Christian To Be Executed For Refusing to Return To Islam

Alias

Banned
An Iranian pastor who has refused to recant his Christian faith faces execution as early as Wednesday after his sentence was upheld by an Iranian court.

Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani, who maintains he has never been a Muslim as an adult, has Islamic ancestry and therefore must recant his faith in Jesus Christ, the 11th branch of Iran's Gilan Provincial Court ruled. Iran's Supreme Court had ordered the trial court to determine whether Nadarkhani had been a Muslim prior to converting to Christianity.

An undated photograph provided by the American Center for Law & Justice shows Youcef Nadarkhani, an Iranian pastor who faces execution for refusing to recant his Christian faith.

The judges, according to the American Center for Law & Justice, demanded that Nadarkhani, 34, recant his Christian faith before submission of evidence. Though the judgment runs against current Iranian and international laws and is not codified in Iranian penal code, the judge stated that the court must uphold the decision of the 27th Branch of the Supreme Court in Qom.

When asked to repent, Nadarkhani stated: "Repent means to return. What should I return to? To the blasphemy that I had before my faith in Christ?"

"To the religion of your ancestors, Islam," the judge replied, according to the American Center for Law & Justice.

"I cannot," Nadarkhani said.

Nadarkhani is the latest Christian cleric to be imprisoned in Iran for his religious beliefs. According to Elam Ministries, a United Kingdom-based organization that serves Christian churches in Iran, there was a significant increase in the number of Christians arrested solely for practicing their faith between June 2010 and January. A total of 202 arrests occurred during that six-month period, including 33 people who remained in prison as of January, Elam reported.

An Assyrian evangelical pastor, Rev. Wilson Issavi, was imprisoned for 54 days for allegedly converting Muslims prior to his release in March 2010, Elam officials told FoxNews.com.

Nadarkhani, a pastor in the 400-member Church of Iran, has been held in that country’s Gilan Province since October 2009, after he protested to local education authorities that his child was forced to read from the Koran at school. His wife, Fatemeh Pasandideh, was also arrested in June 2010 in an apparent attempt to pressure him to renounce his faith. She was released in October 2010, according to Amnesty International.

Nadarkhani was sentenced to death for apostasy last September based on religious writings by Iranian clerics, including Ayatollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran, despite the fact that there is no offense of "apostasy" in the nation's penal code, Amnesty International reports.

In June, the Supreme Court of Iran ruled that a lower court should re-examine procedural flaws in the case, giving local judges the power to decide whether to release, execute or retry Nadarkhani. The verdict, according to Amnesty International, includes a provision for the sentence to be overturned should Nadarkhani renounce his faith.

Elise Auerbach, an Iranian analyst for Amnesty International USA, told FoxNews.com that an execution for apostasy has not been carried out in Iran since 1990. Nadarkhani's sentence is a "clear violation of international law," she said.

"The key is to keep up the pressure and to publicize the story because it obviously outrages most people," Auerbach said. "It's part of the pattern of persecution based on religion in Iran."

Kiri Kankhwende, a spokeswoman for Christian Solidarity Worldwide, a human rights organization that specializes in religious freedom, told FoxNews.com that Nadarkhani was asked for the fourth time to renounce his faith during a hearing early Wednesday and he denied that request.

"We're waiting to hear the final outcome," she told FoxNews.com. We're still waiting to hear what they've decided."

Kankhwende said Nadarkhani could be executed Wednesday or Thursday.

"Iran is unpredictable," she said. "We can't say when it might happen. It's a very real threat, but we can't say when exactly."

Calls seeking comment from the U.S. State Department were not returned. Attempts to reach attorney, Mohammed Ali Dadkhah, were not successful.

House Speaker John Boehner said Nadarkhani's case is "distressing for people of every country and creed," according to a statement released on Wednesday.

"While Iran's government claims to promote tolerance, it continues to imprison many of its people because of their faith," the statement read. "This goes beyond the law to an issue of fundamental respect for human dignity. I urge Iran's leaders to abandon this dark path, spare [Nadarkhani's] life, and grant him a full and unconditional release."

Father Jonathan Morris, a Roman Catholic priest in the Archdiocese of New York and an analyst for Fox News Channel, said Nadarkhani's case is "unmistakable evidence" that Iran is executing Christians simply because they refuse to become Muslims.

Morris continued: "Will President Obama, and the free world, allow the United Nations to continue in its cowardly silence on this matter?"


