074058a50d8bd0dd774740




SEE HOW THEY LIE. DURHAM WILL NOT LET UP.

 

[Grokmaster]

 

[dukkha]

Although I was not aware during the campaign of any contractors that Perkins Coie engaged to assist it in providing legal services and legal advice regarding this work, I did believe throughout the campaign that whatever work Perkins Coie performed, either through its own professionals or through any contractors it may have engaged to assist it, the work was done for the purpose of providing legal services and legal advice to HFA,"

Mook states. Mooks was campaign manager for Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign

It's a reunion of the old Weasel Network!

 

[Grokmaster]

Mook states. Mooks was campaign manager for Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign

It's a reunion of the old Weasel Network!

But he was "unaware" of any of the shit FusionGPS and the corrupt, treasonous Obama DOJ/CIA were pulling....

 

[Legion]

DEMOCRAT dirty tricks.

 

[Truth Detector]

WOW!! Color me surprised!! The treasonous criminals are running for cover now!!



Clinton campaign seeks to block Durham access to Perkins Coie documents


The committee for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign is seeking to block Special Counsel John Durham from obtaining certain documents related to law firm Perkins Coie and its work with the campaign, the Democratic National Committee and opposition research firm Fusion GPS.


In a filing late Thursday, Hillary for America (HFA), the principal campaign committee for former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, argued that certain privileged documents should be withheld based on attorney-client privilege.

Durham’s team, earlier this month, had sought the production of documents related to the work and requested the non-party entities provide "further justification for the assertion of their privilege."

Hillary For America and the DNC are the holders of the privileges at issue, according to the filing.

Perkins Coie is the law firm that the DNC and the Clinton campaign used to fund the now-infamous anti-Trump dossier. The unverified dossier was authored by Christopher Steele, an ex-British intelligence officer, and commissioned by Fusion GPS.

To support the opposition to compel and justify the assertion of attorney-client privilege, Hillary For American provided declarations from Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook and Clinton campaign chair John Podesta.

~ "One of the topics about which Perkins Coie provided legal services and legal advice to HFA involved fact-finding and research that the campaign conducted regarding candidate Donald Trump," Mook states.

"Although I was not aware during the campaign of any contractors that Perkins Coie engaged to assist it in providing legal services and legal advice regarding this work, I did believe throughout the campaign that whatever work Perkins Coie performed, either through its own professionals or through any contractors it may have engaged to assist it, the work was done for the purpose of providing legal services and legal advice to HFA," Mook states.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...sedgntp&cvid=6858297198074058a50d8bd0dd774740

SEE HOW THEY LIE. DURHAM WILL NOT LET UP.

The Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses are knee deep in corruption and illegality. Their media allies are continuing to attempt the greatest cover up in journalistic history, as they are complicit in it as well.

 

[Grokmaster]

Perkins-Coies is who PAID ALL THE SEDITIONISTS....there is so much corruption/treason in their records...

 

[Concart]

So when someone tries to block access to documents, that means they are guilty of something. Do I have that right?

 

[Grokmaster]

So when someone tries to block access to documents, that means they are guilty of something. Do I have that right?

There is no question that illegal spying, etc. took place via the Hillary Campaign, DNC and Obama DOJ/CIA from 2015- on.

Now Mook pretends he was "unaware" of those activities, an obvious lie.

Perkins-Coies will be compelled to provide the data.


FAR DIFFERENT THAN DEMANDING DOCS TO "FISH" FOR AN UJKNOWN CRIME, DUMBFUCK.

 

[archives]

Let’s see, Durham has been at it nearly three years now, twice as long as the Mueller investigation, all he has done is find one obscure individual guilty of lying and is now attempting to take another minor character to trial over who knows what, and you expect everyone in the pond Durham is fishing in to accommodate his requests?

And if this an indication of guilt as you and Jessie are implying how can all the refusals, 5th Amendment pleas, and needed subpoenas on the January 6th coup team not be proof of guilt?

Got to believe the only reason the DOJ doesn’t cut or eliminate Durham’s funding is because they know he is twiddling his thumbs, he can’t even get the right wing media good innuendos to float

 

[dukkha]

There is no question that illegal spying, etc. took place via the Hillary Campaign, DNC and Obama DOJ/CIA from 2015- on.

Now Mook pretends he was "unaware" of those activities, an obvious lie.

Perkins-Coies will be compelled to provide the data.


FAR DIFFERENT THAN DEMANDING DOCS TO "FISH" FOR AN UJKNOWN CRIME, DUMBFUCK.

looks to me like Durham is putting the pieces together for a RICO
indict the small fish, establish the conspiracy,and then go after the bigger fish with small fish testimony

 

[archives]

looks to me like Durham is putting the pieces together for a RICO
indict the small fish, establish the conspiracy,and then go after the bigger fish with small fish testimony

Right, at the rate and success he has shown, even if he could, it would be decades down the road

 

[dukkha]

Right, at the rate and success he has shown, even if he could, it would be decades down the road

it's coming together. Remember he lost over a year of being able to interview due to COVID
Sussman goes to trail in May -that should give some more indications

 

[archives]

it's coming together. Remember he lost over a year of being able to interview due to COVID
Sussman goes to trail in May -that should give some more indications

Indication of what? What law are we talking about here? Is the Washington Examiner going to be investigated since they were the ones to hire and pay for the dirt on Trump?

 

[Celticguy]

But he was "unaware" of any of the shit FusionGPS and the corrupt, treasonous Obama DOJ/CIA were pulling....

which we alrady know is false...

 

[dukkha]

Indication of what? What law are we talking about here? Is the Washington Examiner going to be investigated since they were the ones to hire and pay for the dirt on Trump?

C'mon. the examiner stopped using Fusion (or was it Perkins Coie?) before Clinton hired them
Im not going to argue over this. we are only getting glimpses of Durhams work

It will come out in the wash-all the Clinton dirty deeds.

 

[archives]

C'mon. the examiner stopped using Fusion (or was it Perkins Coie?) before Clinton hired them
Im not going to argue over this. we are only getting glimpses of Durhams work

It will come out in the wash-all the Clinton dirty deeds.

But the Examiner did the exact same thing the Clinton campaign did, hired Fusion to dig up dirt on Trump, how is one guilty of something and not the other? And, again, what is the law involved? What illegality was committed?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

But he was "unaware" of any of the shit FusionGPS and the corrupt, treasonous Obama DOJ/CIA were pulling....

would be discovered...

 

[dukkha]

But the Examiner did the exact same thing the Clinton campaign did, hired Fusion to dig up dirt on Trump, how is one guilty of something and not the other? And, again, what is the law involved? What illegality was committed?

The examiner was doing opposition esearch ( been a long time going by memory)
Clinton did much more -including feeding info to the FBI, thru Sussman but also Bruce and Nellie Ohr
She knew it was fake. She paid for the Steele dossier..I mean there is a world of difference
and im not about to recite the entire fraud

 

[archives]

The examiner was doing opposition esearch ( been a long time going by memory)
Clinton did much more -including feeding info to the FBI, thru Sussman but also Bruce and Nellie Ohr
She knew it was fake. She paid for the Steele dossier..I mean there is a world of difference
and im not about to recite the entire fraud

Examiner was looking for dirt on Trump, for Marco Rubio to be exact, as was the Clinton campaign, exact same thing, and the “feeding info” element/fraud is all innuendo, which is exactly why after three years Durham hasn’t come up with anything beyond finding some low level individual of lying