"China's new world order"

archives

Verified User
"The largest free trade area in the world came into existence over the weekend — and the U.S. was not even invited. For the first time in living memory, the hegemon at the center of a major global free trade agreement is not the U.S. China has stepped into Uncle Sam's shoes, and now anchors the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, or RCEP, an area covering 2.2 billion people and 1/3 of all the economic activity on the planet."

"The Obama administration was explicit that the U.S. should be the anchor of a Pacific Rim trade agreement, the TPP, that pointedly excluded China."

"China is negotiating a trade deal that would carve up some of the fastest-growing markets in the world at our expense," wrote then-President Obama in 2016."

"Big new trade pacts are extremely difficult to negotiate. China showed real determination in getting this one done, even as the U.S. demonstrated almost no interest in improving or even maintaining economic relations with the region."

https://www.axios.com/rcep-trade-bl...der-4993564c-ca57-411f-aca4-15250869f762.html

And while China was progressing, Trump has had the US locked in trade wars which has cost the US 300,000 jobs and .3% of the GDP (https://www.moodysanalytics.com/-/media/article/2019/trade-war-chicken.pdf) while producing next to nothing

Seems the "big deal maker" got played again
 
"The largest free trade area in the world came into existence over the weekend — and the U.S. was not even invited. For the first time in living memory, the hegemon at the center of a major global free trade agreement is not the U.S. China has stepped into Uncle Sam's shoes, and now anchors the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, or RCEP, an area covering 2.2 billion people and 1/3 of all the economic activity on the planet."

"The Obama administration was explicit that the U.S. should be the anchor of a Pacific Rim trade agreement, the TPP, that pointedly excluded China."

"China is negotiating a trade deal that would carve up some of the fastest-growing markets in the world at our expense," wrote then-President Obama in 2016."

"Big new trade pacts are extremely difficult to negotiate. China showed real determination in getting this one done, even as the U.S. demonstrated almost no interest in improving or even maintaining economic relations with the region."

https://www.axios.com/rcep-trade-bl...der-4993564c-ca57-411f-aca4-15250869f762.html

And while China was progressing, Trump has had the US locked in trade wars which has cost the US 300,000 jobs and .3% of the GDP (https://www.moodysanalytics.com/-/media/article/2019/trade-war-chicken.pdf) while producing next to nothing

Seems the "big deal maker" got played again
This is exactly what we knew was going to happen. We have lost so much ground with Trump.
 
"The largest free trade area in the world came into existence over the weekend — and the U.S. was not even invited. For the first time in living memory, the hegemon at the center of a major global free trade agreement is not the U.S. China has stepped into Uncle Sam's shoes, and now anchors the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, or RCEP, an area covering 2.2 billion people and 1/3 of all the economic activity on the planet."

"The Obama administration was explicit that the U.S. should be the anchor of a Pacific Rim trade agreement, the TPP, that pointedly excluded China."

"China is negotiating a trade deal that would carve up some of the fastest-growing markets in the world at our expense," wrote then-President Obama in 2016."

"Big new trade pacts are extremely difficult to negotiate. China showed real determination in getting this one done, even as the U.S. demonstrated almost no interest in improving or even maintaining economic relations with the region."

https://www.axios.com/rcep-trade-bl...der-4993564c-ca57-411f-aca4-15250869f762.html

And while China was progressing, Trump has had the US locked in trade wars which has cost the US 300,000 jobs and .3% of the GDP (https://www.moodysanalytics.com/-/media/article/2019/trade-war-chicken.pdf) while producing next to nothing

Seems the "big deal maker" got played again

Why were Hillary, Bernie and so many progressives against the TPP?
 
Why were Hillary, Bernie and so many progressives against the TPP?

Largely cause they were afraid of losing the Union endorsement in the primaries, Clinton actually worked to secure it when she was serving as Secretary of State

And look, your USC is 2-0, both late minute wins, but wins, and with no Oregon on the schedule looks good to move on, now what is the rumor Franklin is being recruited to move from Penn State to USC? That's going to take a lot of alumni going to the bank to buy out Clay
 
That is what you get from posting shit you know nothing about. Feel free to look it up.

Here we go again with the why don't you "look it up," like the other day's "proof" that "popeye" offered on dead people voting, go look it up if you don't believe it, beautiful
 
"The largest free trade area in the world came into existence over the weekend — and the U.S. was not even invited. For the first time in living memory, the hegemon at the center of a major global free trade agreement is not the U.S. China has stepped into Uncle Sam's shoes, and now anchors the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, or RCEP, an area covering 2.2 billion people and 1/3 of all the economic activity on the planet."

"The Obama administration was explicit that the U.S. should be the anchor of a Pacific Rim trade agreement, the TPP, that pointedly excluded China."

"China is negotiating a trade deal that would carve up some of the fastest-growing markets in the world at our expense," wrote then-President Obama in 2016."

"Big new trade pacts are extremely difficult to negotiate. China showed real determination in getting this one done, even as the U.S. demonstrated almost no interest in improving or even maintaining economic relations with the region."

https://www.axios.com/rcep-trade-bl...der-4993564c-ca57-411f-aca4-15250869f762.html

And while China was progressing, Trump has had the US locked in trade wars which has cost the US 300,000 jobs and .3% of the GDP (https://www.moodysanalytics.com/-/media/article/2019/trade-war-chicken.pdf) while producing next to nothing

Seems the "big deal maker" got played again



--->"... an area covering 2.2 billion people and 1/3 of all the economic activity on the planet." Gee, Communist China beating the USA at Global Capitalism. Who would have thought?
 
Here we go again with the why don't you "look it up," like the other day's "proof" that "popeye" offered on dead people voting, go look it up if you don't believe it, beautiful

Look Archives. If you are going to post something you should do more than just grab the first thing you see to make Trump look bad. It always backfires on you. Seriously, look it up. Educate yourself on this matter. Use more than one source. That way you might not look like the typical dumbfuck Democrat that you are. But, because I kind of feel bad for your ignorance here is a place to start. Six Asian nations and 3 other nations have to ratify it before it takes effect.
 
Look Archives. If you are going to post something you should do more than just grab the first thing you see to make Trump look bad. It always backfires on you. Seriously, look it up. Educate yourself on this matter. Use more than one source. That way you might not look like the typical dumbfuck Democrat that you are.

There it is again, "seriously, look it up. Educate yourself on this matter," you can't tell us what you think has to ratified and by whom yet you want us to "look it up," as I said before, beautiful

And by the way I did use two sources and if you want to see more, there are plenty
 
There it is again, "seriously, look it up. Educate yourself on this matter," you can't tell us what you think has to ratified and by whom yet you want us to "look it up," as I said before, beautiful

And by the way I did use two sources and if you want to see more, there are plenty

I know what it is about Archives. You obviously do not. No need to have a meltdown because you might actually have to learn something on your own.
 
I know what it is about Archives. You obviously do not. No need to have a meltdown because you might actually have to learn something on your own.

No you don't, your "look it up" proves it, if you did you could offer something in exchange other than "look it up"
 
No you don't, your "look it up" proves it, if you did you could offer something in exchange other than "look it up"

I even gave you a place to start. You are just another lazy fucking Democrat. To damn lazy to do anything for yourself but talk out your ass.
 
Back
Top