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/0...sing-to-recant-christian-faith/#ixzz1ZGbovvw8
 
Hundreds and hundreds of examples of the barbarism within this sick fuckin religion and

yet the pinheads continue to tell us...

Its The religion of Peace and Love......
 
Should America bomb Iran or something?


It's their country, and none of our business.


Although the death penalty is deplorable, the US practices it, too.
 
What's to say? It's deplorable. Add that to the literally countless examples of people perverting religion for their own agenda...

Yes, it's deplorable. This is not about "religion". This is about Islam executing a Christian for refusing to go back to Islam. That's the topic. Do you find a problem with that?
 
I wonder if you think bravo's comments are....

typical two faced onceler bullshit...from your silence and defense of SF, i take it that you agree with him about bigotry and that you defend the christians death sentence.

how sad, but not surprising. (NOTE: using your logic)
 
You want to defend Islam? Go for it. I'll be here all day. Tell us how Islam can be "The Religion of Peace" and then execute someone for becoming a Christian.

The same way Christianity can be a religion of peace, despite the overwhelming violence in its history.
 
typical two faced onceler bullshit...from your silence and defense of SF, i take it that you agree with him about bigotry and that you defend the christians death sentence.

how sad, but not surprising. (NOTE: using your logic)

That you're a bigot when it comes to religion? Yeah, I agree w/ him.
 
You want to defend Islam? Go for it. I'll be here all day. Tell us how Islam can be "The Religion of Peace" and then execute someone for becoming a Christian.

I'll let George tell you:

 
That you're a bigot when it comes to religion? Yeah, I agree w/ him.

why don't you put up or shut up on that thread and prove your statements. you don't even realize that you're saying you and SF are bigots for being intolerant of my beliefs.

lmao. you are two a really dumb.
 
why don't you put up or shut up on that thread and prove your statements. you don't even realize that you're saying you and SF are bigots for being intolerant of my beliefs.

lmao. you are two a really dumb.

For being intolerant of your intolerance?

That's a new one...
 
The same way Christianity can be a religion of peace, despite the overwhelming violence in its history.

We are not talking about history here. The topic is A muslim court executing a Christian for refusing to return to Islam. Can you comment on the OP? Thanks.
 
We are not talking about history here. The topic is A muslim court executing a Christian for refusing to return to Islam. Can you comment on the OP? Thanks.

I said it was deplorable. Not sure what you're getting at here...am I supposed to conclude that this action represents an entire religion?
 
I said it was deplorable. Not sure what you're getting at here...am I supposed to conclude that this action represents an entire religion?

You can conclude whatever you want. These actions do represent Islam. Have you read the Quran?
 
The Proof from the Qur'an for the Commandment to Execute the Apostate

Here I wish briefly to offer proof that will quiet the doubt in the hearts of those who, for lack of sources of information, may think that perhaps the punishment of death did not exist in Islam but was added at a later time by the "mawlawis" (religious leaders) on their own.

God Most High declares in the Qur'an:

But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then are they your brethren in religion. We detail our revelations for a people who have knowledge. And if they break their pledges after their treaty (hath been made with you) and assail your religion, then fight the heads of disbelief -- Lo! they have no binding oaths in order that they may desist. (9:11,12)[1]

The following is the occasion for the revelation of this verse: During the pilgrimage (hajj) in A.H. 9 God Most High ordered a proclamation of an immunity. By virtue of this proclamation all those who, up to that time, were fighting against God and His Apostle and were attempting to obstruct the way of God's religion through all kinds of excesses and false covenants, were granted from that time a maximum respite of four months. During this period they were to ponder their own situation. If they wanted to accept Islam, they could accept it and they would be forgiven. If they wanted to leave the country, they could leave. Within this fixed period nothing would hinder them from leaving. Thereafter those remaining, who would neither accept Islam nor leave the country, would be dealt with by the sword. In this connection it was said: "If they repent and uphold the practice of prayer and almsgiving, then they are your brothers in religion. If after this, however, they break their covenant, then war should be waged against the leaders of kufr (infidelity). Here "covenant breaking" in no way can be construed to mean "breaking of political covenants". Rather, the context clearly determines its meaning to be "confessing Islam and then renouncing it". Thereafter the meaning of "fight the heads of disbelief" (9:11,12) can only mean that war should be waged against the leaders instigating apostasy.[2][7]

END OF QUOTE

http://answering-islam.org/Silas/apostasy.htm
 
Back
Top