Brief History of Minimum Wage Disasters

cawacko

Well-known member
I linked to the new NBER report referenced in the article below. I understand arguments over the minimum wage have become more about winning power and perception but the facts show who is getting hurt the most.




A Brief History of Minimum-Wage Disasters


New research finds that job losses are concentrated among older workers, women and blacks.


Democrats have been debating whether to tolerate congressional candidates who are pro-life, but when it comes to economic issues party leaders seem to have decided they’re all Sandernistas now. For example, there is absolute unanimity among senior elected Democrats in Washington that government should dictate a higher minimum wage. But this is another issue that deserves debate. New research shows the damage that minimum-wage laws have done to U.S. workers—and not just those employed in restaurants.

The latest warning against politicians committing economic malpractice arrives in a working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research. “People Versus Machines: The Impact of Minimum Wages on Automatable Jobs,” by Grace Lordan and David Neumark, examines decades of data to see what happens when legislated wage increases give employers a financial incentive to replace humans with technology.

Even before the publication of this report, restaurant workers were already learning what happens when political pressure to pay higher wages hits an industry that has the ability to automate. After a union harassment campaign against McDonald’s over its entry-level wages, the company accelerated the deployment of digital technology that allows customers to tap their orders on a screen instead of talking to a cashier. In the face of city and state mandates to raise wages, the chain has continued to automate more functions in its restaurants, and investors have been cheering. McDonald’s shares have risen more than 30% this year.

Now Ms. Lordan and Mr. Neumark show that mandating higher wages kills jobs for low-skill workers across a range of industries. According to the authors, older workers in manufacturing are hit particularly hard, with women and African-American workers also suffering disproportionate harm:

Overall, we find that increasing the minimum wage decreases significantly the share of automatable employment held by low-skilled workers. Our estimates suggest that an increase of the minimum wage by $1 (based on 2015 dollars) decreases the share of low-skilled automatable jobs by 0.43 percentage point... In particular, there are large effects on the shares of automatable employment in manufacturing, where we estimate that a $1 increase in the minimum wage decreases the share of automatable employment among low-skilled workers by 0.99 percentage point... Within manufacturing, the share of older workers in automatable employment declines most sharply, and the share of workers in automatable employment also declines sharply for women and blacks.

Our analysis at the individual level draws many similar conclusions. We find that a significant number of individuals who were previously in automatable employment are unemployed in the period following a minimum wage increase.

The authors also warn that the universe of jobs that can be done by machines is expanding, and will likely soon include such occupations as taxi drivers and bricklayers. This means that minimum wage laws could do more damage in the future than they have in the past.

According to the Democrats’ new “Better Deal” economic agenda, “increasing the minimum wage will provide economic security for all working Americans.” But it’s hard for Americans to have economic security if they’re not working.


https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-brief-history-of-minimum-wage-disasters-1502823330


http://papers.nber.org/tmp/62829-w23667.pdf
 
personally i think its because we mandate the increase but dont set up the right conditions for it to go up.
 
It's all about a living wage? $7.25 an hour is not a living wage? How do you justify paying a CEO of a corporation making tens of million dollars a year, when their employee's are not making a living wage?
-federal_minimum_wage-minimum_wage_increase-productivity_growth-business_news-living_wages-ktun372_low.jpg
 
It's all about a living wage? $7.25 an hour is not a living wage? How do you justify paying a CEO of a corporation making tens of million dollars a year, when their employee's are not making a living wage?
-federal_minimum_wage-minimum_wage_increase-productivity_growth-business_news-living_wages-ktun372_low.jpg

"living wage"

again, nothing but a slogan. You see the facts, people lose jobs and it's the people you purport to want to help. Cartoons don't replace the data/facts.
 
If I am reading the article correctly, the main point is that demands for minimium wage accelerates automation and the loss of jobs. I don't see the relationship, it appears automation is going to occur in those fields eventually, so profit is the real variable, minimium wage only as it effects profit, which has always been a consideration
 
If I am reading the article correctly, the main point is that demands for minimium wage accelerates automation and the loss of jobs. I don't see the relationship, it appears automation is going to occur in those fields eventually, so profit is the real variable, minimium wage only as it effects profit, which has always been a consideration

as it said it's about financial incentive; you force the increase in wages and you incentivize faster use of automation
 
Back
Top