I am getting dizzy from all this back and forth
The long and short of it, Rana, is that I'm right. As usual.
I am getting dizzy from all this back and forth
Was there any doubt that the SC of Ill. would rule in favor of this Democrat?
Corruption is alive and well in Ill. as it has been for decades.....
No surprise here at all....
I don't know why you find it so difficult to believe Rahm made a mistake filing his taxes. Surely you're aware there are a number of Dems who had difficulty filing their income tax.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
worthless decision and totally wrong
rahm's case is nothing like Smith....the court's ignored his express intent on the tax filing and other evidence showing rahm did intend to not be a resident....and i bet 10 bucks nigel agrees with the court that the Smith issues are identical....yet nigel will claim the obama/mccain b/c cases are not, once again showing he is nothing but a party hack
and the appellate court did in fact discuss and say what reside means...it means to "live" etc....
The majority today now makes clear that residency for all
purposes is the equivalent of domicile. The majority, therefore, should
overrule those portions of Pope, Park, and Clark which hold to the
contrary.
Because of the breadth of today’s decision, we do not join the
majority’s holding that residency is the equivalent of domicile and that
-25-
intent, therefore determines residency, even in the absence of any
physical presence. Rather, we would answer the narrow question that
was actually raised by the objectors in this case: Does a person lose
his permanent abode if the adobe is rented during the relevant
residency period? To that question we answer “no.” For that reason
alone, we join in the judgment of the majority.
Suddenly, Yurt's a bettin' man.
Hilarious.
worthless decision and totally wrong
rahm's case is nothing like Smith....the court's ignored his express intent on the tax filing and other evidence showing rahm did intend to not be a resident....and i bet 10 bucks nigel agrees with the court that the Smith issues are identical....yet nigel will claim the obama/mccain b/c cases are not, once again showing he is nothing but a party hack
and the appellate court did in fact discuss and say what reside means...it means to "live" etc....
we shall see
it will not be the first time that the scotus has fouled up - which either way they rule, you can bet that a large group of people will be pissed![]()
The laws in Illinois are always bent for liberals, while conservatives are held to the letter of it.
BTW, the Supreme court overturned the appeals court's ruling.