City workers banned from official travel to Arizona

[TuTu Monroe]

You tell me?

Maybe you, ID and disloyal should sit down and decide which one of the three of you it is?

Oh my, so you really are a crazy jackass. Tsk! Tsk!

 

[imnoliber]

topspin is a big stupid fucker no doubt, but around here nobody likes nit picking.

It may be nit picking to you, but my point is that it is not very productive to give much credence to someone who doesn't know the difference between "their" and "there" and between "then" and "than". Be that nit picking, so be it.

 

[Damocles]

I really don't know what you're talking about. The way I read her post, she was defending the boycott of Arizona on the grounds that the Arizona law is (arguably) a violation of civil rights whereas the dumbass boycott of the Dixie Chicks was because they hurt George Bush's fee-fees.

And for some reason you seem to think that the City of San Francisco is somehow doing something wrong. I'd love to hear that argument rather than your asinine oblique references to "official force" and "force of the government as an employer."

Again, the comparison itself is ridiculous. A City making policy is not the same thing as people choosing to do something. They are not equivalent as she suggested they are.

1st post I read from her is, "And the Dixie Chicks fans... blah, blah!" with nothing about how it was okay for the reason you supplied for her.

My sole point is that government policy is not the same thing as people making choices.