Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot issues ‘CALL TO ARMS’ over US Supreme Court

Not that most care, but she isn't far wrong, according to the wingers on the Court, if it ain't in the Constitution it ain't covered under the Constitution, meaning anything not specifically mentioned in the Bill of Rights regarding rights could be threatened
 
floridafan said:
You of all people sweetie pie, couldn't care less about black deaths.
Click to expand...

post links to your outcry about the black on black murder rate

white guy cop kills black felon while fighting...u all over it...something needs to be done

Blacks killing blacks EVERY wkend in Blue cities at all over America at 10 times+ the rate of any other race..not a peep from u about it
 
Last edited:
archives said:
Not that most care, but she isn't far wrong, according to the wingers on the Court, if it ain't in the Constitution it ain't covered under the Constitution, meaning anything not specifically mentioned in the Bill of Rights regarding rights could be threatened
Click to expand...

that's a gross mis-characterization of the issue. are you being intellectually dishonest about it?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
that's a gross mis-characterization of the issue. are you being intellectually dishonest about it?
Click to expand...

This is Arsecheese, would you expect anything else?

The Mississippi case, which Alito was responding to in his leaked draft opinion, doesn’t even ban abortions. It merely proposes to make most abortions illegal after 15 weeks, which means Mississippi abortion law would still be more liberal than, say, the law in France, Germany, Italy or Greece. As the bill for the law states, ‘fully 75 per cent of all nations do not permit abortion after 12 weeks’ gestation, except (in most instances) to save the life and preserve the physical health of the mother.’

The vehemence of the reaction to the Supreme Court leak, however, and the violent targeting of Christians as enemies of progress, suggests that America’s pro-abortion movement is not just for women’s rights, it’s against Christian ones. For progressives, democracies should move away from tolerance if it means that religious people can have power. That’s not liberalism. It’s revolutionary secularism. And it’s frightening.


https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/...n-christianity
 
zymurgy said:
it's Chicago - what's the worse that could happen?

View attachment 22435
Click to expand...

ffd0f85c58ddeed3c564c4764307eee6.jpg


Oh, sorry... That already has happened.
 
A call to arms.

A summons, invitation, or appeal to undertake a particular course of action a political call to arms.
 
Libs can't vote out a justice. There is nothing Political that they can do. So they resort to Dem Brown Shirt tactics and call for their assassination.
 
Mayor Beetlejuice err I mean Lightweight err Lightfoot is a clown. Only Democrats would elect an idiot like him err her err them. Ohell whatever the correct pronoun.
 
Primavera said:
This is Arsecheese, would you expect anything else?

The Mississippi case, which Alito was responding to in his leaked draft opinion, doesn’t even ban abortions. It merely proposes to make most abortions illegal after 15 weeks, which means Mississippi abortion law would still be more liberal than, say, the law in France, Germany, Italy or Greece. As the bill for the law states, ‘fully 75 per cent of all nations do not permit abortion after 12 weeks’ gestation, except (in most instances) to save the life and preserve the physical health of the mother.’

The vehemence of the reaction to the Supreme Court leak, however, and the violent targeting of Christians as enemies of progress, suggests that America’s pro-abortion movement is not just for women’s rights, it’s against Christian ones. For progressives, democracies should move away from tolerance if it means that religious people can have power. That’s not liberalism. It’s revolutionary secularism. And it’s frightening.


https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/...n-christianity
Click to expand...

.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top